Foreign Bodies in the Gastrointestinal Tract and Anorectal Emergencies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2011.01.009Get rights and content

Section snippets

Foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract

In the United States, 1500 people die each year due to ingested foreign bodies (FBs).1 Eighty percent of FB ingestions occur in young children who swallow small objects such as coins, toys, crayons, and ballpoint pen caps.2, 3 Accidental FBs in adults tend to be caused by meat and bones. The remaining cases are found primarily among edentulous adults, prisoners, and psychiatric patients, who often intentionally ingest objects such as toothbrushes, spoons, and razor blades; and who are also more

Oropharyngeal foreign bodies

Most ingested FBs do not become impacted in the oropharynx. The most common exceptions are fish or chicken bones (Fig. 1), although any sharp or irregular object may become impacted.13, 14, 15, 16 These objects most often lodge in the soft tissue at the base of the tongue, but may also be found in other areas such as the tonsil or piriform sinus.13 Minor lacerations and abrasions are common and self-limited. If the patient is drooling or is unable to tolerate oral intake of liquids, the

Overview

The esophagus is a common site for impaction of FBs that are accidentally or purposefully swallowed. Most patients will present with minor irritation and an FB sensation, others will have more severe symptoms, and rarely the impacted FB may result in a life-threatening airway obstruction. The mucosa of the esophagus does not tolerate retained FBs well. Over time edema, necrosis, then infection or perforation occur. Some retained FBs may become less symptomatic over time; however, retained

Stomach and duodenal foreign bodies

The vast majority of FBs that enter the stomach pass through the entire GI tract uneventfully. Objects longer than 5 cm may have difficulty negotiating the tight curve of the duodenum, and objects larger than 2 cm in diameter may have difficulty passing the pylorus or ileocecal valve.106, 107 Less than 1% of FBs that enter the stomach cause perforation of the bowel108; however, some investigators describe an intestinal perforation rate of 35% with sharp objects (usually at the ileocecal valve)

Foreign bodies of the small and large intestine

Once in the small intestine, the most common impaction point is the ileocecal valve, followed by the hepatic and splenic flexures. Sharp objects tend to turn so that the blunt end leads and the sharp end trails.5 Management of sharp FBs in the intestine includes daily radiographs to document progression of the FB. If there is no distal progression over a 3-day period or if the patient becomes symptomatic, emergent surgical consultation should be obtained.5

Rectal foreign bodies

A wide variety of rectal FBs as well as complications from retained FBs have been reported. Anorectal FBs may infrequently be the result of an orally ingested sharp object that becomes impacted; however, the majority are the result of objects that are inserted through the anal canal.6, 129 Sharp ingested FBs usually present with symptoms of impaction such as bleeding, perforation, or abscess. The patient does not usually remember the ingestion and the object is identified during surgery.

Most

Anorectal emergencies

Anorectal disorders are commonly encountered in the ED setting. While the minority is life-threatening, there are many conditions that cause considerable discomfort. An understanding of anorectal anatomy is essential to understanding the disease processes that occur in this region. This section focuses on diseases that are commonly encountered or may require emergent management.

Summary

Ingested FBs are usually benign, but impacted FBs are potentially life-threatening. The ED management of FBs in the GI tract varies depending on the nature of the object, its anatomic location, and the symptoms experienced by the patient.

Anorectal disorders are frequently encountered in the ED. An understanding of anorectal anatomy and common disorders allows the emergency physician to provide relief and resolution in the majority of cases.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (196)

  • R.M. Evans et al.

    The lateral neck radiograph in suspected impacted fishbones—does it have a role?

    Clin Radiol

    (1992)
  • A.J. Lue et al.

    Use of plain radiography and computed tomography to identify fish bone foreign bodies

    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    (2000)
  • L.L. Flom et al.

    Radiologic evaluation of foreign bodies

    Emerg Med Clin North Am

    (1992)
  • C. Gracia et al.

    Diagnosis and management of ingested foreign bodies: a ten-year experience

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1984)
  • J.E. Kelley et al.

    A safe and cost-effective protocol for the management of esophageal coins in children

    J Pediatr Surg

    (1993)
  • F.J. Vizcarrondo et al.

    Foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1983)
  • R. Taylor

    Esophageal foreign bodies

    Emerg Med Clin North Am

    (1987)
  • D. Weissberg et al.

    Foreign bodies in the esophagus

    Ann Thorac Surg

    (2007)
  • A. Bhasin et al.

    Esophageal stenosis, a rare complication of coin ingestion: case report

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2004)
  • D. Hodge et al.

    Coin ingestion: does every child need a radiograph?

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1985)
  • G.M. Eisen et al.

    Guideline for the management of ingested foreign bodies

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2002)
  • P. Bailey

    Pediatric esophageal foreign body with minimal symptomatology

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1983)
  • G.G. Ginsberg

    Management of ingested foreign objects and food bolus impactions

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1995)
  • Y. Akazawa et al.

    The management of possible fishbone ingestion

    Auris Nasus Larynx

    (2004)
  • P.J. Berggreen et al.

    Techniques and complications of esophageal foreign body extraction in children and adults

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1993)
  • H.C. Mofenson et al.

    Ingestion of small flat disc batteries

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1983)
  • B.V. Nahman et al.

    Asymptomatic esophageal perforation by a coin in a child

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1984)
  • M.H. Wu et al.

    Aortoesophageal fistula induced by foreign bodies

    Ann Thorac Surg

    (1992)
  • G.P. Conners et al.

    Conservative management of pediatric distal esophageal coins

    J Emerg Med

    (1996)
  • S. Ginaldi

    Removal of esophageal foreign bodies using a Foley catheter in adults

    Am J Emerg Med

    (1985)
  • C.M. Calkins et al.

    Cost analysis in the management of esophageal coins: endoscopy versus bougienage

    J Pediatr Surg

    (1999)
  • H.C. Emslander et al.

    Efficiency of esophageal bougienage by emergency physicians in pediatric coin ingestion

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1996)
  • W.A. Bonadio et al.

    Esophageal bougienage technique for coin ingestion in children

    J Pediatr Surg

    (1988)
  • J.L. Arms et al.

    Safety and efficacy of a protocol using bougienage or endoscopy for the management of coins acutely lodged in the esophagus: a large case series

    Ann Emerg Med

    (2008)
  • T. Zimmers et al.

    Use of gas-forming agents in esophageal food impactions

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1988)
  • M.S. Gibson

    Nitroglycerin use in esophageal disorders

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1980)
  • G.J. Goldberg

    Emergency department treatment of esophageal obstruction

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1980)
  • G.F. Schwartz et al.

    Ingested foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract

    Am Surg

    (1976)
  • J. Erbes et al.

    Foreign bodies in the alimentary tract of infants and children

    Appl Ther

    (1965)
  • W.C. Conway et al.

    Upper GI foreign body: an adult urban emergency hospital experience

    Surg Endosc

    (2007)
  • M.F. Lyons et al.

    Foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract

    Med Clin North Am

    (1993)
  • E.C. Rosenow

    Foreign bodies of the esophagus

  • N.G. Velitchkov et al.

    Ingested foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract: retrospective analysis of 542 cases

    World J Surg

    (1996)
  • I. Wu et al.

    Value of lateral neck radiography for ingested foreign bodies using the likelihood ratio

    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    (2008)
  • P. Nandi et al.

    Foreign body in the oesophagus: review of 2394 cases

    Br J Surg

    (1978)
  • J.J. Phillipps et al.

    Swallowed foreign bodies

    J Laryngol Otol

    (1988)
  • N.S. Jones et al.

    Foreign bodies in the throat: a prospective study of 388 cases

    J Laryngol Otol

    (1991)
  • A.A. Connolly et al.

    Ingested foreign bodies: patient-guided localization is a useful clinical tool

    Clin Otolaryngol

    (1992)
  • I. Braverman et al.

    The role of CT imaging in the evaluation of cervical esophageal foreign bodies

    J Otolaryngol

    (1993)
  • P.C. Sundgren et al.

    Value of radiography in the management of possible fishbone ingestion

    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

    (1994)
  • Cited by (56)

    • Foreign body and anorectal trauma

      2019, Anorectal Disorders: Diagnosis and Non-Surgical Treatments
    • Conservative management of ingested foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract

      2023, Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text