Elsevier

Environmental Research

Volume 150, October 2016, Pages 8-13
Environmental Research

Noise sensitivity: Symptoms, health status, illness behavior and co-occurring environmental sensitivities

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.05.029Get rights and content

Highlights

  • People with self-reported noise sensitivity experience multiple non-specific symptoms.

  • They also report comparatively poorer health and increased illness behavior.

  • Co-occurrence with other environmental sensitivities is moderate to high.

  • Road-traffic noise and GP-registered morbidity did not account for these results.

Abstract

Epidemiological evidence on the symptomatic profile, health status and illness behavior of people with subjective sensitivity to noise is still scarce. Also, it is unknown to what extent noise sensitivity co-occurs with other environmental sensitivities such as multi-chemical sensitivity and sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EMF). A cross-sectional study performed in the Netherlands, combining self-administered questionnaires and electronic medical records of non-specific symptoms (NSS) registered by general practitioners (GP) allowed us to explore this further. The study sample consisted of 5806 participants, drawn from 21 general practices. Among participants, 722 (12.5%) responded “absolutely agree” to the statement “I am sensitive to noise”, comprising the high noise-sensitive (HNS) group. Compared to the rest of the sample, people in the HNS group reported significantly higher scores on number and duration of self-reported NSS, increased psychological distress, decreased sleep quality and general health, more negative symptom perceptions and higher prevalence of healthcare contacts, GP-registered NSS and prescriptions for antidepressants and benzodiazepines. These results remained robust after adjustment for demographic, residential and lifestyle characteristics, objectively measured nocturnal noise exposure from road-traffic and GP-registered morbidity. Co-occurrence rates with other environmental sensitivities varied between 9% and 50%. Individuals with self-declared sensitivity to noise are characterized by high prevalence of multiple NSS, poorer health status and increased illness behavior independently of noise exposure levels. Findings support the notion that different types of environmental sensitivities partly overlap.

Introduction

Noise sensitivity refers to the internal states of any individual which increase their degree of reactivity to noise in general (Job, 1999) through pathways related to physiological, psychological, including attitudinal characteristics or pathways related to life style or activity patterns. There are a number of competing and complementary hypotheses regarding the etiology of noise sensitivity and its potential role (van Kamp et al., 2013): It could be a result of physical illness, injury, psychological disorder, a partial indicator of genetically related vulnerability or acquired vulnerability to environmental stressors, or even a side-effect of prescribed medication (van Kamp and Davies, 2013). Noise sensitivity might directly influence health or moderate the relationship between noise and well-being (Stansfeld, 1992, Heinonen-Guzejev et al., 2007; Fyhri et al., 2009; Kishikawa et al., 2009). It has been linked to poor perceived health and increased psychological distress, morbidity, medication use and risk of disability pension (Stansfeld et al., 1993, Heinonen-Guzejev et al., 2004, Heinonen-Guzejev et al., 2013, Stansfeld and Shipley, 2015). There is also the notion that noise sensitivity could be part of the broader spectrum of subjective environmental sensitivities attributed to low, compared to the established safety limits, exposure levels to environmental agents such as chemicals and electromagnetic fields (EMF) (Nordin et al., 2013, Palmquist et al., 2014).

People with these environmental sensitivities are often characterized by increased report of non-specific symptoms (NSS) (Das-Munshi et al., 2006, Staudenmayer et al., 2003). Such symptoms occur in various organ systems and can be caused by multiple factors, often unknown and unrelated to the attributed (environmental) cause. When presented in primary care, between 30% and 50% of NSS cannot be explained by a medical diagnosis (Kroenke and Price, 1993, Barsky and Borus, 1999). The term “medically unexplained” is often used to describe such complaints in clinical practice (Henningsen et al., 2011). Decreased physical functioning, increased illness behavior (particularly related to alternative therapies) and negative symptom perceptions have also been observed in some environmentally sensitive groups (Baliatsas et al., 2014).

However, it is not clear yet whether these features are also common in people with noise sensitivity. Noise-sensitive groups have been understudied, are generally underrepresented in study populations and evidence on differential characteristics is scarce (van Kamp and Davies, 2013), since there is limited research on their symptomatic profile, psychological relevant characteristics and co-occurrence with other environmental sensitivities. The present study addresses three main questions: (1) Do people with self-reported noise sensitivity experience more symptoms and symptoms of longer duration compared to the broader population? (2) Do noise-sensitive individuals differ from the broader population in terms of symptom report, symptom perceptions, health status indicators and illness behavior? (3) To what extent do noise- sensitive people report other environmental sensitivities as well?

Section snippets

Participants and procedure

Two data collection methods were combined in a population study conducted in 2011 in the Netherlands, originally designed to assess the association between EMF and NSS (Baliatsas et al., 2015): a questionnaire survey entitled “Living environment, technology and health” and electronic medical records (EMR) of adult citizens registered in 21 general practices. It is obligatory for every citizen in the Netherlands to be registered at a general practice; the population listed in family practice can

Non-response and descriptive analysis

Detailed results from non-response analysis were described elsewhere (Baliatsas et al., 2014, Baliatsas et al., 2015). In short, participants were younger, higher educated and reported better general health.

There was no significant difference regarding gender distribution. After excluding cases (n=127) with incomplete data related to the case definition of noise sensitivity, 5806 respondents were available for analysis; n=722 (12.5%) comprised the HNS group. Sample characteristics are presented

Discussion

The primary aim of this study was to give insight into the symptomatic profile and health characteristics of people with self-reported noise sensitivity. Compared to the rest of the sample, the prevalence of self-reported and GP-registered NSS and registered prescriptions for antidepressants and benzodiazepines was considerably higher in the HNS group. Noise-sensitive individuals also reported more chronic NSS, increased psychological distress, decreased sleep quality and general health, more

Conclusions

The view that noise sensitivity might at least partly overlap with the broader concept of self-declared environmental sensitivity is corroborated by the current findings, which add to existing evidence that environmentally sensitive groups share common characteristics such as: (1) High co-occurrence rate with other sensitivities (2) Decreased health status, illness behavior and more negative symptom perceptions, (3) Higher prevalence and duration of all symptoms in different organ systems, even

Competing interests statement

The authors have no competing interests to report.

Acknowledgements

Data were collected within the framework of the project EMPHASIS “Non-specific physical symptoms in relation to actual and perceived exposure to EMF and the underlying mechanisms”, funded by The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) (project number: 85100002). The study sponsor had no involvement in study design and data collection and interpretation. We gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of participants and GPs. In addition, we would like to thank Dr. Gert

References (46)

  • Battaner-Moro, J., Barlow, C., Wright, P., 2010. A quiet area accessibility metric for the Southamptonurban...
  • B. van den Berg et al.

    Symptoms and related functioning in a traumatized community

    Arch. Intern. Med.

    (2005)
  • H. Booi et al.

    Quiet areas and the need for quietness in Amsterdam

    Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health

    (2012)
  • European Commission. 2002. Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating...
  • Goldberg, D.P. The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Maudsley Monograph No. 21. Oxford, Oxford...
  • M. Heinonen-Guzejev et al.

    Somatic and psychological characteristics of noise-sensitive adults in Finland

    Arch. Environ. Health: Int. J.

    (2004)
  • M. Heinonen-Guzejev et al.

    Noise sensitivity and disability retirement: a longitudinal twin study

    J. Occup. Environ. Med.

    (2013)
  • P. Henningsen et al.

    Terminology, classification and concepts

  • N. Hoeymans et al.

    Measuring mental health of the Dutch population: a comparison of the GHQ-12 and the MHI-5

    Health Qual. Life Outcomes

    (2004)
  • K. Hume et al.

    Complaints and annoyance caused by aircraft operations: temporal patterns and individual bias

    Noise Health

    (2002)
  • R.F.S. Job

    Noise sensitivity as a factor influencing human reaction to noise

    Noise Health

    (1999)
  • H. Kishikawa et al.

    Noise sensitivity and subjective health: questionnaire study conducted along trunk roads in Kusatsu, Japan

    Noise Health

    (2009)
  • L. Kroenke et al.

    Symptoms in the community. Prevalence, classification, and psychiatric comorbidity

    Arch. Intern. Med.

    (1993)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text