EducationTraining, Research, and Working Conditions for Urology Residents in Germany: A Contemporary Survey
Introduction
Excellent training of urology residents is crucial to secure both high-quality patient care and the future of our specialty. Accordingly, the European Association of Urology, as the largest urology organisation in the world, is strategically expanding on educational activities for residents, including their flagship European Urology Residents Education Programme [1]. Studies in the research field of resident training have emerged mainly in the USA and UK, focusing on the efficacy of training models and simulation [2]. In subspecialty fields such as robotic surgery, multinational collaboration approaches have been undertaken to design an international core curriculum [3], [4].
Despite these efforts, a comprehensive assessment of the current state of urology residents in various aspects of training is often lacking. According to the principles of quality management, the assessment of the actual state of residency trainings belongs to the first step (observe) before the consecutive steps plan, do, check, and act [5]. The results of a quality assessment of residency training then build the foundation for a quality improvement curriculum, both nationally as well as internationally [6]. Recently, survey results on the scientific activity, surgical exposure, and overall satisfaction of 324 urology residents in Italy were reported [7]. Consequently, more international studies are needed to assess urology residency training in order to tailor specific actions to improve it.
To address these unmet needs, we aimed to comprehensively assess the surgical training, research opportunities, and working conditions among urology residents in Germany.
Section snippets
Patients and methods
We created a 29-item online survey in German on the surgical training, research opportunities, and working conditions of urology residents in Germany. Methodologically, we followed the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys [8]. We used the online platform at www.surveymonkey.com (Surveymonkey, Portland, OR, USA) to design the survey.
The survey consisted of the four domains–baseline characteristics, surgical training, research opportunities, and working conditions–and is provided
Baseline characteristics
A total of 472 out of 721 residents completed the online survey (response rate 65%). Table 1 lists the baseline characteristics of the study population. Among the responders there were slightly more female (55%) than male (45%) urology residents. Responders across the five years of postgraduate training followed a normal distribution.
Surgical training
Figure 1A illustrates that the cumulative completed case volume for all surgeries increased as residents progressed in their training. The median number of
Discussion
We conducted a 29-item online survey to assess the surgical training, research opportunities, and working conditions among urology residents in Germany. Our survey yielded 472 survey responses (response rate 65%) and has several principal findings.
The first principal finding is that the surgical case volume among urology residents in Germany is low. The median number of cumulative completed cases for PGY-5 residents was only 113 across surgeries from low to high complexity and major surgeries
Conclusions
Surgical exposure is low among German urology residents and comprises an adequate surgical caseload for minor surgery, a low caseload for medium-complexity surgery, and virtually no caseload for major surgery. Psychosocial work-related stress is high for the vast majority of residents indicating the need for structural improvements in German urology residency training.
Author contributions: Hendrik Borgmann had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity
References (29)
- et al.
Current status of simulation and training models in urological surgery: a systematic review
J Urol
(2016) - et al.
Pilot Validation study of the European Association of Urology robotic training curriculum
Eur Urol
(2015) - et al.
The European Association of Urology robotic training curriculum: an update
Eur Urol Focus
(2016) - et al.
The unmet need for a national surgical quality improvement curriculum: a systematic review
J Surg Educ
(2014) - et al.
Training and general and financial conditions of European residents in urology: an international survey
Eur Urol
(2004) - et al.
Complications following common inpatient urological procedures: temporal trend analysis from 2000 to 2010
Eur Urol
(2016) - et al.
Training, simulation, the learning curve, and how to reduce complications in urology
Eur Urol Focus
(2016) - European Association of Urology. European Urology Residency Education Programme. Available at:...
The New Economics for Industry, Government and Education
(1993)- Cocci A PG, Gandagliac G, Rizzod M, Esperto F, Parnanzini D, Pietropaolo A. Urology residency training in Italy:...
Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)
J Med Internet Res
A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort-reward imbalance
Int Arch Occup Environ Health.
Resident operative experience in general surgery, plastic surgery, and urology 5 years after implementation of the ACGME duty hour policy
Ann Surg
Surgical case volume in Canadian urology residency: a comparison of trends in open and minimally invasive surgical experience
J Endourol
Cited by (23)
Current status of urological training and differences between institutions
2022, Actas Urologicas EspanolasUrology residency training in Greece. Results from the first national resident survey
2021, Actas Urologicas EspanolasThe definition of ideal training of a urology resident from two different perspectives: trainees vs professors. Is there agreement in their idea of good training?
2023, Central European Journal of UrologyBasic Laparoscopic Skills Training
2022, Practical Simulation in Urology