Elsevier

European Urology Focus

Volume 4, Issue 5, September 2018, Pages 643-647
European Urology Focus

Grey Zone
Rationale for Robotic-assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Obstruction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.07.007Get rights and content

Section snippets

Surgical treatment of large prostate adenoma: current scenario

Surgical intervention is recommended in the setting of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) refractory to medical therapy or associated with urinary retention, recurrent urinary tract infections, recurrent hematuria, impaired renal function secondary to obstructive uropathy, and bladder stones. In the specific case of large prostate glands, commonly defined as ≥80 ml, the European Association of Urology guidelines recommend open simple prostatectomy (OSP), holmium laser enucleation of the prostate

Evolution of RASP

RASP was first described by Sotelo et al in 2008 [7]. Since then, the procedure has gradually been implemented at several institutions worldwide [8]. Parallel to the clinical implementation of this procedure, there has also been a steady increase in the number of publications on RASP, especially over the past 5 yr (Fig. 1).

An abundance of RASP techniques has been described in the literature over the last decade, each featuring specific technical nuances (Table 1). The transperitoneal approach

Outcomes

Over 1200 RASP cases have been reported to date (Fig. 2), which testifies the fact that the procedure is safe and effective, and it has well passed the “investigational” stage. In the largest series to date [8], a multicenter study including 487 cases, median operative time was 154 min, median estimated blood loss was 200 ml, and median length of stay was 2 d. In terms of functional outcomes, median International Prostate Symptom Score declined from 23 to 7, median Qmax increased from 8 to 25 

Why and when RASP can be an attractive option

The rationale behind the shift from open surgery to minimally invasive techniques for the surgical management of large-gland BPH is driven by the quest of obtaining comparable function outcomes with lower perioperative morbidity [1], [2]. While HoLEP has certainly stood the test of time by proving its clinical efficacy [3], it requires specific instrumentation, and its steep learning curve remains the main barrier to its implementation [4]. For this reason, there has been an interest in other

Grey areas

While representing an attractive option in general, some “grey” areas for RASP remain. The lack of a standardized technique can be regarded as a limitation, and therefore effort should be made to standardize the procedure to allow better reproducibility and teaching. Moreover, in absence of randomized trials, there is still a lack of level I evidence. While the few available comparative studies can partially obviate to this issue, more efforts should be made in this area of clinical research.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (21)

  • M. Oelke et al.

    EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction

    Eur Urol

    (2013)
  • Foster HE, Barry MJ, Dahm P, et al. Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic...
  • M.W. Vincent et al.

    HoLEP has come of age

    World J Urol

    (2015)
  • G. Robert et al.

    Multicentre prospective evaluation of the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP)

    BJU Int

    (2016)
  • R. Naspro et al.

    From “gold standard” resection to reproducible “future standard” endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: what we know about anatomical enucleation

    Minerva Urol Nefrol

    (2017)
  • J.J. Pariser et al.

    National trends of simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia with an analysis of risk factors for adverse perioperative outcomes

    Urology

    (2015)
  • R. Sotelo et al.

    Robotic simple prostatectomy

    J Urol

    (2008)
  • R. Autorino et al.

    Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: a European-American multi-institutional analysis

    Eur Urol

    (2015)
  • J.U. Stolzenburg et al.

    Extraperitoneal approach for robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy

    Urology

    (2014)
  • M.N. Patel et al.

    Robot-assisted laparoscopic simple anatomic prostatectomy

    Urol Clin North Am

    (2014)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (11)

  • Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: A single-center preliminary study in Korea

    2022, Prostate International
    Citation Excerpt :

    This complication was frequently reported in other studies. Autorino et al.14 in their comparative study reported bladder neck contracture in three out of 487 patients (0.6%) and three out of 843 patients (0.35%) in RASP and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy groups, respectively. On the other hand, Sorokin et al.25 reported bladder neck contracture in two and zero patients among OSP and RASP groups, respectively.

  • Management of prostate cancer after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate

    2021, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
    Citation Excerpt :

    Ten of the 12 patients undergoing HoLEP for BPH and CaP were treated with the intent to improve their LUTS and determine if this subtotal prostatectomy might be curative, and with relatively short oncologic outcomes, the patients are without evidence of disease. Clinical investigation of robotic subtotal prostatectomy is in progress, indicating that other investigators are pursuing similar approaches [26,27]. Ongoing surveillance will determine the risk of CaP developing in the remaining prostatic tissue.

View all citing articles on Scopus

These authors contributed equally.

View full text