The effect of erythropoietin on cognition in affective disorders – Associations with baseline deficits and change in subjective cognitive complaints

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.05.009Get rights and content

Abstract

This is a secondary data analysis from our erythropoietin (EPO) trials. We examine (I) whether EPO improves speed of complex cognitive processing across bipolar and unipolar disorder, (II) if objective and subjective baseline cognitive impairment increases patients׳ chances of treatment-efficacy and (III) if cognitive improvement correlates with better subjective cognitive function, quality of life and socio-occupational capacity. Patients with unipolar or bipolar disorder were randomized to eight weekly EPO (N=40) or saline (N=39) infusions. Cognition, mood, quality of life and socio-occupational capacity were assessed at baseline (week 1), after treatment completion (week 9) and at follow-up (week 14). We used repeated measures analysis of covariance to investigate the effect of EPO on speed of complex cognitive processing. With logistic regression, we examined whether baseline cognitive impairment predicted treatment-efficacy. Pearson correlations were used to assess associations between objective and subjective cognition, quality of life and socio-occupational capacity. EPO improved speed of complex cognitive processing across affective disorders at weeks 9 and 14 (p≤0.05). In EPO-treated patients, baseline cognitive impairment increased the odds of treatment-efficacy on cognition at weeks 9 and 14 by a factor 9.7 (95% CI:1.2-81.1) and 9.9 (95% CI:1.1-88.4), respectively (p≤0.04). Subjective cognitive complaints did not affect chances of treatment-efficacy (p≥0.45). EPO-associated cognitive improvement correlated with reduced cognitive complaints but not with quality of life or socio-occupational function. As the analyses were performed post-hoc, findings are only hypothesis-generating. In conclusion, pro-cognitive effects of EPO occurred across affective disorders. Neuropsychological screening for cognitive dysfunction may be warranted in future cognition trials.

Introduction

Cognitive deficits are common across unipolar and bipolar disorder and often persist after clinical remission from acute mood episodes (Arts et al., 2008, Bortolato et al., 2016). There are currently no available treatments to directly target cognitive dysfunction in affective disorders although some candidate compounds seem promising (for reviews see Bortolato et al. (2016) and Miskowiak et al. under review). A particularly interesting candidate treatment is recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO), which has neuroprotective effects, stimulates neuroplasticity and improves cognition in preclinical models and across several neuropsychiatric patient groups (for reviews see Miskowiak et al. (2012), Sargin et al. (2010), and Sirén et al. (2009)). We previously demonstrated in a randomized placebo-controlled trial that (EPO) improves speed of complex cognitive processing across attention, memory and executive function in partially remitted patients with bipolar disorder (BD) (Miskowiak et al., 2014a). In a parallel trial we investigated the effects of EPO on mood symptoms in moderately depressed patients with treatment-resistant unipolar disorder (UD), and observed a mood-independent improvement of verbal memory in EPO versus saline treated patients (tertiary outcome) (Miskowiak et al., 2014b). Pooling verbal memory data from these two studies showed that the effect of EPO on verbal memory was comparable across UD and BD (Miskowiak et al., in press). However, it remains to be investigated whether the observed effects of EPO on “speed of complex cognitive processing” across several cognitive domains in BD (Miskowiak et al., 2014a), also occur across unipolar and bipolar disorder. Indeed, it cannot be assumed that a pro-cognitive effect of an intervention in one patient group necessarily applies to other groups, as illustrated by the discrepancy between meta-analytic evidence for beneficial effects of cognitive remediation (CR) on cognition in schizophrenia, but lack of cognitive benefits of CR in BD patients (Demant et al., 2015b). Interestingly, we recently demonstrated that baseline cognitive dysfunction substantially increased patients׳ chances of achieving EPO treatment efficacy on verbal memory in a pooled sample of UD and BD patients (Miskowiak et al., in press). Subjective cognitive complaints at baseline and longer illness duration were also associated with a small but significant increase in the odds for EPO treatment efficacy on cognition. These preliminary findings suggest that treatments targeting memory dysfunction may be particularly efficacious in patients with baseline cognitive deficits and greater illness progression, in line with the staging and allostatic load models of affective disorders (Berk et al., 2011, Grande et al., 2015, Kapczinski et al., 2008, Vieta et al., 2013).

The present study builds on these findings by investigating (I) whether the observed effects of EPO on speed of complex cognitive processing are specific to BD, or if they occur across diagnostic groups of affective disorders, (II) whether objective cognitive dysfunction and/or subjective cognitive complaints at baseline will increase EPO-treated patients׳ chances of achieving a clinically relevant improvement in cognition, and (III) whether treatment-related improvement in objective cognition is accompanied by increase in subjective cognitive function, quality of life and socio-occupational capacity. Insight into these questions has implications for future clinical trials of EPO by elucidating who is likely to show cognitive benefits of EPO treatment, and may also inform the design of other trials targeting cognition.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants were recruited through the Clinic for Affective Disorders, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, and through relevant websites. Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) was used to confirm the ICD-10 diagnosis. More extensive details about the recruitment procedure can be found in Miskowiak et al., 2014a, Miskowiak et al., 2014b.

The study included 79 patients consisting of BD patients in partial remission (N=43), defined as Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-items

Missing data and sample characteristics

Data on education was missing for one patient included in the EPO group, and data for this patient was therefore not included in the binary logistic regression analyses (research question II). Data for total number of mood episodes was missing for five patients in the EPO group, and these patients were not included in the multiple regressions analyses (research question II), or in the logistic regression analyses (research question III). Data was missing for the RVP for 11 participants (EPO: N

Discussion

This secondary analysis of data from our EPO trials in BD and UD aimed to determine whether EPO-associated improvement in speed of complex cognitive processing occurs across both mood disorders, if objective cognitive dysfunction and/or subjective cognitive complaints at baseline increase patients׳ chances of achieving a clinically relevant improvement in cognition, and whether treatment-related objective cognition correlates with better subjective cognitive function, quality of life and

Role of the funding source

The study was funded by the Danish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Higher Education, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Beckett Fonden, and Savværksejer Juhl׳s Mindefond. The Lundbeck Foundation has provided half of Dr. Miskowiak׳s post-doctorate salary at the Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen (2012–2015) for her to do full-time research in this period. Funders no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to

Contributors

KWM and LVK were responsible for the original study design, and KWM drafted the original protocol. KWM as principal investigator had the overall responsibility for the study, and ensured the necessary funding for the study.

KWM and CVO were responsible for the statistical analysis plan. CVO had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. CVO conducted all statistical analyses under supervision of KWM,

Conflicts of interest

KWM reports having received consultancy fees from Lundbeck. LVK has within recent three years been a consultant for Lundbeck and Astra Zeneca, MV has within the recent three years been a consultant for Astra Zeneca, Lundbeck and Servier. CVO has no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

The Lundbeck Foundation is acknowledged for providing support for KWM׳s postdoctoral salary from 2012–2015 for her to do full-time research in this period.

References (45)

  • R. Tabarés-Seisdedos et al.

    Neurocognitive and clinical predictors of functional outcome in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder at one-year follow-up

    J. Affect. Disord.

    (2008)
  • E. Vieta et al.

    The clinical implications of cognitive impairment and allostatic load in bipolar disorder

    Eur. Psychiatry: J. Assoc. Eur. Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • Army Individual Test Battery

    Manual of Directions and Scoring

    (1944)
  • B. Arts et al.

    Meta-analyses of cognitive functioning in euthymic bipolar patients and their first-degree relatives

    Psychol. Med.

    (2008)
  • M. Berk et al.

    Does stage of illness impact treatment response in bipolar disorder? Empirical treatment data and their implication for the staging model and early intervention

    Bipolar Disord.

    (2011)
  • C.M. Bonnin et al.

    Effects of functional remediation on neurocognitively impaired bipolar patients: enhancement of verbal memory

    Psychol. Med.

    (2016)
  • B. Bortolato et al.

    Cognitive remission: a novel objective for the treatment of major depression?

    BMC Med.

    (2016)
  • K.E. Burdick et al.

    Placebo-controlled adjunctive trial of pramipexole in patients with bipolar disorder: targeting cognitive dysfunction

    J. Clin. Psychiatry

    (2012)
  • K.E. Burdick et al.

    Assessing cognitive function in bipolar disorder: challenges and recommendations for clinical trial design

    J. Clin. Psychiatry

    (2015)
  • K.M. Demant et al.

    Effects of short-term cognitive remediation on cognitive dysfunction in partially or fully remitted individuals with bipolar disorder: results of a randomised controlled trial

    PLoS ONE

    (2015)
  • H. Ehrenreich et al.

    Exploring recombinant human erythropoietin in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis

    (2007)
  • H. Ehrenreich et al.

    Improvement of cognitive functions in chronic schizophrenic patients by recombinant human erythropoietin

    Mol. Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • Cited by (37)

    • Influence of pre-treatment structural brain measures on effects of action-based cognitive remediation on executive function in partially or fully remitted patients with bipolar disorder

      2022, European Neuropsychopharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, we currently have little insight into which patient characteristics predict greater cognitive benefits in response to CR, which would be important for future pre-screening for these interventions. Some studies suggest that greater cognitive impairment at baseline is a predictor of treatment response on cognition to both CR and pharmacological treatments (Burdick et al., 2012; Ott et al., 2016). In accordance with this, we observed that deficits within executive function at baseline was associated with greater treatment effects of ABCR in this domain in BD (Ott et al., 2020, 2021).

    • Neuronal and cognitive predictors of improved executive function following action-based cognitive remediation in patients with bipolar disorder

      2021, European Neuropsychopharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      As expected, subjective cognitive difficulties at baseline did not influence ABCR-related cognitive improvements. This is in line with previous findings of either weak (Miskowiak et al., 2016b) or no influence (Ott et al., 2016) of pre-treatment subjective cognitive complaints on cognitive benefits of EPO. These findings are consistent with evidence for a poor association between subjective cognitive complaints and objective cognitive impairment (Demant et al., 2015; Jensen et al., 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text