Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:34:44.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Continuity Across Inpatient and Outpatient Mental Health Care or Specialisation of Teams? A Systematic Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

S. Omer ,
S. Priebe  and
D. Giacco
Get access

Abstract

Background:

A central question for the organisation of mental health care is whether the same clinicians should be responsible for a patient's care across inpatient and outpatient settings (continuity of care) or if there should be separate teams (specialisation). Current reforms in Europe are inconsistent on which to favour, and are based on little research evidence. This review is the first systematic appraisal of the existing evidence comparing continuity of care and specialisation across inpatient and outpatient mental health care.

Method:

A systematic search for studies of any design comparing mental health care systems based on continuity or specialisation of care was performed. Differences in clinical, social and cost-effective outcomes, and the views and experiences of patients and staff were assessed using narrative synthesis.

Results:

Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies had methodological shortcomings, but findings point towards reduced length and number of hospitalisations, and faster or more flexible transitions between services in continuity systems. Survey and qualitative findings suggest advantages of both systems, whilst patients and staff appear to prefer a continuity system.

Conclusion:

The evidence base suggests better outcomes and stakeholder preferences for continuity of care systems, but the quality of existing studies is insufficient to draw definitive conclusions. Higher quality comparative studies across various settings and population groups are urgently needed.

Keywords

PsychiatryMental health servicesPolicyOrganisationIntegratedFunctional
Type
Review
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , February 2015 , pp. 258 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier Masson SAS 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beezhold, J., Williams, P., Taylor, J., Harris, A., Kandasamy, S.. P03-14 – A quasi-experimental controlled intervention to reduce violence on an acute psychiatric ward [abstract]. Eur Psychiatry 2010;25 (Suppl 1):873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beezhold, J., Puvanachandra, R., Duckworth, A., Croxford, A., Currie, J., Kandasamy, S., et al.The impact of hospitalists on adverse incidents in acute psychiatry: a study of 5019 admissions in Norfolk, UK from 2002–2010 [abstract]. In: American Psychiatric Association editors. Proceedings of the 165th annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association; 2012 May 5–10; Philadelphia, USA. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2012. 278.Google Scholar
Begum, M., Brown, K., Pelosi, A., Crabb, J., McTaggart, J., Mitchell, C., et al.Survey of patients’ view on functional split of consultant psychiatrists. BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13 :362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bröcheler, A., Bergmann, F., Schneider, F.. Models of mental health care in psychiatry across sectoral borders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2009;259 (2):227–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burns, T.. The dog that failed to bark. Psychiatr Bull 2010;34 (9):361–363.Google Scholar
Burns, T., Priebe, S.. Mental health care systems and their characteristics: a proposal. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996;94 (6):381–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Haines, A., Kinmonth, A.L., Sandercock, P., Spiegelhalter, D., et al.Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000;321 (7262):694–696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group. Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. EPOC 2013 [cited 2014 Jun 16]. Available from: http://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/uploads/Suggested%20risk%20of%20bias%20criteria%20for%20EPOC%20reviews.pdf.Google Scholar
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group. What study designs should be included in an EPOC review and what should they be called?. EPOC 2013 [cited 2014 Jun 16]. Available from: http://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/uploads/EPOC%20Study%20Designs%20About.pdf.Google Scholar
Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., Petticrew, M.. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337 :a1655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dratcu, L.. Acute in-patient psychiatry: the right time for a new specialty?. Psychiatr Bull 2006;30 (11):401–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, M., Grimshaw, J., Campbell, M., Ramsay, C.. Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12 (1):47–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S.The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2011 [Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011), cited 2014 Jun 16] http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/.Google Scholar
Juven-Wetzler, A., Bar-Ziv, D., Cwikel-Hamzany, S., Abudy, A., Peri, N., Zohar, J.. A pilot study of the “Continuation of Care” model in “revolving-door” patients. Eur Psychiatry 2012;27 (4):229–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kar, N., Singh, S.P., Tungaraza, T.E., Roy, S., O’Brien, M., Cooper, D., et al.Staff satisfaction in the functionalisation of psychiatric in-patient care. Mental Illness 2012;4 (1):e6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karow, A., Reimer, J., Konig, H.H., Heider, D., Bock, T., Huber, C., et al.Cost-effectiveness of 12-month therapeutic assertive community treatment as part of integrated care versus standard care in patients with schizophrenia treated with quetiapine immediate release (ACCESS trial). J Clin Psychiatry 2012;73 (3):e402–e408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khandaker, G., Cherukuru, S., Dibben, C., Ray, M.K.. From a sector-based service model to a functional one: qualitative study of staff perceptions. Psychiatr Bull 2009;33 (9):329–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, M.J., Barley, D.E.. Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy 2001;38 (4):357–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, M., Bock, T., Schottle, D., Golks, D., Meister, K., Rietschel, L., et al.Assertive community treatment as part of integrated care versus standard care: a 12-month trial in patients with first- and multiple-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders treated with quetiapine immediate release (ACCESS trial). J Clin Psychiatry 2010;71 (10):1313–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laugharne, R., Pant, M.. Sector and functional models of consultant care: in-patient satisfaction with psychiatrists. Psychiatr Bull 2012;36 (7):254–256.Google Scholar
Le Bas, J., King, R., Block, M.. The impact of mental health service integration on systemic function: a staff perspective. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1998;32 (5):666–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindgren, I., Falk Hogstedt, M., Cullberg, J.. Outpatient vs. comprehensive first-episode psychosis services, a 5-year follow-up of Soteria Nacka. Nord J Psychiatry 2006;60 (5):405–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lodge, G.. How did we let it come to this? A plea for the principle of continuity of care. Psychiatr Bull 2012;36 (10):361–363.Google Scholar
Lunt, N., Smith, R., Exworthy, M., Green, S.T., Horsfall, D., Mannion, R.Medical tourism: treatments, markets and health system implications: a scoping review. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2004 [cited 2014 Jun 6] http://www1.oecd.org/els/health-systems/48723982.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, D.J., Garske, J.P., Davis, M.K.. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000;68 (3):438–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellsop, G.W., Blair-West, G.W., Duraiappah, V.. The effect of a new integrated mental health service on hospitalisation. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1997;31 (4):480–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellsop, G.W., Lombard, H., Mathieson, P., Turner, A., O’Brien, G.. Waikato mental health service reorganisation: a model to reduce bed needs?. N Z Med J 2000;113 (1123):522–524.Google Scholar
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G.. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151 (4):264–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myklebust, L.H., Sørgaard, K., Bjorbekkmo, S., Nymann, A., Molvik, S., Olstad, R.. Bed utilization in two differently organized community mental health services in Northern Norway: the VELO-project. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2009;44 (7):550–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myklebust, L.H., Olstad, R., Bjorbekkmo, S., Eisemann, M., Wynn, R., Sorgaard, K.. Impact on continuity of care of decentralized versus partly centralized mental health care in Northern Norway. Int J Integr Care 2011;11 :e142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perris, C., Rodhe, K., Palm, A., Hellgren, S., Lilja, C., Söderman, H.. Fully integrated in- and out-patient services in a psychiatric sector. Soc Psychiatry 1985;20 (2):60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., et al.Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC Methods Programme Version. Lancaster: University of Lancaster; 2006. [cited 2014 Jun 16] http://www.lancs.ac.uk/shm/research/nssr/index.htm.Google Scholar
Priebe, S., Mccabe, R.. Therapeutic relationships in psychiatry: the basis of therapy or therapy in itself?. Int Rev Psychiatry 2008;20 (6):521–526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Psychiatrists and National Institute for Mental Health in England. New ways of working for psychiatrists: enhancing effective, person centered services through new ways of working in multidisciplinary and multi-agency contexts. Final report ‘But not the end of the story’. Department of Health; 2005 [cited 2014 Jun 16]. Available from: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/788/1/NWW_Psychs.pdf.Google Scholar
Singhal, A., Garg, D., Rana, A.K., Naheed, M.. Two consultants for one patient: service users’ and service providers’ views on “New Ways”. Psychiatr Bull 2010;34 (5):181–186.Google Scholar
Sloan, P.A., Asghar-Ali, A., Teague, A., Body, E., Kunik, M.E.. Psychiatric hospitalists and continuity of care: a comparison of two models. J Psychiatr Pract 2010;16 (3):170–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sytema, S., Micciolo, R., Tansella, M.. Service utilization by schizophrenic patients in Groningen and South Verona: an event-history analysis. Psychol Med 1996;26 (1):109–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sytema, S., Micciolo, R., Tansella, M.. Continuity of care for patients with schizophrenia and related disorders: a comparative South-Verona and Groningen case-register study. Psychol Med 1997;27 (6):1355–1362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vigod, S.N., Kurdyak, P.A., Dennis, C.-L., Leszcz, T., Taylor, V.H., Blumberger, D.M., et al.Transitional interventions to reduce early psychiatric readmissions in adults: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry 2013;202 (3):187–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wierdsma, A.I., Mulder, C.L.. Does mental health service integration affect compulsory admissions?. Int J Integr Care 2009;9 :e90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wooderson, S.C., Juruena, M.F., Fekadu, A., Commane, C., Donaldson, C., Cowan, M., et al.Prospective evaluation of specialist inpatient treatment for refractory affective disorders. J Affect Disord 2011;131 (1–3):92–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organisation. Mental health policy and service guidance package: the mental health context. World Health Organization; 2003. [cited 2014 Jun 16] http://www.who.int/mental_health/resources/en/context.PDF.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.