Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 53, Issue 1, January 2008, Pages 53-59
European Urology

Review – Incontinence
Pharmacologic Treatment of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence: Systematic Review of the Literature and Levels of Evidence

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.037Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) occurs in men and women. Pharmacologic treatment of female SUI has been beneficiary but the role of drug treatment in male SUI is controversial. This review evaluates the drug classes, the effects of these drugs in trials with male SUI, and the levels of evidence of the individual trials.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted searching for studies on male SUI published between 1966 and 2007. In retrieved articles, reference lists were hand-searched to identify additional articles. The level of evidence was judged according to the Oxford classification.

Results

This search found nine articles providing evidence that α-adrenoceptor agonists (ephedrine, phenylpropanolamine, midodrine), β2-adrenoceptor agonists (clenbuterol), and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (imipramine, duloxetine) have a potentially beneficial effect on male SUI. Most trials used only small numbers of patients and a mixed study population (men and women). The evidence level of most studies was low due to the lack of randomisation (case series or cohort studies, level 4). In contrast, the first high-level study to provide evidence in the treatment of male SUI was with duloxetine, a selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (randomised controlled study, level 1b). However, only one well-designed study has been published so far.

Conclusions

One high-level study with duloxetine in combination with pelvic floor muscle training shows preliminary but promising results in the treatment of male SUI. These results have to be confirmed in larger and well-designed trials to allow definite recommendations for the pharmacologic treatment of male SUI.

Introduction

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common symptom that affects both men and women. Even though it is not life-threatening, it has a significant impact on patients’ psychosocial well-being [1], [2] and quality of life (QoL) [3]. Compared to continent people, men and women with UI have a higher level of anxiety, lower QoL, and poorer life satisfaction [3]. The majority of epidemiologic studies have been conducted in women, confirming the highly prevalent nature of UI, impact on QoL, and frequency of medical consultations [4]. Therefore, UI might appear a problem predominantly of women. However, a review of prevalence studies estimated UI rates of 11–34% for older men and 3–5% for middle aged or younger men [5]. The male prevalence data have recently been confirmed in large surveys conducted mainly in the United States, where the overall prevalence of male UI was reported to be 12.7–17%, of whom 24.5% had stress UI (SUI) [6], [7].

The International Continence Society defines SUI as the complaint of involuntary leakage on effort, exertion, sneezing, or coughing [8]. SUI is a symptom mainly caused by sphincteric incompetence and usually occurs in women after delivery or pelvic surgery, whereas most cases of male UI occur after prostatectomy. UI after radical prostatectomy is related to intrinsic sphincter deficiency in most patients [9], [10], [11], [12], although detrusor overactivity or compliance abnormalities may also exist [13]. One of the largest studies that evaluated incontinent patients after prostatectomy was published in 2005 and included a total of 146 patients [14]. After video-urodynamic investigation, 139 men (95%) were classified as having SUI and had leakage of contrast media through the bladder neck and urethra during the Valsalva manoeuvre or coughing. Of these patients, 24 (17%) also had detrusor overactivity defined as involuntary detrusor contractions with amplitude of > 15 cm H2O, and 11 patients (8%) had reduced bladder compliance (compliance < 12.5 ml/cm H2O).

In general, sphincter deficiency might be caused by damage of smooth muscle cells of the bladder neck or proximal urethra, striated muscle cells of the urethral sphincter, or nerves innervating these anatomic structures. To identify possible drugs that could have a therapeutic effect on male SUI, it is crucial to understand the mechanisms maintaining continence. The urinary continence mechanism is complex, involving the integration of the central and peripheral nervous systems as well as skeletal and smooth muscles. The storage phase of the micturition cycle requires relaxation of the detrusor to allow accommodation of increasing urine volumes at low vesical pressure in conjunction with increased bladder outlet resistance, that is, enhanced tone of the bladder neck, urethra, and pelvic floor [15]. Detrusor relaxation is mainly mediated by β3-adrenoceptor stimulation via noradrenaline release in the hypogastricus nerve. Increased bladder outlet resistance is provided by (1) smooth muscle cell contraction in the bladder neck and proximal urethra mediated by noradrenaline and α1-adrenoceptor stimulation and (2) striated muscle cell contraction in the external sphincter and pelvic floor mediated by acetylcholine and nicotine receptor stimulation. The rhabdomyosphincter activity is controlled by the Onuf nucleus in the sacral spinal cord and neurons releasing serotonin and noradrenaline modulate this activity.

Surgical procedures have been the standard treatment of SUI for decades and implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter has been the standard treatment for male SUI after prostatectomy SUI [16]. Recently, duloxetine was introduced for the treatment of female SUI [17]. Drug treatment for SUI aims to increase outflow resistance. Because SUI is a symptom that is commonly considered to occur mainly in women, studies investigating the effects of pharmacotherapy in men are sparse. Additionally, anatomic differences of the lower urinary tract between men and women are believed to be responsible for the different underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of SUI. Even though drugs act on the same structures of the lower urinary tract in both men and women, gender differences might be relevant. Therefore, treatment data from female populations cannot simply be extrapolated to men. This systematic literature review aims to clarify the drug classes suitable for treatment of male SUI, summarise the results of the individual drug trials, and judge the level of evidence of the available studies.

Section snippets

Methods

A Medline search was conducted for articles published between 1966 and June 2007 using the MeSH terms “drug therapy” and “stress urinary incontinence.” In addition, a PubMed and ISI of Knowledge Web of Science database literature search was performed with the search terms “medical treatment,” “pharmacotherapy,” and “post-prostatectomy incontinence.” The reference list of the retrieved articles was additionally studied to identify any articles published before 1966. Articles were also identified

Results

The literature search revealed studies with potentially beneficial effects for symptoms of male SUI using α-adrenoceptor agonists, β2-adrenoceptor agonists, or serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. Nine trials were identified using drugs of these three distinct classes and the trials of these drugs formed the basis of this article (Table 1). Only one of these studies included a comparison arm. Studies without a comparison arm make the judgement of placebo effects on and spontaneous

Conclusions

Even though medical treatment of SUI has been investigated mainly in women, some studies do exist for male SUI, especially in patients after radical prostatectomy. Most of these studies do not have the most appropriate design for evaluating the effects of treatment and have a low evidence level (level 4 according to the Oxford classification). The newer drug duloxetine with proven efficacy in female SUI seems to be effective in male SUI as well. Although studies with this compound are limited,

Conflicts of interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

References (43)

  • M.E. Brune et al.

    Comparison of alpha 1-adrenoreceptor agonists in canine urethral pressure profilometry and abdominal leak point pressure models

    J Urol

    (2001)
  • O. Ishiko et al.

    Beta(2)-adrenergic agonists and pelvic floor exercises for female stress incontinence

    Int J Gynaecol Obstet

    (2000)
  • S. Boy et al.

    Facilitatory neuromodulative effect of duloxetine on pudendal motor neurons controlling the urethral pressure: a functional urodynamic study in healthy women

    Eur Urol

    (2006)
  • P. Mariappan et al.

    Duloxetine, a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review

    Eur Urol

    (2007)
  • D.E. Stewart et al.

    Duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder: comparisons of safety and tolerability in male and female patients

    J Affect Disord

    (2006)
  • S. Hunskaar et al.

    One hundred and fifty men with urinary incontinence. III. Psychosocial consequences

    Scand J Prim Health Care

    (1993)
  • C. Shaw

    A review of the psychosocial predictors of help-seeking behaviour and impact on quality of life in people with urinary incontinence

    J Clin Nurs

    (2001)
  • A.R. Herzog et al.

    Urinary incontinence and psychological distress among older adults

    Psychol Aging

    (1988)
  • S. Hunskaar et al.

    Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence

  • D. Thom

    Variation in estimate of UI prevalence in the community: effects of different in definition, population characteristics and study type

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1998)
  • K.M. Langa et al.

    Informal care giving time and costs for urinary incontinence in older individuals in the United States

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2002)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Use of Duloxetine for Postprostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review

      2021, European Urology Focus
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is the first SR to include all studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of duloxetine in men with PPSUI. A previous review of pharmacological treatments for male SUI included only three studies regarding duloxetine up until 2007 and reported findings consistent with the present review [26]. Importantly, however, the methodology in the previous review differs significantly from the present SR.

    • A cocktail of growth factors released from a heparin hyaluronic-acid hydrogel promotes the myogenic potential of human urine-derived stem cells in vivo

      2020, Acta Biomaterialia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Approximately 13 million Americans and 200 million people worldwide suffer from urinary incontinence [3]. Current therapeutic approaches include pharmacotherapy, sling surgery, and injection of bulking agents [4–10]. Despite the success of these therapies, each approach fails over time because they do not address the underlying cause of neuromuscular damage.

    • Postradical Prostatectomy Incontinence

      2016, Prostate Cancer: Science and Clinical Practice: Second Edition
    • Inhibiting neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor modulates melanocortin receptor- and NF-κB-mediated feeding behavior in phenylpropanolamine-treated rats

      2013, Hormones and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      The mechanism underlying appetite suppression by PPA is related to the release of catecholamine, which exerts its inhibitory effects on NPY-containing neurons (Cheng and Kuo, 2003; Hsieh et al., 2007b; Wellman and Davies, 1992). PPA has been clinically prohibited in the USA due to the risks of myocardial injury and hemorrhagic stroke (Pilsczek et al., 2003), but PPA has an anti-addictive effect (Penzner et al., 2008) and can be used clinically to improve male stress urinary incontinence (Tsakiris et al., 2008) and to prevent weight gain after smoking cessation in patients (Parsons et al., 2009). Therefore, the complex and indeterminate effects of PPA in the brain require additional investigation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text