Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 55, Issue 4, April 2009, Pages 773-780
European Urology

Platinum Priority – Bladder Cancer
Editorial by Harry W. Herr on pp. 781–782 of this issue
Should All Patients with Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Receive Early Intravesical Chemotherapy after Transurethral Resection? The Results of a Prospective Randomised Multicentre Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

To decrease recurrences in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines recommend immediate, intravesical chemotherapy after transurethral resection (TUR) for all patients with Ta/T1 tumours.

Objective

To study the benefits of a single, early, intravesical instillation of epirubicin after TUR in patients with low- to intermediate-risk NMIBC.

Design, setting, and participants

In this prospective randomised multicentre trial, 305 patients with primary as well as recurrent low- to intermediate-risk (Ta/T1, G1/G2) tumours were enrolled between 1997 and 2004. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 80 mg of epirubicin in 50 ml of saline intravesically within 24 h of TUR or no further treatment after TUR.

Measurements

The primary end point was time to first recurrence.

Results and limitations

A total of 219 patients remained for analysis after exclusions. The median follow-up time was 3.9 yr. During the study period, 62% (63 of 102) of the patients in the epirubicin group and 77% (90 of 117) in the control group experienced recurrence (p = 0.016). In a multivariate model, the hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence was 0.56 (p = 0.002) for early instillation of epirubicin versus no treatment. In a subgroup analysis, the treatment had a profound recurrence-reducing effect on patients with primary, solitary tumours, whereas it provided no benefits in patients with recurrent or multiple tumours. Furthermore, patients with a modified European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk score of 0–2 with and without single instillation had recurrence rates of 41% and 69%, respectively (p = 0.003), whereas the corresponding rates for those with a risk score of ≥3 were 81% and 85%, respectively (p = 0.35).

Conclusions

A single, early instillation of epirubicin after TUR for NMIBC reduces the likelihood of tumour recurrence; however, the benefit seems to be minimal in patients at intermediate or high risk of recurrence. Future trials will determine the value of early instillation in addition to serial instillations in NMIBC.

Introduction

The majority of patients diagnosed with non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) will have one or more recurrences after transurethral resection (TUR). Prior recurrences, prior recurrence rate, and tumour multiplicity are the strongest risk factors for recurrent disease, although the stage, grade, and size of tumours are also of importance. The estimated risk of recurrence and progression can be calculated for the individual patient by using the risk score introduced by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [1]. According to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines [2], to decrease the risk of recurrences, “one, post-operative instillation of chemotherapy should be given in all patients after TUR of presumably non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer.” This recommendation is based on several randomised trials [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] as well as a meta-analysis [13] indicating that one out of 8.5 treated patients can be spared a subsequent recurrence by use of the mentioned approach. Epirubicin (4′epidoxorubicin) is a chemotherapeutic drug that has a favourable tolerability profile and has been shown to prevent recurrences in patients with low- and intermediate-risk NMIBC [4], [8], [9], [14]. Our aim was to conduct a randomised, multicentre trial to study the benefits of a single, early, intravesical instillation of epirubicin after TUR in all patients with such disease.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Between 1997 and 2004, 305 patients with cystoscopy-verified bladder tumours who were scheduled for TUR were included in the study. Patients with primary or recurrent low- to intermediate-risk (Ta/T1, G1/G2) tumours were enrolled. Single as well as multiple tumours were included, and there was no upper limit on tumour size. Patients with carcinoma in situ (CIS), grade 3 cancers, or muscle-invasive tumours on histopathologic examination were excluded. A history of high-risk bladder tumours (G3

Results

Eighty-six (28%) of the 305 randomised patients were excluded (Fig. 2) for the reasons given in Table 2. Of the 219 patients eligible for the final analysis, 115 (53%) had primary tumours and 104 (47%) recurrent tumours. At inclusion, 46% had solitary tumours, 25% had two or three tumours, and 30% had four or more tumours. Other patient characteristics are outlined in Table 3. The median follow-up time was 3.6 yr (range: 0.4–7.4 yr) for patients without recurrence and 3.9 yr for all patients.

Discussion

The unacceptably high recurrence rate after TUR has driven the search for supplementary treatments for NMIBC. A recurrence can be the result of either a true reappearance of a previously resected tumour or the development of a new primary tumour from genetically unstable urothelium [15]. Unfortunately, in clinical practice, it is impossible to distinguish between the two types of recurrence. True recurrence is probably most often the result of incomplete TUR, although animal studies have shown

Conclusions

Single, early instillation of epirubicin after TUR for NMIBC prevents tumour recurrences, mainly in cases of primary, solitary tumours—that is, in patients at low risk of recurrence. By comparison, we found that such post-TUR treatment was not beneficial in patients at intermediate or high risk of recurrence. In our view, there are insufficient data supporting the general recommendation of the EAU that all patients with NMIBC should be treated with early instillation. Future prospective

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (138)

  • Partial cystectomy: Review of a single center experience from 2004 to 2019

    2022, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
  • The effect of tumor grade heterogeneity on recurrence in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

    2022, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
  • Current Therapy and Emerging Intravesical Agents to Treat Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

    2021, Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    For those at low risk of recurrence, single postoperative intravesical therapy is likely satisfactory. Single instillation of epirubicin after transurethral resection has also been shown in a randomized trial by Gudjonsson and colleagues8 to reduce the likelihood of tumor recurrence, primarily in patients with small, low-risk tumors; however, this agent is not currently available in the United States. In addition to the standard adjuvant intravesical therapy, mitomycin C is also being explored as a chemoablative agent in a phase IV trial (NCT03348969) and results are forthcoming.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Please visit www.eu-acme.org/europeanurology to read and answer questions on-line. The EU-ACME credits will then be attributed automatically.

View full text