Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 58, Issue 2, August 2010, Pages 270-274
European Urology

Surgery in Motion
Laparoscopic Surgical Complete Sling Resection for Tension-Free Vaginal Tape–Related Complications Refractory to First-Line Conservative Management: A Single-Centre Experience

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.025Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) has been largely used for the management of stress urinary incontinence. In certain cases, however, this procedure results in bothersome complications that lead to a complete resection.

Objective

We assessed the technical feasibility and functional outcome after complete laparoscopic resection of TVT.

Design, setting, and participants

Thirty-eight women with TVT-related complications refractory to first-line management underwent a complete laparoscopic tape resection between 2001 and 2009.

Surgical procedure

Complete laparoscopic resection was achieved with either an intra- or extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach. Laparoscopy was performed with four ports: a 10-mm umbilical telescope port, two 5-mm ports placed medially to the anterior superior iliac spines, and a 10-mm port placed at the midpoint between the pubis and umbilicus. The two half-tapes were dissected towards the urethra and removed.

Measurements

All data referring to patient demographics, surgery, tape-related complication, and perioperative outcomes were recorded.

Results and limitations

The mean age of the patients was 66.2 yr (range: 45–79 yr). TVT-related complications included bladder erosion, vaginal extrusion, and bladder outlet obstruction or groin pain. The resection took place at a mean time of 25 mo (range: 6–80 mo) after TVT placement. Resection was complete in all patients, within a mean operative time of 110 min (range: 50–240 min). All women reported a total decrease of symptom-related complications within a mean follow-up period of 37.9 mo (range: 2–80 mo). However, recurrent incontinence occurred in 65.7% (n = 25) of the patients. The main limitation of the study was the lack of a validated questionnaire to assess the evolution of functional disorders.

Conclusions

Complete laparoscopic resection of TVT is safe and technically feasible. In the limited number of women who have persisting disabling symptoms after conservative management, urologists must be aware that a complete resection can help resolve the symptoms.

Introduction

Midurethral sling (MUS) procedures are now considered the gold standard for surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Owing to its technical feasibility and long-term success rate, tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) was the first procedure to revolutionise and challenge the management of SUI [1], [2], [3]. TVT was extensively performed until the emergence of the transobturator approach and the third generation of TVT (TVT-SECUR, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA), which led to a decrease in TVT use by urologists and gynaecologists [4], [5], [6], [7].

Thus, >1 million TVT slings have been placed worldwide since its first description in 1996 [8]. TVT has always been considered to be a safe and minimally invasive anti-incontinence procedure [9]. However, a growing number of postoperative complications and unexpected surgical injuries associated with the retropubic route have been reported in recent literature [10], [11], [12]. These complications include perioperative and postoperative complications such as bladder injury, mesh erosion, chronic pain, or infection.

Among these complications, some are refractory to first-line conservative management and require a more radical surgical treatment. Indeed, surgical teams have already reported their management of MUS complications, but these experiences are still scarce in the current literature [13], [14]. To date, only two studies have demonstrated that resection of a MUS is safe and technically feasible using a laparoscopic approach and that it helps to manage tape-related complications in specific cases [12], [15]. In the current study, we report our specific clinical experience of TVT-related complications that required complete laparoscopic resection.

Section snippets

Population

All women who were sent to our academic urology department for TVT-related complications between January 2001 and December 2009 were retrospectively considered for inclusion in the study. The following data were extracted from their charts: age, body mass index (BMI), initial type of incontinence, past medical history of previous pelvic support and anti-incontinence procedures, date of the suburethral tape resection procedure, complications, length of bladder catheterisation and of hospital

Results

Overall, 38 women with a mean age of 66.2 ± 10 yr (range: 45–79 yr) at the time of resection were included in the analysis. The median BMI was 25.5 kg/m2 (range: 22–32 kg/m2). All TVTs had been implanted at another centre, and the patients were referred to our centre for management of tape-related complications.

Discussion

Over the last two decades, TVT surgery had become the most common treatment for female SUI until the emergence of the transobturator tape and third-generation TVT [17]. Most teams that manage urinary incontinence in female patients have communicated data on the best treatment options, but very few have reported the complications of these treatments. However, widespread use of the retropubic route has resulted in an increasing number of reported complications, ranging from 4.3% to 75.1% in a

Conclusions

TVT is still considered the primary surgical choice for female SUI. Although TVT offers an effective SUI treatment, it has significant associations with postoperative complications, leading (in specific cases) to a radical surgical management after the failure of first-line treatment. Complete laparoscopic resection of TVT is safe and technically feasible and can help resolve bothersome symptoms. However, women should be warned of the risk of recurrent incontinence.

References (27)

Cited by (38)

  • Symptom Resolution and Recurrent Urinary Incontinence Following Removal of Painful Midurethral Slings

    2022, Urology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Here we report a large case series of painful synthetic slings focusing on the treatment outcomes of partial and complete sling removal with regard to pain resolution, postoperative urinary incontinence, and the need for additional reconstructive procedures. In our series, 78.1% of patients experienced pain resolution or improvement after sling removal, consistent with other studies.10-13 However, few prior studies have categorized sling removal into complete vs partial removal, and few have categorized pain into resolution vs improvement.

  • Managing pain after synthetic mesh implants in pelvic surgery

    2019, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In these patient’s excision of the mesh may not alter the clinical course as the response appears to be more systemic. This is an area where further research is urgently needed to guide appropriate management of these women as there is a lack of evidence or data relating to this group, although there are small case series suggesting solutions [21]. Data on the outcome of surgery to remove the mesh/tape is beginning to emerge [22,23], but at present patients should be warned that surgery may not resolve their symptoms.

  • Retrospective study on the management and follow-up of 18 patients with a mid-urethral sling penetrating the urethra or bladder

    2018, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
    Citation Excerpt :

    In our series, laparoscopy was only used twice (successfully) to treat complications arising from the cystoscopy approach. The laparoscopy approach for bladder-penetrating MUSs has been widely described for excision of bladder sling exposure after a retro-pubic MUS [43,56]. Roslan and Markuszewski [32] published an interesting series in 2013, using an exclusive trans-vesical suprapubic approach with a single trocar and insufflation of the bladder with carbon dioxide.

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

The first two authors contributed equally to this paper.

View full text