Surgery in MotionLaparoscopic Surgical Complete Sling Resection for Tension-Free Vaginal Tape–Related Complications Refractory to First-Line Conservative Management: A Single-Centre Experience
Introduction
Midurethral sling (MUS) procedures are now considered the gold standard for surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Owing to its technical feasibility and long-term success rate, tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) was the first procedure to revolutionise and challenge the management of SUI [1], [2], [3]. TVT was extensively performed until the emergence of the transobturator approach and the third generation of TVT (TVT-SECUR, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA), which led to a decrease in TVT use by urologists and gynaecologists [4], [5], [6], [7].
Thus, >1 million TVT slings have been placed worldwide since its first description in 1996 [8]. TVT has always been considered to be a safe and minimally invasive anti-incontinence procedure [9]. However, a growing number of postoperative complications and unexpected surgical injuries associated with the retropubic route have been reported in recent literature [10], [11], [12]. These complications include perioperative and postoperative complications such as bladder injury, mesh erosion, chronic pain, or infection.
Among these complications, some are refractory to first-line conservative management and require a more radical surgical treatment. Indeed, surgical teams have already reported their management of MUS complications, but these experiences are still scarce in the current literature [13], [14]. To date, only two studies have demonstrated that resection of a MUS is safe and technically feasible using a laparoscopic approach and that it helps to manage tape-related complications in specific cases [12], [15]. In the current study, we report our specific clinical experience of TVT-related complications that required complete laparoscopic resection.
Section snippets
Population
All women who were sent to our academic urology department for TVT-related complications between January 2001 and December 2009 were retrospectively considered for inclusion in the study. The following data were extracted from their charts: age, body mass index (BMI), initial type of incontinence, past medical history of previous pelvic support and anti-incontinence procedures, date of the suburethral tape resection procedure, complications, length of bladder catheterisation and of hospital
Results
Overall, 38 women with a mean age of 66.2 ± 10 yr (range: 45–79 yr) at the time of resection were included in the analysis. The median BMI was 25.5 kg/m2 (range: 22–32 kg/m2). All TVTs had been implanted at another centre, and the patients were referred to our centre for management of tape-related complications.
Discussion
Over the last two decades, TVT surgery had become the most common treatment for female SUI until the emergence of the transobturator tape and third-generation TVT [17]. Most teams that manage urinary incontinence in female patients have communicated data on the best treatment options, but very few have reported the complications of these treatments. However, widespread use of the retropubic route has resulted in an increasing number of reported complications, ranging from 4.3% to 75.1% in a
Conclusions
TVT is still considered the primary surgical choice for female SUI. Although TVT offers an effective SUI treatment, it has significant associations with postoperative complications, leading (in specific cases) to a radical surgical management after the failure of first-line treatment. Complete laparoscopic resection of TVT is safe and technically feasible and can help resolve bothersome symptoms. However, women should be warned of the risk of recurrent incontinence.
References (27)
- et al.
Five-year outcomes of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence
Eur Urol
(2006) - et al.
Tension-free midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of effectiveness
Eur Urol
(2007) - et al.
Tension-free vaginal tape procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: long-term results
J Urol
(2004) - et al.
Transobturator tape (Uratape®): a new minimally-invasive procedure to treat female urinary incontinence
Eur Urol
(2004) - et al.
Comparison of retropubic and outside-in transoburator sling systems for the cure of female genuine stress urinary incontinence
Eur Urol
(2005) - et al.
Polypropylene mesh tape for stress urinary incontinence: complications of urethral erosion and outlet obstruction
J Urol
(2002) - et al.
Third-generation tension-free tape for female stress urinary incontinence
J Urol
(2009) - et al.
Complications of mid urethral slings: important outcomes for future clinical trials
J Urol
(2008) - et al.
Surgical resection for suburethral sling complications after treatment for stress urinary incontinence
J Urol
(2009) - et al.
Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4)
Pain
(2005)
A prospective multicenter randomized comparative study between the U- and H-type methods of the TVT SECUR procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up
Eur Urol
Erosions and urinary retention following polypropylene synthetic sling: Australasian survey
Eur Urol
Urinary tract erosions after synthetic pubovaginal slings: diagnosis and management strategy
Urology
Cited by (38)
Surgical complications in adult urology: Pelvic and perineal surgery
2022, Progres en UrologieSymptom Resolution and Recurrent Urinary Incontinence Following Removal of Painful Midurethral Slings
2022, UrologyCitation Excerpt :Here we report a large case series of painful synthetic slings focusing on the treatment outcomes of partial and complete sling removal with regard to pain resolution, postoperative urinary incontinence, and the need for additional reconstructive procedures. In our series, 78.1% of patients experienced pain resolution or improvement after sling removal, consistent with other studies.10-13 However, few prior studies have categorized sling removal into complete vs partial removal, and few have categorized pain into resolution vs improvement.
Managing pain after synthetic mesh implants in pelvic surgery
2019, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyCitation Excerpt :In these patient’s excision of the mesh may not alter the clinical course as the response appears to be more systemic. This is an area where further research is urgently needed to guide appropriate management of these women as there is a lack of evidence or data relating to this group, although there are small case series suggesting solutions [21]. Data on the outcome of surgery to remove the mesh/tape is beginning to emerge [22,23], but at present patients should be warned that surgery may not resolve their symptoms.
Retrospective study on the management and follow-up of 18 patients with a mid-urethral sling penetrating the urethra or bladder
2018, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human ReproductionCitation Excerpt :In our series, laparoscopy was only used twice (successfully) to treat complications arising from the cystoscopy approach. The laparoscopy approach for bladder-penetrating MUSs has been widely described for excision of bladder sling exposure after a retro-pubic MUS [43,56]. Roslan and Markuszewski [32] published an interesting series in 2013, using an exclusive trans-vesical suprapubic approach with a single trocar and insufflation of the bladder with carbon dioxide.
How to Deal with Pain Following a Vaginal Mesh Insertion
2016, European Urology Focus
- 1
The first two authors contributed equally to this paper.