Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 67, Issue 1, January 2015, Pages 23-29
European Urology

Platinum Priority – Prostate Cancer
Editorial by Anna Orsola and Joaquim Bellmunt on pp. 30–32 of this issue
Efficacy of Enzalutamide Following Abiraterone Acetate in Chemotherapy-naive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.045Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The activity of enzalutamide after prior treatment with both abiraterone acetate (abiraterone) and docetaxel has been examined in several retrospective studies. However, limited data are available on the efficacy of enzalutamide following abiraterone in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Objective

To compare the activity of enzalutamide after abiraterone in docetaxel-experienced and docetaxel-naive mCRPC patients.

Design, setting, and participants

The British Columbia Cancer Agency Cancer Registry was searched for mCRPC patients who received enzalutamide after prior abiraterone. Clinicopathologic characteristics, confirmed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rates (PSA decline ≥50% confirmed ≥3 wk later), and survival data were collected.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Outcomes on enzalutamide were compared between docetaxel-experienced and docetaxel-naive patients using chi-square for PSA response and log-rank test for time to PSA progression and overall survival (OS). Univariate analysis was performed to identify variables associated with confirmed PSA response on enzalutamide, using either chi-square for categorical variables or logistic regression for continuous variables.

Results and limitations

A total of 115 patients received enzalutamide after abiraterone: 68 had received prior docetaxel and 47 were docetaxel naive. Median time on enzalutamide was 4.1 mo. Confirmed PSA response rates (22% vs 26%; p = 0.8), median time to radiologic/clinical progression (4.6 mo vs 6.6 mo; p = 0.6), and median OS (10.6 mo vs 8.6 mo; p = 0.2) did not differ significantly between docetaxel-experienced and docetaxel-naive patients. No clinical variables (including prior response to abiraterone) were found to associate significantly with confirmed PSA response to enzalutamide.

Conclusions

Antitumour activity of enzalutamide following abiraterone was limited in mCRPC patients irrespective of prior docetaxel use. Identifying clinical and molecular factors predictive of response to enzalutamide remains a high priority for future research.

Patient summary

We looked at the effectiveness of enzalutamide after abiraterone acetate for treatment of advanced prostate cancer. We found that patients who had received docetaxel chemotherapy before abiraterone gained similar benefit from enzalutamide compared with patients who had not received docetaxel. These results suggest that earlier treatment with docetaxel does not have a large impact on the activity of enzalutamide after abiraterone.

Introduction

The therapeutic armamentarium for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has rapidly expanded in recent years with several novel agents demonstrating a benefit on overall survival (OS) [1]. Among these agents are the novel androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies abiraterone acetate (abiraterone) and enzalutamide that inhibit CYP17 and AR, respectively. Both abiraterone and enzalutamide are increasingly being used in chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients on the basis of positive data from the COU-AA-302 (abiraterone) and PREVAIL (enzalutamide) phase 3 studies [2], [3]. Despite their efficacy, however, many questions regarding the use of abiraterone and enzalutamide remain unanswered including the optimal sequencing of treatment. Several prior studies have reported on outcomes in mCRPC patients treated with enzalutamide after abiraterone [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. All but one of these studies [9] were restricted to patients previously treated with docetaxel, and currently little is known about the activity of enzalutamide following abiraterone in docetaxel-naive mCRPC patients. The aim of this study was to examine the activity of enzalutamide after abiraterone in mCRPC patients not previously treated with docetaxel chemotherapy and to compare outcomes with docetaxel-experienced patients.

Section snippets

Patient population

The British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) consists of six distinct centres located throughout British Columbia, Canada. The Cancer Registry at BCCA was reviewed for mCRPC patients treated with enzalutamide following abiraterone. Patient demographics, prior treatments including docetaxel and abiraterone, clinicopathologic characteristics, and outcomes on postabiraterone enzalutamide (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] response and survival parameters) were documented from medical records of each

Patient population

A total of 115 patients were treated with enzalutamide following abiraterone: 68 had received at least one cycle of docetaxel previously (“docetaxel experienced”); the remaining 47 patients were docetaxel naive. Table 1 lists the patient characteristics at the initiation of enzalutamide. Docetaxel-experienced and docetaxel-naive patients were matched for all clinicopathologic characteristics with the exception of age and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH).

Enzalutamide treatment

Median duration of enzalutamide

Discussion

In this retrospective study, we examined the antitumour activity of enzalutamide after abiraterone in mCRPC patients. We found that the efficacy of enzalutamide was comparable in docetaxel-experienced and docetaxel-naive patients in terms of confirmed PSA response rates (22% vs 26%; p = 0.8), median time to radiologic/clinical progression (4.6 mo vs 6.6 mo; p = 0.6), and median OS (10.6 mo vs 8.6 mo; p = 0.2). These findings are somewhat surprising because we had anticipated that enzalutamide would

Conclusions

We found that the antitumour efficacy of enzalutamide following abiraterone is similar in docetaxel-experienced and docetaxel-naive mCRPC patients. Our data suggest that therapeutic resistance to enzalutamide is not linked to prior treatment with docetaxel. Notably, enzalutamide had limited overall activity after abiraterone with or without prior docetaxel. This illustrates the importance of conducting clinical trials examining novel therapeutic approaches in patients progressing on

References (30)

  • T.M. Beer et al.

    Enzalutamide in men with chemotherapy-naive metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC): results of phase III PREVAIL study [abstract LBA1^]

    J Clin Oncol

    (2014)
  • C.J. Ryan et al.

    Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy

    N Engl J Med

    (2013)
  • F.B. Thomsen et al.

    Enzalutamide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after chemotherapy and abiraterone acetate

    Scand J Urol

    (2014)
  • S.C. Schmid et al.

    Enzalutamide after docetaxel and abiraterone therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

    Adv Ther

    (2014)
  • S. Badrising et al.

    Clinical activity and tolerability of enzalutamide (MDV3100) in patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer who progress after docetaxel and abiraterone treatment

    Cancer

    (2014)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text