RARC Pasadena Consensus Panel – EditorialReferring to the articles published on pp. 363–431 of this issueRobotic Radical Cystectomy: So Far, So Good—What Next?
Section snippets
Conflicts of interest
The authors have nothing to disclose.
References (18)
- et al.
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy
Eur Urol
(2015) - et al.
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy
Eur Urol
(2015) - et al.
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: technical recommendations from the Pasadena Consensus Panel
Eur Urol
(2015) - et al.
Best practices in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary reconstruction: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel
Eur Urol
(2015) - et al.
Robotic and laparoscopic high extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy: technique and outcomes
Eur Urol
(2012) - et al.
Robotic intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder: replicating open surgical principles
Eur Urol
(2012) - et al.
Robotic intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder during radical cystectomy in 132 patients
J Urol
(2014) - et al.
Laparoscopic radical cystectomy and continent orthotopic ileal neobladder performed completely intracorporeally – the initial experience
J Urol
(2002) - et al.
Perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy
J Urol
(2013)
Cited by (8)
Perioperative and mid-term oncologic outcomes of robotic assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal neobladder: Results of a propensity score matched comparison with open cohort from a single-centre series
2018, European Journal of Surgical OncologyCitation Excerpt :Additionally, the majority of published series capture institutions early in their learning curves and incorporate patients potentially selected for the robotic approach, thus avoiding more advanced-stage or technically difficult cases. Finally, most series failed to provide specific information concerning technical challenges of the reconstructive steps, especially when intracorporeal orthotopic UD is performed [6]. To date, only few prospective randomized trials have compared the outcomes of ORC vs RARC [7–9].
Robotic Intracorporeal Orthotopic Neobladder: Urodynamic Outcomes, Urinary Function, and Health-related Quality of Life
2016, European UrologyCitation Excerpt :Nevertheless, the entirely robotic procedure must be assessed in a randomized controlled setting to evaluate costs, perioperative morbidity, and functional, HRQOL, and oncologic outcomes. We believe that our study represents an important step forward in the continuing assessment of iONB efficacy via multiple metrics [29]. Our UDS data confirm that robotic iONB creation recapitulates the necessary characteristics of a high-volume, low-pressure reservoir.
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) following radical cystectomy: is it worth implementing for all patients?
2020, World Journal of UrologyRobotic intracorporeal urinary diversion: State of the art
2019, Current Opinion in UrologySurgical and pathological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the community setting
2018, Journal of Robotic Surgery