Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 69, Issue 4, April 2016, Pages 693-703
European Urology

Collaborative Review – Prostatic Disease
Exercise for Men with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.047Get rights and content

Abstract

Context

Exercise could be beneficial for prostate cancer survivors. However, no systematic review across cancer stages and treatment types addressing potential benefits and harms exists to date.

Objective

To assess the effects of exercise on cancer-specific quality of life and adverse events in prostate cancer trials.

Evidence acquisition

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, and PEDro. We also searched grey literature databases, including trial registers. Searches were from database inception to March 2015. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for meta-analysis.

Evidence synthesis

We included 16 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1574 men with prostate cancer. Follow-up varied from 8 wk to 12 mo. RCTs involved men with stage I–IV cancers. A high risk of bias was frequently due to problematic intervention adherence. Seven trials involving 912 men measured cancer-specific quality of life. Pooling of the data from these seven trials revealed no significant effect on this outcome (SMD 0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] –0.08 to 0.34, median follow-up 12 wk). Sensitivity analysis of studies that were judged to be of high quality indicated a moderate positive effect estimate (SMD 0.33, 95% CI 0.08–0.58; median follow-up 12 wk). Similar beneficial effects were seen for cancer-specific fatigue, submaximal fitness, and lower body strength. We found no evidence of benefit for disease progression, cardiovascular health, or sexual function. There were no deaths attributable to exercise interventions. Other serious adverse events (eg, myocardial infarction) were equivalent to those seen in controls.

Conclusions

These results support the hypothesis that exercise interventions improve cancer-specific quality of life, cancer-specific fatigue, submaximal fitness, and lower body strength.

Patient summary

This review shows that exercise/physical activity interventions can improve quality of life, fatigue, fitness, and function for men with prostate cancer.

Introduction

Prostate cancer is the primary cause of years lived with cancer disability in the Americas, Northwest Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and much of sub-Saharan Africa [1]. Management of prostate cancer ranges from no intervention (active surveillance or watchful waiting) to radical local treatment (prostatectomy and radiation therapy) with or without combined androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), ADT alone, to taxane-based chemotherapy for progressive castration-resistant disease [2] and second-line hormone agents [3], [4]. First-line radical treatment for prostate cancer can negatively impact quality of life (eg, erectile dysfunction, incontinence, radiation proctitis), as can ADT (eg, loss of muscle mass, fatigue, psychological morbidity, higher risk of cardiovascular disease and bone fracture) [5], [6]. Direct symptoms for advanced or metastatic cancer (eg, pain, hypercalcaemia, spinal cord compression, pathological fractures) can also adversely affect health [7], [8].

Several recent systematic reviews have examined the effects of exercise in cancer survivors in terms of quality of life [9], [10], exercise behaviour [11], and fatigue [12]. These reviews cover an amalgamation of heterogeneous primary cancers. Most evidence comes from trials in breast cancer and thus cannot be generalised to men with prostate cancer. Furthermore, exercise therapy appears to be beneficial in the short term, but little is known about dose, duration, and longer-term effects of such therapy, including adverse effects over extended follow-up. Finally, despite the potential health benefits for men with prostate cancer, few clinicians are aware of the role of exercise, and in many cases it goes unprescribed. The aim of this review was primarily to evaluate the effect of exercise interventions on cancer-specific quality of life after prostate cancer diagnosis and to assess adverse effects.

Section snippets

Evidence acquisition

Methods for this systematic review have been described in detail elsewhere [13]. In brief, the primary review outcomes were quality of life and adverse events. Secondary outcomes include effects on fatigue, disease progression, cardiovascular health, physical fitness and function, and sexual function.

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, and PEDro databases from inception to March 31, 2015. We expanded the database

Search results

Figure 1 shows the results for the literature searches and screening process for the review. We identified 4356 unique records from database searches and 22 manuscripts through grey literature and hand checking of references for studies included and related systematic reviews [16], [17]. After reviewing by title and abstract, we evaluated the full text for 91 records, after which 67 studies were excluded from the review. All full-text manuscripts were available in English. We sent 31 emails

Conclusions

There is level 1 evidence that exercise interventions are efficacious in improving cancer-specific quality of life, fatigue, and exercise capacity in men with prostate cancer. The high-quality evidence comes mainly from men with advanced disease on ADT. Adverse events such as minor soft-tissue injuries (sprains and strains) can be expected in a minority of men but can also be mitigated by properly tailored exercise prescription and progression around individual capabilities and existing

References (43)

  • D.A. Galvão et al.

    Acute versus chronic exposure to androgen suppression for prostate cancer: impact on the exercise response

    J Urol

    (2011)
  • K.S. Courneya et al.

    Three independent factors predicted adherence in a randomized controlled trial of resistance exercise training among prostate cancer survivors

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (2004)
  • K.M. Winters-Stone et al.

    Resistance training reduces disability in prostate cancer survivors on androgen deprivation therapy: evidence from a randomized controlled trial

    Arch Phys Med Rehab

    (2015)
  • J.S. de Bono et al.

    Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2011)
  • H.I. Scher et al.

    Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy

    N Engl J Med

    (2012)
  • B.I. Carlin et al.

    The natural history, skeletal complications, and management of bone metastases in patients with prostate carcinoma

    Cancer

    (2000)
  • S.I. Mishra et al.

    Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for cancer survivors

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2012)
  • S.I. Mishra et al.

    Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for people with cancer during active treatment

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev.

    (2012)
  • L. Bourke et al.

    Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2013)
  • F. Cramp et al.

    Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2012)
  • L. Bourke et al.

    Exercise interventions for men with prostate cancer

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2014)
  • Cited by (203)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text