Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 74, Issue 2, August 2018, Pages 146-154
European Urology

Platinum Priority – Prostate Cancer
Editorial by Jeffrey J. Tosoian and Tamara L. Lotan on pp. 155–156 of this issue
Clinical and Genomic Characterization of Low–Prostate-specific Antigen, High-grade Prostate Cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.043Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The consequences of low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in high-grade (Gleason 8–10) prostate cancer are unknown.

Objective

To evaluate the clinical implications and genomic features of low-PSA, high-grade disease.

Design, setting, and participants

This was a retrospective study of clinical data for 494 793 patients from the National Cancer Data Base and 136 113 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program with cT1–4N0M0 prostate cancer (median follow-up 48.9 and 25.0 mo, respectively), and genomic data for 4960 patients from the Decipher Genomic Resource Information Database. Data were collected for 2004–2017.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Multivariable Fine-Gray and Cox regressions were used to analyze prostate cancer–specific mortality (PCSM) and all-cause mortality, respectively.

Results and limitations

For Gleason 8–10 disease, using PSA 4.1–10.0 ng/ml (n = 38 719) as referent, the distribution of PCSM by PSA was U-shaped, with an adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) of 2.70 for PSA ≤2.5 ng/ml (n = 3862, p < 0.001) versus 1.97, 1.36, and 2.56 for PSA of 2.6–4.0 (n = 4199), 10.1–20.0 (n = 17 372), and >20.0 ng/ml (n = 16 114), respectively. By contrast, the distribution of PCSM by PSA was linear for Gleason ≤7 (using PSA 4.1–10.0 ng/ml as the referent, n = 359 898), with an AHR of 0.41 (p = 0.13) for PSA ≤2.5 ng/ml (n = 37 812) versus 1.38, 2.28, and 4.61 for PSA of 2.6–4.0 (n = 54 152), 10.1–20.0 (n = 63 319), and >20.0 ng/ml (n = 35 459), respectively (pinteraction < 0.001). Gleason 8–10, PSA ≤2.5 ng/ml disease had a significantly higher PCSM than standard high-risk/very high-risk disease with PSA >2.5 ng/ml (AHR 2.15, p = 0.002; 47-mo PCSM 14% vs 4.9%). Among Gleason 8–10 patients treated with radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy was associated with a survival benefit for PSA >2.5 ng/ml (AHR 0.87; p < 0.001) but not ≤2.5 ng/ml (AHR 1.36; p = 0.084; pinteraction = 0.021). For Gleason 8–10 tumors, PSA ≤2.5 ng/ml was associated with higher expression of neuroendocrine/small-cell markers compared to >2.5 ng/ml (p = 0.046), with no such relationship for Gleason ≤7 disease.

Conclusions

Low-PSA, high-grade prostate cancer has very high risk for PCSM, potentially responds poorly to androgen deprivation therapy, and is associated with neuroendocrine genomic features.

Patient summary

In this study, we found that low–prostate-specific antigen, high-grade prostate cancer has a very high risk for prostate cancer death, may not respond well to androgen deprivation therapy, and is associated with neuroendocrine genomic features. These findings suggest that current nomograms and treatment paradigms may need modification.

Introduction

Most prostate cancers are adenocarcinomas, and a high tumor grade (Gleason 8–10) is an established high-risk feature. Treatment options include radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy with long-course androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) [1].

Prostate cancer is typically highly androgen-dependent and exquisitely sensitive to ADT [2]. In addition, PSA production is positively regulated by androgens [3]. Although PSA is typically elevated in high-grade disease, some patients present with the discordant scenario of high-grade disease and low PSA. The clinical and biological implications of low PSA in high-grade prostate cancer are unclear [4]. Low-PSA, high-grade disease may represent a unique entity with underlying dedifferentiated biology, and as such may respond poorly to current standard treatments, particularly ADT. However, there are few clinical and biological data to support this hypothesis [5], [6], [7], [8].

The canonical low–PSA-producing prostate cancer is neuroendocrine prostate cancer, including the small-cell variant, which represents an aggressive and hormone-resistant entity [9], [10], [11], [12]. There is low sensitivity for the detection of neuroendocrine features on biopsy or RP specimens [9]. Emerging genomic characterization of neuroendocrine prostate cancer has identified common mutations that represent a “molecular signature” that may aid in detection and targeted therapy [12], [13], [14], [15]. Whether low-PSA, high-grade disease shares genomic features with neuroendocrine prostate cancer has not been explored.

Understanding the biology and behavior of low-PSA, high-grade prostate cancer is highly relevant; there is an active effort to improve the understanding and outcomes of aggressive localized prostate cancers through the utilization of genomics and application of targeted agents [16], [17], [18], [19]. Therefore, we characterized the prognostic and predictive values of low PSA in high-grade prostate cancer, as well as the genomic features of this entity among men diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Section snippets

NCDB and SEER

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) captures 70% of incident cancers in the USA [20] and identified 494 793 patients diagnosed with cT1–4N0M0 prostate cancer from 2004 to 2011. The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program encompasses 28% of the US population [21] and identified 136 113 men diagnosed with cT1–4N0M0 prostate cancer from 2010 to 2013. Patients with neuroendocrine or small-cell histology were excluded. PSA values in SEER from 2010 onwards have been audited for

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics for the NCDB, SEER, and Decipher GRID cohorts are shown in Table 1, Supplementary Table 1, and Supplementary Table 2, respectively. Of the men with Gleason 8–10 tumors in the NCDB cohort, 5.6% presented with PSA ≤2.5 ng/ml. The median follow-up was 25.0 mo for the SEER cohort and 48.9 mo for the NCDB cohort.

Prognostic outcomes: estimates of PCSM and ACM by PSA level, stratified by Gleason score

Among men with Gleason 8–10 disease and using PSA 4.1–10.0 ng/ml as the referent, the distribution of PCSM in the SEER cohort was U-shaped with respect to PSA, with an

Discussion

In this large, contemporary study of patients from three national cohorts, we found that low-PSA, high-grade prostate cancer appears to be a unique and aggressive entity among men with prostate cancer, with poor clinical outcomes and genomic features of neuroendocrine dedifferentiation. Characterization of this disease as a unique entity distinguishable by expression profiling from other high-grade prostate adenocarcinomas has not been reported in the literature, and the implications of these

Conclusions

In summary, low-PSA, high-grade prostate cancer appears to be a unique entity among men with prostate cancer that has very high risk for prostate cancer death, potentially responds poorly to ADT, and is more likely to be associated with neuroendocrine genomic features. Clinicians, researchers, and patients need to be aware of the potentially worse oncologic outcomes associated with this newly characterized disease. We recommend a concerted effort from the prostate cancer research community to

References (28)

  • B.A. Mahal et al.

    Association of very low prostate-specific antigen levels with increased cancer-specific death in men with high-grade prostate cancer

    Cancer

    (2016)
  • R. Aggarwal et al.

    Neuroendocrine prostate cancer: subtypes, biology, and clinical outcomes

    J Natl Compr Canc Netw

    (2014)
  • J.I. Epstein et al.

    Proposed morphologic classification of prostate cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation

    Am J Surg Pathol

    (2014)
  • H. Beltran et al.

    Molecular characterization of neuroendocrine prostate cancer and identification of new drug targets

    Cancer Discov

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    Please visit www.eu-acme.org/europeanurology to read and answer questions on-line. The EU-ACME credits will then be attributed automatically.

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    These authors are joint senior authors.

    View full text