Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 75, Issue 3, March 2019, Pages e51-e52
European Urology

Research Letter
The Case Against the European Medicines Agency's Change to the Label for Radium-223 for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.003Get rights and content

Cited by (18)

  • Radium-223 for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with asymptomatic bone metastases progressing on first-line abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide: A single-arm phase II trial

    2022, European Journal of Cancer
    Citation Excerpt :

    Approved indications for 223Ra vary from the USA or Australia that do have any limit to a specific line of treatment [41,42] to Europe restricting the 223Ra indication to patients with mCRPC who have had two previous systemic treatments (other than ADT) or who cannot receive other treatments [43]. Although this recommendation was based on the results of the ERA 223 trial [11], many concerns have been raised about the potential missing opportunity to benefit from 223Ra therapy for many patients with mCRPC who are more likely to have developed visceral disease [44]. We aim for our findings to establish the use of 223Ra in the patient population considered here and to drive development of further studies.

  • The Role of Theranostics in Prostate Cancer

    2021, Seminars in Radiation Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    REASSURE is evaluating the long-term safety and occurrence of primary second malignancies during a 7-year follow-up period and to date, the rate and degree of severity of treatment-related adverse events seen in follow-up in both this trial43 and the ALSYMPCA trial42 are not substantially different from those observed in the original ALSYMPCA trial.9 The primary safety concern raised by 223Ra concerns the use of the drug in combination with the novel AR-inhibitor abiraterone as a first-line therapy, which has been associated with increased risk of bone fractures; this is described in greater detail later in this review.44,45 Currently, 223Ra is administered according to standard fixed doses based on patient weight.

  • Radiopharmaceuticals for Bone Metastases

    2021, Seminars in Radiation Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The EMA, citing a HR of 1.376 (0.972-1.948; P = 0.07) of worse non-bone progression in the radium-223 arm,34 and suggested aggressively restricting radium-223 to patients who had received two previous mCRPC systemic treatments and were unable to receive other treatments. This prompted criticism by some,35 as the findings were associated with concurrent abiraterone and prednisone use, were ameliorated by bone protective agents, and were not seen in a clinically overt manner in the ALSYMPCA cohort of patients not treated with concomitant systemic therapy. Many argued that restricting radium to the third line would potentially remove a window when patients would demonstrably benefit from radium-223 in a state of bone-only, nonvisceral metastases.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text