Measuring hindfoot alignment in weight bearing CT: A novel clinical relevant measurement method
Introduction
Hindfoot alignment has classically been determined using a hindfoot alignment view [1], [2] or a long axial view on plain radiography [3], [4].
Measurements on long axial view radiographs showed a superior inter-observer agreement, compared with hindfoot alignment radiographs [5].
However, all hindfoot alignment measurements based on standard radiographs impose a substantial risk for measurement errors due to malpositioning, superpositioning, inconsistent angulation or enlargement of foot and ankle skeletal structures caused by the radiographic fan beam [6], [7].
An accurate knowledge of both axial and rotational alignment is required to objectify preoperative status and achieve surgical correction of hindfoot malalignment [8], [9].
Computed tomography (CT) provides this accurate anatomical information, but most available CT's in clinical setting are limited to a supine position [10], [11] or to loading by an external apparatus [12]. The importance of load bearing for the interpretation of hindfoot alignment has been shown by Kido et al., with the occurrence of joint instability when loading the hindfoot in patients with pedes plani [13].
Recent advances therefore focused on this importance and newly developed CT scanner technology now allows full bipedal weight bearing [14]. Current results show significant different measurements of both hind, middle and forefoot alignment angles when compared to supine imaging [15], [16]. However current measurements lack a clinically relevant and reproducible method to determine hindfoot alignment on weithbearing CT. This is hampered in addition by the limited amount of distal tibia scanned by current cone beam technology.
Therefore the hypothesis in this study is two-fold. First we hypothesized if it would be possible to determine a clinically relevant and reproducible method to measure hindfoot alignment on weightbearing CT.
The second hypothesis investigated whether the anatomical axis of tibia obtained from the full leg was more reliable than the short end of the tibia scanned by the cone beam CT.
Section snippets
Study population and design
Sixty malalignments of the hindfoot were retrospectively reviewed from forty-six patients referred by the department of orthopaedics for radiographic imaging of the hindfoot.
These were divided into two groups; group one contained a valgus alignment (n = 30) and group two a varus alignment (n = 30) of the hindfoot. This division was based on referral indications of the orthopaedic surgeon.
The indications in group one consisted out of osteoarthritis of the hindfoot (n = 12), tibialis posterior type II
Valgus alignment
Measurements in the valgus alignment group of cohort showed a mean HARX LA = 16.4°, mean HACT CL = 25.2°, HACT LA = 17.7°, HACT NOV = 20.1° (Table 1). These mean hindfoot angles differed significantly from each other when measured radiographically, clinically and on weight bearing CT (Table 2). Radiographic measurements all showed a positive correlation with clinical measurements on 3D images (Fig. 4a). The highest correlation was seen with the novel hindfoot alignment angle. Talar shift showed a high
Discussion
This study shows a novel method to measure hindfoot alignment in a weightbearing CT. Applying the same long axial measurement method as used in standard radiographs also showed to be possible by inclination of the images (Fig. 1c). However this attributed no added value because weightbearing CT overcomes superposition of the osseous structures and an additional rotation may imply a greater measurement error as shown by lower rater reliability of the HACT LA (Table 1).
Other methods to determine
Conclusion
This study shows a novel clinical relevant method in weight bearing CT to determine hindfoot alignment. We advocate its use in clinical practice because it answers the first hypothesis by showing a positive correlation with previous hindfoot angles, a high correlation with clinical images and an excellent reproducibility. Moreover the talar shift on which the angle is based can aid the surgeon preoperatively in determining how much translation is necessary to obtain a neutral alignment during a
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare to have no conflict of interest or a financial disclosure of any support received.
The authors state to approve the manuscript and its submission to the journal.
Acknowledgements
The authors declare no conflict of interest or acceptance of external funding.
References (28)
- et al.
The indications and technique of supramalleolar osteotomy
Foot Ankle Clin
(2009) - et al.
PedCAT for 3D-imaging in standing position allows for more accurate bone position (angle) measurement than radiographs or CT
Foot Ankle Surg
(2014) Reference axes for reconstruction of the knee
Knee
(2004)Clinical hindfoot measurement: a critical review of the literature
Foot
(1995)- et al.
Reliability of clinical and radiographic measurement of rearfoot alignment in a patient population
Foot
(2001) Posterior roentgenogram of the foot
Clin Orthop Relat Res
(1976)- et al.
The hindfoot alignment view
Foot Ankle Int
(1995) - et al.
A roentgenographic study of the development of the calcaneus by means of the posterior tangential view
J Bone Joint Surg
(1961) - et al.
Static rearfoot alignment: a comparison of clinical and radiographic measures
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc
(2005) - et al.
Measuring hindfoot alignment radiographically: the long axial view is more reliable than the hindfoot alignment view
Skeletal Radiol
(2010)
Hindfoot alignment measurements: rotation-stability of measurement techniques on hindfoot alignment view and long axial view radiographs
Am J Roentgenol
The reliability and validity of radiographic measurements for determining the three-dimensional position of the talus in varus and valgus osteoarthritic ankles
Skeletal Radiol
Osteotomies of the distal tibia and hindfoot for ankle realignment
Orthopade
Computed tomography of the hindfoot
J Comput Assist Tomogr
Cited by (89)
Imaging modalities for non-acute pathologies of the foot and ankle
2024, Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and TraumaSupramalleolar Osteotomies in Cavovarus Foot Deformity: Why Patient-Specific Instruments Make a Difference
2023, Foot and Ankle ClinicsCone-Beam Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography of Ankle Arthritis and Total Ankle Arthroplasty
2023, Foot and Ankle ClinicsEffect of total ankle replacement on the 3-dimensional subtalar joint alignment in varus ankle osteoarthritis
2023, Foot and Ankle Surgery