Elsevier

The Foot

Volume 21, Issue 2, June 2011, Pages 92-102
The Foot

The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: Assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2011.02.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Previously validated for hallux valgus surgery, the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) is here evaluated for use with different regions of the foot and ankle. The study recruited 671 consecutive patients (87.8% of those eligible), mean age 52.8 years, 64% female, who completed the MOXFQ and SF-36 general health survey before foot or ankle surgery. Surgeons completed the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scales and indicated that the patients’ main regions for surgery were: Hallux 210 (31.3%), Lesser toes 119 (17.7%), Mid foot 22 (3.3%), Ankle/hind foot 311 (46.3%), Multiple/whole foot 9 (1.3%). Individual MOXFQ items were assessed in terms of response rate and floor/ceiling effects, with the validity of the three MOXFQ scales (Walking/standing, Pain, and Social interaction) being assessed in terms of item-total correlations, internal and test–retest reliability, and construct validity. MOXFQ item response rates were high (all >98%). Cronbach's alphas of >0.7 confirmed internal consistency of all three scales. Test–retest ICCs were all ≥0.89. Correlations of >0.4 obtained with related SF-36 and AOFAS scales supported a priori hypotheses.

Good measurement properties are confirmed for the MOXFQ in the context of baseline assessment of patients receiving surgery for a variety of foot or ankle problems.

Introduction

A wide range of foot and ankle disorders are treated surgically constituting around one fifth of orthopaedic practice [1]. Foot and ankle surgery is associated with a high level of patient dissatisfaction which translates into considerable litigious activity [2], [3]. There is therefore an urgent need for scientific evaluation of foot and ankle surgery, which in turn requires the employment of appropriate (patient-focused) standard methods of outcomes assessment [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Outcome measures need to be validated in the context in which they are to be used.

There is also a need for an outcome measure that is suitable for assessing interventions to all regions of the foot and ankle. There are many reasons for this: because feet and ankles are complex weight-bearing structures with numerous interconnected moving parts, a problem in one area can generate problems elsewhere in the foot or ankle [9]; likewise, treatment to one region can potentially have an affect on another region. It is also common for people to have more than one foot and ankle problem concurrently, particularly if they have a condition (such as various types of arthritis or congenital deformities), that affects – or requires correction of – more than one structure in the foot or ankle. In the surgical context, the precise form or number of surgical procedures – and regions of the foot that they will involve – may not be known before surgery commences and reveals the full extent of the problem, while baseline measures need to be obtained prior to surgery.

Devised with input from patients representing a variety of foot problems [10], [11], the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) was first evaluated in the context of patients (95% females) undergoing surgery for hallux valgus. In this context it was shown to be acceptable, reliable, valid and responsive [10], [12]. It has since been translated into Italian, in which study the reliability and validity of the instrument was reconfirmed in the context of hallux valgus surgery [13]. It has also been applied in the context of surgery for hallux rigidus [14].1

This paper reports results from a study to evaluate the MOXFQ in patients undergoing, at a regional surgical centre, a wide variety of operations on the foot and ankle. Here we examine MOXFQ item response rates, distribution (floor/ceiling effects) and item to total scale correlations; and for the 3 MOXFQ subscales, we examine internal consistency and test–retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity. Results are presented for all patients scheduled for foot or ankle surgery and separately (where appropriate), for patients having surgery on different regions of the foot and ankle.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

NHS Research Ethics Committee approval was obtained (ref 08/H0604/68) and all subjects consented to participate in the study.

Study sample

The baseline study sample consisted of 671 patients (representing 739 feet booked for surgery, with only one foot from bilateral cases included in analyses presented here – see Section 2.4).

Surgeons indicated that 211 (31.4%) patients were having surgery on the Hallux region, 155 (23.1%) on the Lesser toes, 42 (6.3%) on the Midfoot, 306 (45.6%) on their Ankle/hindfoot, with 15 (2.2%) having surgery on multiple regions or the whole foot. Thus 58 (8.6%) were having surgery on more than one region

Discussion

The 16 item MOXFQ evolved from an earlier questionnaire, which had addressed themes identified from interviews conducted with people, who had a wide range of foot problems, in mainly primary care settings [11]. In the MOXFQ developmental study [10], further interviews with patients undergoing surgery for hallux valgus, confirmed that the same broad themes remained relevant, although extra items addressing symptom severity were required, together with other amendments. The MOXFQ was then

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflict of interest in relation to this study/paper.

Acknowledgements

We should like to thank The BUPA Foundation (the medical charity) for their generous funding of this research project. The sponsor has had no other involvement with the study or with the decision to submit this manuscript.

We should also like to thank all the patients who contributed their views and time to this study.

References (32)

  • P.C. Amadio

    Outcomes measurements [editorial]

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1993)
  • R. Fitzpatrick et al.

    Quality of life measures in health care. I. Applications and issues in assessment

    BMJ

    (1992)
  • D. Tiberio

    Pathomechanics of structural foot deformities

    Phys Ther

    (1988)
  • J. Dawson et al.

    A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery: validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus

    Qual Life Res

    (2006)
  • A. Marinozzi et al.

    Italian translation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, with re-assessment of reliability and validity

    Qual Life Res

    (2009)
  • J.E.J. Ware et al.

    The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection

    Med Care

    (1992)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text