Interpreting group differences using Demirjian's dental maturity method
Introduction
Demirjian's dental maturity method [1], [2], [3] is a useful tool to assess dental maturity for the individual child. Numerous researchers have applied this method to groups of children in various parts of the world and the significant differences between most groups and the reference have been interpreted as either a true population difference or a secular trend. Many authors have used this to justify the need for population specific dental maturity scores, however, there is growing evidence that this is probably unnecessary. The aim of this paper were to describe the variation in (1) dental maturity score by age groups and (2) age by maturity score categories using a large database [4], [5] and discuss the adapted scores for boys from published studies from different world regions in the light of this variation.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The data were from a large collaborative database of cross-sectional, retrospective dental radiographs set up by Chaillet et al. of children of European origin in Australia, Belgium, Canada, England, Finland, France, and Sweden with a small group from South Korea [4]. Dental maturity and the variation in age of individual tooth stages have been documented [5], [6]. The sample for this study consisted of radiographic data of individuals aged 2–18 (N = 4710 males, N = 4661 females). For the first
Results
The variation of dental maturity score and age is illustrated in Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3. Mean maturity score, standard deviation, standard error of mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) by 6-month and 1-year age groups is shown in Fig. 2, Fig. 3 and Table 1, Table 2. The age groups with the highest standard deviation are from 5 to 8 years of age in males and 4 to 7 in females. This corresponds to the section of the maturity curve with the steepest slope. For instance a boy aged from 7.00 to
Discussion
Demirjian's method is designed to assess the developing dentition of an individual child. The formation stages of the left mandibular teeth (excluding third molar) are assessed, the individual scores for each of the seven stages are summed and this is converted to a single dental age which represents the average age of a child for that score. The clinical interpretation of this indicates if the child is dentally advanced, average or delayed compared to the reference. It is clear from Fig. 1,
Conclusions
The numerous significant differences in Demirjian's dental maturity method in different groups, interpreted incorrectly as population differences, are at odds with the available evidence of the similarity in maturity of individual tooth formation stages between world groups. Possible explanations for differences in average dental age and known age using Demirjian's method include the weighted scores, complex equations and the inclusion of mature individuals. Demirjian's method remains a useful,
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Nils Chaillet (CHU Sainte-Justine Research Centre, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada) who organised the collaboration for this database and to Marjatta Nyström, Hakan Mörnstad, Kian Rowlings, Jane Taylor, Guy Willems and their co-authors for sharing data. The views in this paper are my own and do not represent any of these collaborators.
References (40)
- et al.
Dental age assessment: the applicability of Demirjian's method in South Indian children
Forensic Sci. Int.
(1998) - et al.
Dental age in central Poland
Forensic Sci. Int.
(2008) - et al.
Variation in modern human enamel formation times
J. Hum. Evol.
(2006) - et al.
Variation in modern human premolar enamel formation times: implications for Neandertals
J. Hum. Evol.
(2008) - et al.
A new system of dental age assessment
Hum. Biol.
(1973) - et al.
New systems for dental maturity based on seven and four teeth
Ann. Hum. Biol.
(1976) - A. Demirjian, Dental development, CD-ROM, Silver Platter Education, University of Montreal, Montreal,...
- et al.
Comparison of dental maturity in children of different ethnic origins: international maturity curves for clinicians
J. Forensic Sci.
(2005) - et al.
Timing of Demirjian tooth formation stages
Ann. Hum. Biol.
(2006) - H.M. Liversidge, Demirjian stage tooth formation results from a large group of children. Dent. Anthropol., in...
Dental maturation in French children and adolescents
Rev. Orthop. Dento. Faciale
Dental maturity in Finnish children estimated from the development of seven permanent mandibular teeth
Acta Odontol. Scand.
Comparison of dental maturity between the rural community of Kuhmo in northeastern Finland and the city of Helsinki
Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol.
Dental maturity standards in southern Finland
Proc. Finn. Dent. Soc.
Study of dental maturity in children aged 3–16 years in Chengdu
J. W. China Univ. Med. Sci.
Dental age in southwest Germany. A radiographic study
J. Orofac. Orthop.
Dental age estimation in Belgian children: Demirjian's technique revisited
J. Forensic Sci.
A modification of the Demirjian method for age estimation in children
J. Forensic Odontostomatol.
A comparison between dental maturity rate in the Swedish and Korean population using a modified Demirjian method
J. Forensic Odontostomatol.
Assessment of dental maturity of Brazilian children aged 6 to 14 years using Demirjian's method
Int. J. Paediatr. Dent.
Cited by (47)
Population variation in diaphyseal growth and age estimation of juvenile skeletal remains
2021, Remodeling Forensic Skeletal Age: Modern Applications and New Research DirectionsAge estimation of Hispanic children using the London Atlas
2018, Forensic Science InternationalRelationship between body mass and dental and skeletal development in children and adolescents
2016, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsAssessment of legal adult age of 18 by measurement of open apices of the third molars: Study on the Albanian sample
2014, Forensic Science International