Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 24, Issue 1, August 2006, Pages 77-84
Gait & Posture

Identification and characterisation of heel strike transient

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.07.008Get rights and content

Abstract

This study set out to ascertain the incidence of a heel strike transient (HST) and to verify whether modifications of muscle activation time could be correlated with the presence and the characteristic of a HST. Lower limb kinematics, kinetics and surface electromyography (SEMG) of normal subjects were examined during barefoot walking. A short-lived sharp HST was present in 76% of the trials while a smooth HST, of longer duration was seen in 13.3% of the trials. The transient phenomenon was absent in the remaining 10.7% of trials. The SEMG showed that alteration in the activation timing of muscles correlated with the presence of a HST.

Introduction

During normal walking the function of the foot at the onset of the support phase is to smooth impact with the ground thereby protecting the rear foot and shank from impulsive loads [1], [2]. The lower limb can be exposed to an impulsive load, the heel strike transient (HST), at heel strike (HS) [3], [4], [5]. In the literature the HST has been described as appearing in the vertical component of the ground reaction force (GRF) [6], [7] as an impulsive event located at 10% of the stance phase and characterised by a frequency range 10–75 Hz [3]. It has also been previously considered an artefact and the uncertain identification of a HST until 1985 was mainly due to the low cut-off of the filters used for force-plate data pre-processing [7], [8].

HST is correlated with the aetiology and progression of a variety of pathological conditions, such as osteoarthritis and low back pain [9], [10], [11]. It is considered potentially harmful for joints because of its intensity and its occurrence at each step. It has also been implicated in early prosthetic damage after total knee replacement [12], [13]. HST has also been observed in normal subjects [14].

The aetiology of HST has not yet been completely clarified. O’Connor and co-workers [15] hypothesised a relationship between the absence of quadriceps action and the presence of a HST. Their results were based on two subjects examined during free walking after an injection of xylocaine to the femoral nerve that produced a reversible paralysis of the quadriceps. This would have caused a deceleration of the lower limb before HS and a hard contact of the heel with the ground. Compensatory mechanisms induced by the temporary paralysis may also have been important and so the onset of HST may not have been due solely to the influence of quadriceps activation.

Both passive tissue properties and active movements of lower limbs contribute to cushioning of the foot at impact with the ground. The impact intensity on the floor can be reduced by shock-absorbing reactions at the ankle, knee and hip. Foot pronation is one of the mechanisms that reduce the impact and another is the control the acceleration of the leg landing on the ground just before foot contact [11], [15]. In both cases, muscle activation plays a key role [1], [2]. A HST is also seen in young healthy subjects [16], which warrants further investigation.

The purpose of our investigation was to characterise the HST further, to define it in terms of amplitude, time and frequency localisation and to investigate possible correlations between HST presence and alteration of muscular activation timing (AT).

Section snippets

Subjects

Twenty-five normal subjects, 15 females and 10 males (mean age of 23 ± 3.02 years, mean height 1.68 ± 0.12 m, mean body mass 63.62 ± 13.68 kg) were enrolled in the study. They all practised sport regularly at an amateur level. Informed, written consent was obtained.

Experimental protocol

Initially each subject walked barefoot to familiarise themselves with the laboratory environment. They then walked at their preferred cadence and up and down the walkway so that their dominant leg contacted the force plate. Data were

Results

The signal processing technique allowed a reliable identification of HST in the vertical and anterior–posterior components of GRF. Seventy-five valid trials were processed. The repeatability of the phenomenon in the trials for each subject was consistent for 24 out of 25 subjects. The HST was deemed present only if its simultaneous occurrence was noticed in both components [24]. Two different patterns of the HST were noted (Fig. 3). A sharp transient had an impulsive irregularity, was

Discussion

This study integrated information from kinematics, dynamics and electromyography and reliably identified a HST. The GRF and the muscular AT during walking were useful in characterising the HST. With respect to the SEMG processing, the wavelet transform technique was used as an on–off detector. The use of WT for GRF analysis is critical for the reliable recognition of the HST from the cross-validation of its presence in both the vertical and antero-posterior components of the GRF. WT identified

References (30)

  • J. Perry

    Gait analysis—normal and pathological function

    SLACK

    (1992)
  • V.T. Inman et al.

    Human walking

    (1981)
  • L. Light et al.

    Skeletal transients on heel strike in normal walking with different footwear

    J Biomech

    (1980)
  • L. Light et al.

    Heel strike transient and likely implications

    J Bone Joint Surg [Br] B

    (1980)
  • P.R. Cavanagh et al.

    A comparison of the ground reaction forces during the walking barefoot and in shoes

    Biomechanics VII-b

    (1981)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text