Effects of adiposity on postural control and cognition
Introduction
The terms overweight and obesity are defined as abnormal/excessive fat accumulation with Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 and 30 kg/m2, respectively [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that more than 1.9 billion adults are overweight worldwide; with 600 million obese adults in 2014 [1]. In the U.S., the situation is exacerbated with 78.6 million adults being classified as obese in 2012 [2].
Postural instability is defined as the inability to successfully respond to perturbations during upright stance [3] and is frequently associated with reduced sensorimotor function and increased fall risk [4], [5]. Impaired motor function due to an increase in adiposity may severely impact quality of life and increase the risk of reduced postural stability and injury by falls [6], [7]. Several studies have examined the relationship between obesity and postural control in adults. Hue et al. reported that increased body weight strongly correlated with decreased balance stability [8]. Similarly, increased body weight has been associated with increased anterior–posterior (AP) center of pressure (COP) movement [9]. Increased sway areas and an inability to modulate anticipatory actions suggests that obese participants use different postural strategies to maintain balance [10]. In contrast, Blaszczyk et al. suggested preserved postural control in obese adults [11], a notion later challenged in [12]. A primary limitation in these studies is that they used BMI as the primary classification method for identifying different weight groups; however, BMI only takes body mass and height into consideration. The exclusive use of BMI is flawed as a method to distinguish highly muscular persons from persons with high body fat percentages. Inconsistent outcomes from previous studies might have resulted from the use of BMI for classification. Using measures of fat amount may better illustrate the relationship between excessive adiposity and postural control.
Deficits in cognitive function have been reported as a powerful predictor of falls and correlate to dramatic increases in fall risks [13]. Recently, obesity has been linked with memory deficits and cognitive dysfunction in middle-aged and older adults [14], [15]. Increased adiposity, resulting in obesity, may require additional attention for controlling posture [16]. Cognitive-motor interference, defined as decrements in performance that occur when cognitive and motor tasks are performed simultaneously (dual-task conditions), has been linked with falls [15]. A priori, we did not expect to see cognitive deficits in this study due to the narrow age range of participants in the current study; however, these data are the first step in preparing a larger scale evaluation of cognitive-motor deficits with respect to adiposity, aging, and neurological disease. Examining postural control during cognitive tasks will provide valuable information regarding the relationship among motor function, cognitive distraction, and excessive adiposity.
The objective of the current study was to examine responses during cognitive-motor tasks using different assessments of adiposity. The correlations among BMI, body composition, postural control, and cognitive performance were examined to clarify and explore the impact of adiposity on postural stability. We hypothesized that: (1) measures of postural control will deteriorate as indices of adiposity increase; and (2) whole body fat percentage (%FatTOTAL) and trunk fat percentage (%FatTRUNK) will exhibit more consistent relationships with postural control as compared to BMI. The results of this study advance our understanding of the true relationship of adiposity, body mass, and body fat distribution on postural control and cognitive performance.
Section snippets
Subjects
Thirty total individuals participated in the study. Participants were classified into three groups based upon their BMI scores at the onset of the study. The normal weight (BMI: 18.5–24.9 kg/m2), the overweight (BMI: 25–29.9 kg/m2) and the obese groups (BMI: 30–40 kg/m2) each had five females and 5 males (Table 1). Prior to recruitment, participants completed a Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) and the Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ). Exclusion criteria included: a history
Results
Overall, the data showed that as BMI and %Fat increased, participants’ postural performance decreased in N-back testing and SOT. However, neither BMI nor %Fat had negative effects on neither cognitive performance nor motor performance during the presence of physical external perturbations (MCT).
Discussion
The goal of the current study was to investigate the relationship between adiposity and cognitive and motor functions. Of the two hypotheses formulated in the introduction, the first hypothesis was partially confirmed and the second hypothesis was confirmed. Compared to BMI, %FatTOTAL and %FatTRUNK exhibited more consistent trends regarding postural performance.
Conclusions
Overall, our findings indicate that obesity is associated with reduced postural control, where %Fat is a better predictor of postural control as compared to BMI, indicating that DEXA analysis is a superior method of obesity classification. The mechanism underlying the association between adiposity and postural control remains unclear and requires further investigation.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors have financial or personal relationships causing conflicts of interest to report.
Acknowledgements
Funding support for this project was received from the Summer Research Support Program in the Department of Health and Human Performance at the University of Houston.
References (29)
- et al.
Body weight is a strong predictor of postural stability
Gait Posture
(2007) - et al.
Postural control in obese adolescents assessed by limits of stability and gait initiation
Gait Posture
(2008) - et al.
Effects of excessive body weight on postural control
J Biomech
(2009) - et al.
Balance control is altered in obese individuals
J Biomech
(2010) - et al.
Attentional demands for postural control: the effects of aging and sensory reintegration
Gait Posture
(2001) - et al.
Kinematic and kinetic validity of the inverted pendulum model in quiet standing
Gait Posture
(2004) - et al.
Sensorimotor posture control in the blind: superior ankle proprioceptive acuity does not compensate for vision loss
Gait Posture
(2013) - et al.
Postural stability of diabetic patients with and without cutaneous sensory deficit in the foot
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
(1997) - et al.
Recurrence analysis of human postural sway during the sensory organization test
Neurosci Lett
(2003) - et al.
Balance control impairment in obese individuals is caused by larger balance motor commands variability
Gait Posture
(2015)