Elsevier

General Hospital Psychiatry

Volume 33, Issue 1, January–February 2011, Pages 23-28
General Hospital Psychiatry

Psychiatry and Primary Care2
Positive impact of a family practice-based depression case management on patient's self-management,☆☆,,★★,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.11.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Family practice-based depression case management improves depression symptoms and adherence to medication. The aim of this study was to explore the long-term effects of practice-based depression case management on patient depression-related self-management knowledge and activities.

Methods

This long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial study took place 12 months after the end of the 1-year case management intervention. We used a modified version of the depression-specific self-management questionnaire described in Ludman et al. [Psychol Med, 33 (2003) 1061–1070]. Analyses of self-management knowledge and activities used a linear mixed model accounting for practice cluster effects and treatment group.

Results

Of the 626 patients included at baseline, 439 (70.1%) participated 24 months later in this follow-up study, i.e., 12 months after the end of the intervention. Compared to control recipients, intervention recipients presented statistically significant increased knowledge of medication side-effects and felt more able to avoid situations that may trigger depression. They also tried more often to undertake enjoyable activities and set more time aside for these activities.

Conclusion

This study suggests that case management improves depression-related self-management knowledge and activities in depressed primary care patients 12 months after the end of the intervention.

Practice implications

Clinicians may consider introducing practice-based case management for improving patients' self-management activities and knowledge.

Introduction

Depressive disorders are a burden to individuals and society [1], [2]. The prevalence of major depression among the German general population is 2–4% [3] and 5–11% among patients receiving care from a family doctor [4]. Up to 30% of the population is burdened by depressive symptoms at least once in their lives [5], [6], and the probability of a relapse is 75% among those who have had an episode of a major depression [7].

In a systematic review, Gilbody et al. [8] showed that structured treatment programs, such as case management, induce better results than traditional medical care. Depressive symptoms can also be improved by means of a multimodular family practice-based care management program [9]. Effective strategies to improve depression symptoms are mostly complex interventions that require extensive training for doctors and patients, a more active role for non-physician staff and a higher degree of integration between primary and secondary care [10], [11], [12], [13]. Case management is a regular component of these strategies. It includes systematic observation of the patients, support for the continuation of treatment and measures to be taken in case of nonadherence or a lack of improvement [14]. Evidence suggesting the positive effects of case management on symptom development in patients with depression is strong [11], [15], [16], [17], [18]. The positive effects may be due to an increase in depression-related self-management knowledge and activities, since patients may handle the disease more actively and independently to overcome the burden [19]. Perceived self-efficacy describes the patient's subjective sureness of his ability to handle difficult situations [20]. In contrast, self-management strives to activate a process of change that includes the patient's active involvement in his own current health situation by means of self-observation and the clarification of therapy goals [19], as also the Chronic Care Model has called for [21], [22]. However, evidence on long-term effects of improving patients' active self-management is still marginal. The aim of this study was to explore the long-term effects of a practice-based depression case management on patients' depression-related self-management knowledge and activities. We hypothesized that the case management intervention will improve self-management knowledge and activities.

Section snippets

The trial

This long-term follow-up study of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) sample was conducted 12 months after the end of the case management intervention provided by a practice-based health care assistant (HCA). The main trial was carried out between February 2005 and September 2007; this follow-up study, between September 2007 and September 2008. Details on patient recruitment, data collection and intervention have been published recently [23]. The intervention has proved to be effective in

Results

The main cluster RCT included 626 patients (310 intervention and 316 control recipients) at baseline. At this follow-up study that took place 24 months after baseline, i.e., 12 months after the end of the intervention, 439 (70.1 %) patients (n=209 intervention and n=230 control recipients) participated. There was no statistically significant difference in sex distribution and depression severity between patients participating and patients not participating at this follow-up study. However,

Discussion

This long-term follow-up study explored the self-management knowledge and activities of depressed patients in primary care, as Katon and Seelig [33] have called for [34]. Results from this study are the first to suggest that HCAs without professional training in behavioral activation, in tandem with family doctors, are able to provide depression-specific knowledge and behavioral advice to patients in a primary care setting. This is of public health relevance, since the intervention effect was

Acknowledgments

The Primary Care Monitoring for depressive Patients Trial (PRoMPT) has been awarded by the “German Research Award for Primary Care — Dr. Lothar Beyer Award 2008.” We thank all contributing patients and primary care practice teams.

References (52)

  • MoussaviS. et al.

    Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys

    Lancet

    (2007)
  • PattenS.B. et al.

    Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder in adults: I. Classification, burden and principles of management

    J Affect Disord

    (2009)
  • WittchenH.U. et al.

    Epidemiologie

  • BeckerN. et al.

    Prevalence and recognition of depressive disorders in German general practice — a systematic literature review

    Z Allg Med

    (2005)
  • BramesfeldA. et al.

    Prevalence of depression diagnosis and prescription of antidepressants in East and West Germany: an analysis of health insurance data

    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol

    (2010)
  • DemyttenaereK. et al.

    Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys

    JAMA

    (2004)
  • BschorT.

    Depression

  • GilbodyS. et al.

    Educational and organizational interventions to improve the management of depression in primary care: a systematic review

    JAMA

    (2003)
  • ZivinK. et al.

    Effectiveness of a depression disease management program in improving depression and work function — a pilot study

    Int J Psychiatry Med

    (2009)
  • ChristensenH. et al.

    Models in the delivery of depression care: a systematic review of randomised and controlled intervention trials

    BMC Fam Pract

    (2008)
  • GilbodyS. et al.

    Collaborative care for depression: a cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes

    Arch Intern Med

    (2006)
  • KatesN. et al.

    Chronic disease management for depression in primary care: a summary of the current literature and implications for practice

    Can J Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • WilliamsJ.W. et al.

    Systematic review of multifaceted interventions to improve depression care

    Gen Hosp Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • Von KorffM. et al.

    Improving outcomes in depression

    BMJ

    (2001)
  • UnutzerJ. et al.

    Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial

    JAMA

    (2002)
  • DietrichA.J. et al.

    Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial

    BMJ

    (2004)
  • DobschaS.K. et al.

    Depression decision support in primary care: a cluster randomized trial

    Ann Intern Med

    (2006)
  • GensichenJ. et al.

    Health care assistants in primary care depression management: role perception, burdening factors, and disease conception

    Ann Fam Med

    (2009)
  • SchwarzerR.

    Selbstwirksamkeit

  • WagnerE.H. et al.

    Improving outcomes in chronic illness

    Manag Care Q

    (1996)
  • WagnerE.H. et al.

    Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action

    Health Aff

    (2001)
  • GensichenJ. et al.

    Case management for depression by health care assistants in small primary care practices — a cluster randomized trial

    Ann Intern Med

    (2009)
  • SpitzerR.L. et al.

    Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study

    JAMA

    (1999)
  • GensichenJ. et al.

    Case management for the treatment of patients with major depression in general practices — rationale, design and conduct of a cluster randomized controlled trial — PRoMPT (PRimary care Monitoring for depressive Patient's Trial) [ISRCTN66386086] — study protocol

    BMC Public Health

    (2005)
  • BosleyS. et al.

    Healthcare assistants in general practice: practical and conceptual issues of skill-mix change

    Br J Gen Pract

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    Author contributions: Conception and design: Gensichen J, Petersen JJ, Karroum T, Rauck S, Ludman E, König J, Gerlach FM. Data collection: Gensichen J, Petersen JJ, Rauck S. Analysis and interpretation: Gensichen J, Petersen JJ, Karroum T, Rauck S, Ludman E, König J, Gerlach FM. Statistical analysis: König J, Gensichen J, Karroum T, Petersen JJ. Drafting of the article: Gensichen J, Karroum T, Petersen JJ. Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: all authors. Final approval of the article: all authors.

    ☆☆

    Obtaining funding: Gensichen J, Gerlach FM.

    Trial registration: The study was registered at the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Register (ISRCTN66386086).

    ★★

    Grant support for the Primary Care Monitoring for depressive Patients Trial (PRoMPT) came from the German Ministry of Education and Research (grant number 01GK0702).

    2

    Recent epidemiologic studies have found that most patients with mental illness are seen exclusively in primary care medicine. These patients often present with medically unexplained somatic symptoms and utilize at least twice as many health care visits as controls. There has been an exponential growth in studies in this interface between primary care and psychiatry in the last 10 years. This special section, edited by Jürgen Unutzer, M.D., will publish informative research articles that address primary care-psychiatric issues.

    1

    These authors contributed equally.

    View full text