Original article
Clinical endoscopy
Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.017Get rights and content

Background

Evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures typically involves collection and analysis of tissue or cells. Brush cytology and intraductal biopsies that are routinely performed during ERCP to assess malignant-appearing biliary strictures are limited by relatively low sensitivity.

Objective

To study the comparative effectiveness of brushings for cytology and intraductal biopsies in the etiology of biliary strictures.

Design

Meta-analysis.

Setting

Referral center.

Patients

PUBMED and Embase databases were reviewed for studies published to April 2014 where diagnostic correlation of histology was available.

Intervention

Database and review of study findings.

Main Outcome Measurements

Sensitivity and specificity.

Results

The pooled sensitivity and specificity of brushings for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40%-50%) and 99% (95% CI, 98%-100%), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio to detect malignant biliary strictures was 33.43 (95% CI, 14.29-78.24). For intraductal biopsies, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 48.1% (95% CI, 42.8%-53.4%) and 99.2% (95% CI, 97.6%-99.8%), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio to detect malignant biliary strictures was 43.18 (95% CI, 19.39-95.83). A combination of both modalities only modestly increased the sensitivity (59.4%; 95% CI, 53.7%-64.8%) with a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 98.8%-100.0%). The Begg-Mazumdar and Egger tests indicated a low potential for publication bias.

Limitations

Inclusion of low-quality studies.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that both brushings and biopsy are comparable and have limited sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures. A combination of both only modestly increases the sensitivity.

Section snippets

Medical literature search

A comprehensive search of the medical literature was performed to identify peer-reviewed articles that examined the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic retrograde biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsies to detect malignancy as the etiology of biliary strictures. We systematically searched the PUBMED and Embase databases for studies published from January 1980 to April 2014 by using the following search terms: “ERCP brush cytology and forceps biopsy,” “bile duct brush cytology,” and

Eligible studies and quality assessment

An initial medical literature search yielded 1121 articles. After excluding irrelevant studies, 42 potential studies were reviewed in detail. Of these, 9 studies (n = 730 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis.16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 The reported pooled estimates were calculated by the random-effects model. Figure 1 shows the flow diagram for studies identified for the systematic review. Table 1 lists the various studies included in the meta-analysis.

Discussion

Pancreatic cancer and CCA usually manifest as biliary strictures that are difficult to differentiate from strictures caused by bile duct stones, chronic pancreatitis, or other benign conditions. Cytological or histological diagnosis of the strictures alters the management plan significantly in terms of aggressive treatment of confirmed malignancies and avoiding unnecessary surgery in benign conditions. ERCP-based tissue diagnosis of suspicious biliary strictures can be achieved with brush

References (40)

  • R.J. Farrell et al.

    The combination of stricture dilation, endoscopic needle aspiration, and biliary brushings significantly improves diagnostic yield from malignant bile duct strictures

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2001)
  • V.K. Parasher et al.

    Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided cytology of malignant biliary strictures using a novel scraping brush

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1998)
  • M. de Bellis et al.

    Influence of stricture dilation and repeat brushing on the cancer detection rate of brush cytology in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2003)
  • F. Weilert et al.

    EUS-FNA is superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: results of a prospective, single-blind, comparative study

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2014)
  • M.A. Khashab et al.

    Utility of EUS in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures and suspected extrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma (with videos)

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2012)
  • J.K. Heimbach et al.

    Trans-peritoneal fine needle aspiration biopsy of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is associated with disease dissemination

    HPB (Oxford)

    (2011)
  • S. Friman

    Cholangiocarcinoma–current treatment options

    Scand J Surg

    (2011)
  • M.W. Saif

    Pancreatic neoplasm in 2011: an update

    JOP

    (2011)
  • E.G. Brown et al.

    Outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy: where should we focus our efforts on improving outcomes?

    JAMA Surg

    (2014)
  • A.Y. Chok et al.

    A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pancreaticoduodenectomy versus limited resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

    Ann Surg Oncol

    (2014)
  • Cited by (349)

    • Endoscopic Diagnosis of Extra-Luminal Cancers

      2024, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    DISCLOSURE: Dr Vargo is a consultant for Olympus, Boston Scientific, Ethicon Endosurgery, and Cook Endoscopy. Dr Parsi is a consultant for Boston Scientific. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this article.

    If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Navaneethan at [email protected].

    View full text