Original articleClinical endoscopyFactors associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis and the effect of pancreatic duct stenting in a pediatric population
Section snippets
Materials and methods
With institutional review board approval, a previously created ERCP database including all patients followed by pediatric gastroenterologists at UTSW Medical Center Dallas was queried. All ERCPs were performed between January 2004 and October 2013. Informed consent before ERCP was obtained from the patient’s parent or legal guardian in all instances. Patient and procedural data were retrospectively collected to identify risk factors for PEP. Postprocedural data were reviewed up to 2 weeks after
Results
Although 436 ERCPs were identified as being performed during the study period, 4 were excluded from analysis secondary to incomplete medical records. None of these 4 patients experienced pancreatitis after the procedure. Included in analysis were 432 ERCPs on 313 patients. The median age was 12.7 years (range 1 month to 19 years). Follow-up was documented following 363 patients (84.0%). Pancreatitis was identified as an adverse event following 47 (10.9%) of the 432 ERCPs included in analysis.
Discussion
Before this study, only 1 retrospective review specifically looked at trying to identify risk factors for the development of PEP in the pediatric population.11 The incidence of PEP in that review was low, only 2.5%, likely because the majority of cases reported were diagnostic studies and/or for biliary indications. Despite this low incidence, the authors identified performing a therapeutic case to be an independent risk factor for the development of PEP. Recent pediatric case reviews which
Conclusions
This observational study identified pancreatic duct injection and pancreatic sphincterotomy as being positively associated with the development of PEP in the pediatric population and having a history of chronic pancreatitis as being negatively associated with PEP. Although PEP is usually mild in pediatric patients, it can be moderate or severe. The criterion standard of pancreatic duct stenting for prophylaxis needs to be evaluated more closely because our study shows a positive association
References (23)
- et al.
ASGE guideline: the role of ERCP in diseases of the biliary tract and the pancreas
Gastrointest Endosc
(2005) - et al.
Complications of ERCP
Gastrointest Endosc
(2012) - et al.
Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
Gastrointest Endosc
(2011) Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: avoidance and management
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am
(2012)- et al.
A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop
Gastrointest Endosc
(2010) - et al.
Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party
Gastrointest Endosc
(2011) - et al.
Technical outcomes and complications of ERCP in children
Gastrointest Endosc
(2004) - et al.
Pancreatic-stent placement for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis
Gastrointest Endosc
(2007) - et al.
Prophylactic pancreatic stent placement and post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Endoscopy
(2010) - et al.
A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis
N Engl J Med
(2012)
Definitions of pediatric pancreatitis and survey of present clinical practices
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
Cited by (0)
DISCLOSURE: All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this article.
See CME section; p. 1439.