Literature reviewAgenesis, functional deficiency and the common type of the flexor digitorum superficialis of the little finger: A meta-analysisAgénésie, déficit fonctionnel, et variations anatomiques les plus courantes du flexor digitorum superficialis de l’auriculaire : une méta-analyse
Introduction
The flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) is an extrinsic muscle that arises by two heads – humeroulnar and radial [1], [2]. The muscle usually divides into two layers towards fingers 2 to 5. The superficial layer divides distally into two tendons for the middle and ring finger, while the deep layer gives tendons for the index and little finger [2], [3]. Thus, the tendons are arranged in two pairs within the carpal tunnel – the superficial pair consists of the middle and ring finger tendons, while the deep pair consists of the index and little finger tendons [4]. In each finger, the FDS tendon enters the digital flexor sheath (A1 pulley) and splits into two equal bundles that rotate, pass around and then behind the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). The two slips reunite deep to the FDP at Camper's chiasm, and insert as two separate slips on the anterior surface of the middle phalanx [5]. The FDS is a flexor of all the joints over which it passes: proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ), metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) joint and wrist [2].
The FDS is one of the most variable muscles in the human body. Its variations can be attributed to variations of the FDS muscle, FDS tendons or intertendinous connections (Fig. 1). Variations of the FDS muscle include accessory, absent or anomalous muscle bellies [6], [7], [8]. The FDS may have a thin, doubled, absent tendon or have a tendon slip arising from the FDP [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Intertendinous connections between the FDS and FDP are frequent, particularly between the FDS of adjacent fingers [9], [13]. However, the FDS of the little finger (FDS-5) is known to have the greatest variability compared to those of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th fingers. The FDS-5 is usually thinner (hypoplastic), functionally inferior to the FDS tendons of the other fingers, and sometimes connected to the FDS tendon of adjacent fingers, particularly the ring finger (FDS-4) [10], [11], [14], [15]. Variations of the FDS-5 can complicate its assessment in healthy individuals and in patients presenting with tendon injuries. An injury to the ring or little finger can cause a malfunction of either one when there are intertendinous connections between these two fingers [5], [16].
The following clinical tests described in the literature can be used to assess the ability of the FDS tendon to flex the PIPJ of the little finger and to classify its function:
- •
standard test: the subject is asked to flex the little finger while the three other fingers are held out in full extension; the wrist is kept in full supination and neutral extension (Fig. 2A, B). The result is considered positive when the subject can perform full flexion of the PIPJ of the little finger with extended distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) and the other three fingers. Inability to flex the PIPJ of the little finger is considered negative result [7];
- •
modified test: in the case of a negative or partial result following the standard test, the subject is asked to flex the PIPJ of the ring finger (Fig. 2C). The result is considered positive when the flexion of the PIPJ of the little finger is improved along with that of the ring finger. Inability to improve the PIPJ flexion of the little finger along with that of the ring finger is considered a negative result [10];
- •
Mishra's test: the subject is asked to press the fingertip pulp of all fingers together against the proximal part of the palm. The test is positive when the PIPJ and MCPJ of the little finger are fully flexed, while DIPJ remains in extension. If all three joints of the little finger are flexed, result of this test is negative [17];
- •
Tan's test (expanded examination method): the subject is asked to flex the finger of interest while the other three fingers are held out in full extension at the MCPJ and DIPJ. In the case of a negative or partial response, the subject is asked to free the adjacent fingers sequentially and re-test. The result is positive when the subject can flex the PIPJ of the little finger with extended DIPJ and the other three fingers. Inability to flex the PIPJ of the little finger independently of the DIPJ flexion is considered FDP substitution. If the PIPJ flexion of the released adjacent finger (or fingers) improves flexion of the PIPJ of the little finger, this is suggestive of a connection between the FDS-5 and the adjacent FDS-4 or FDS-3 [14].
If the tendon of the FDS-5 passes freely from the muscle belly through the fibro-osseous carpal tunnel with no attachment to the tendons of the adjacent fingers or structures, independent flexion of the PIPJ of the little finger is possible and the standard test will be positive (Fig. 1A, 1C, 1D, 1E, 1F). If the FDS-5 tendon is connected to the FDS-4 tendon, the standard test will be negative, but the modified test will be positive (Fig. 1I, J). A positive Mishra's test suggests independence of the FDS-5 tendon or presence of intertendinous connection between the FDS-5 and FDS of adjacent fingers. Tan's test is positive when the FDS-5 tendon is independent; this test may be useful for identifying intertendinous connections between the FDS-5 and FDS of adjacent fingers. Inability to flex the PIPJ of the little finger independently of the DIPJ flexion during Mishra's and Tan's test is considered as FDP substitution (Fig. 1B, G, H, K).
When reviewing the literature, a surprising discrepancy is noted between the very low frequency of FDS-5 agenesis reported in cadaver studies [6], [7], [9], [11], [18], [19], [20], [21] and the variable frequency of FDS-5 functional absence in clinical articles. The latter ranges from 0% in an Indian population to 30.77% in a British population [22], [23]. Clinical assessment of the FDS-5 tendon (functional ability of the FDS to flex the PIPJ) results in one of the following three outcomes: independent function (ability to flex the PIPJ of the fifth finger while the other fingers are extended), common function (ability to flex the PIPJ of the fifth finger only when the ring finger PIPJ is flexed simultaneously) and absent function (inability to flex the PIPJ even when flexion of the ring finger PIPJ is allowed) [9], [22], [24], [25], [26].
The aim of this systematic review was to generate weighted frequencies and compare the prevalence of cadaveric FDS-5 agenesis to those of clinical FDS-5 function (absence and common), and to look for possible association with ethnicity, laterality, gender and side.
Section snippets
Material and methods
A modified checklist of the MOOSE guidelines for meta-analyses and systematic reviews of observational studies [27] and the Checklist for Anatomical Reviews and Meta-Analysis (CARMA) served as the framework for this review [28].
Search results
The electronic search yielded 422 hits; 20 duplicates were removed. Fifty-two abstracts were thought to be potentially relevant and the full-text manuscript was retrieved. Twenty-three papers met the inclusion criteria along with four additional studies after reference checking. Reasons for exclusion are described in Fig. 3. Website checking of the above-mentioned journals identified another two relevant papers while websites searched for old manuscripts yielded an additional five studies.
In
Discussion
When both tests, i.e. standard and modified, are used to detect FDS-5 function, the weighted “clinical” frequency of FDS-5 tendon functional absence is found to be much lower (7.45%) when compared to studies using only the standard test or its variants, which reported frequencies of 33.3% and 42% [43], [44]. This finding should encourage researchers to systematically use both tests going forward because of the high prevalence of the common type of FDS-5 (37.5%) due to interconnections mainly
Conclusion
In all, this evidence-based anatomical meta-analysis greatly contributes to our anatomical knowledge of FDS-5 tendon origin, absence/functional deficiency and connections. This review has shed more light on the importance of adding the modified test to the standard test when assessing FDS function in a normal or injured hand. The expanded examination technique seems to be the most accurate in terms of completeness and should be the cornerstone of every preoperative tendon transfer assessment in
Financial disclosure statement
None.
Disclosure of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
References (52)
- et al.
Variations of the flexor digitorum superficialis of the small finger
J Hand Surg Am
(1989) - et al.
The little finger superficialis-clinical investigation of its anatomic and functional shortcomings
J Hand Surg Am
(1981) - et al.
Variations of the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon of the little finger
J Hand Surg Br
(1997) - et al.
Flexor digitorum superficialis tendon in the fingers of the human hand
Hand
(1974) - et al.
Variations of the flexor digitorum superficialis as determined by an expanded clinical examination
J Hand Surg Am
(2009) A new test for demonstrating the action of flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
(2006)- et al.
The clinical impact of the presence or absence of the fifth finger flexor digitorum superficialis on grip strength
J Hand Ther
(2003) - et al.
Clinical evaluation of flexor tendon function in the small finger
Ann Emerg Med
(1990) - et al.
Functional absence of flexor digitorum superficialis to the little finger and absence of palmaris longus-is there a link?
J Hand Surg Br
(2002) - et al.
Incidence of the inability to flex the proximal interphalangeal joint in normal subjects
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(1998)
The anatomy of the flexor digitorum superficialis relevant to tendon transfers
J Hand Surg Br
Flexor superficialis abductor transfer with carpal tunnel release for thenar palsy
J Hand Surg Am
Hypotheses for ongoing evolution of muscles of the upper extremity
Med Hypotheses
Anomalies of the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle
J Hand Surg Br
Clinical anatomy by regions
Gray's anatomy
Surgical anatomy of the hand and upper extremity
Green's operative hand surgery
Muscle tendon variations in the flexor compartment of the wrist
Plast Reconstr Surg
Muscular and tendinous variations of the flexor superficialis of the fifth finger of the hand
Bull Hosp Joint Dis
Structure of the flexor digitorum superficialis
Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn
Bilateral absence of flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon of the little finger: clinical significance
J Clin Diagn Res
A new examination method for anatomical variations of the flexor digitorum superficialis in the little finger
Clin Orthop Surg
ASSH Manual of hand surgery
Statistics on the musculature of the Japanese
Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn
Cited by (5)
Handbook of Muscle Variations and Anomalies in Humans: A Compendium for Medical Education, Physicians, Surgeons, Anthropologists, Anatomists, and Biologists
2022, Handbook of Muscle Variations and Anomalies in Humans: A Compendium for Medical Education, Physicians, Surgeons, Anthropologists, Anatomists, and BiologistsAbsence of flexor digitorum profundus muscle and variation of flexor digitorum superficialis muscle in a little finger: two case reports
2020, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy