Elsevier

Hand Clinics

Volume 26, Issue 3, August 2010, Pages 411-421
Hand Clinics

Use of Orthogonal or Parallel Plating Techniques to Treat Distal Humerus Fractures

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2010.05.008Get rights and content

Section snippets

Anatomy

The elbow joint is characterized as being a hinge joint because it only has a single axis of rotation.8 This rotation primarily occurs between the semilunar notch at the proximal part of the ulna and the trochlea at the distal end of the humerus. The trochlea is bounded on each side by a bony column, thus forming a bony construct that is analogous to a triangle. If any of the arms of the triangle are disrupted, the entire construct is weakened more than expected.9 Therefore, it is important to

Classification schemes

Fractures of the distal humerus have historically been classified based on anatomic considerations. Initially these fractures were classified based on the concept that the distal end of the humerus was made up of condyles. The terms supracondylar, condylar, transcondylar, and bicondylar fractures were used.12

Currently, fractures of the distal humerus are more commonly described based on the previously discussed anatomic description of the columnar structure of the distal humerus, which includes

Orthogonal Plating

Orthogonal plating techniques evolved after a publication by Jupiter and colleagues14 in 1985, reporting on patients having successful outcomes with ORIF of distal humerus fractures. This retrospective series looked at 39 subjects treated with ORIF of the distal humerus and found 27 subjects to have good or excellent results. They noted that the key to surgical success was obtaining enough bony stability to permit early range of motion. This stability usually required the use of two plates, one

Biomechanical analysis

The literature has had contradictory results with regard to biomechanical testing of these two techniques. Self and colleagues28 assessed the biomechanical aspects of the two techniques using reconstruction plates and found the parallel system to be stronger and stiffer. Jacobson and colleagues29 also assessed the biomechanical aspects of the techniques with reconstruction plates yet found the perpendicular system to be stronger. Both of these studies were performed on cadaveric bone.

Schwartz

Surgical techniques

ORIF should be performed in fractures with any amount of significant displacement involving the articular surface because outcomes are superior to nonsurgical treatment of these fractures. The goals of ORIF include restoration of the elbow joint anatomy with stable fixation to permit early motion.

Orthogonal Plating

Gofton and colleagues performed a retrospective review of 23 subjects treated with dual orthogonal plates at a mean follow-up of 45 months. Their results demonstrated that subjects had minimal subjective deficits (10%) with a mean overall satisfaction score of 93%. The mean DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) score at the most recent follow-up was 12, with a range from 0 to 38; whereas the mean ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons) score was 9.7, plus or minus 10.1 points.

Complications

Complications arise whether using the orthogonal plating technique or the parallel plating technique. These complications include heterotopic ossification, failure of fixation, nonunion, malunion, infection, ulnar neuropathy, and complex regional pain syndrome.

In the orthogonal plating series of 23 subjects by Gofton and colleagues, about half of the subjects experienced at least one complication, with the presence of heterotopic ossification being the most common (present in 30% of subjects).

Nonunion scenarios

Similar to the difficulties encountered treating distal humerus fractures, treatment of distal humeral nonunions has proven to be a difficult entity for the surgeon. This complication is especially devastating when elbow instability is so severe that the limb cannot be supported against gravity. Treatment of this problem can be achieved with total elbow arthroplasty, however many patients are too young or active for total elbow arthroplasty to be the optimal treatment. Therefore, some

Summary

Distal humerus fractures continue to be a complex fracture for the surgeon to treat. This article describes two techniques that can be used to tackle these difficult fractures. Both of these techniques have yielded excellent outcomes after ORIF; however, both techniques have significant complications associated with them. Use of parallel plating or orthogonal plating will depend on surgeon preference and the fracture pattern present. Orthogonal plating may be preferred in cases of an anterior

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (40)

  • M.E. Muller et al.

    Manual of internal fixation techniques recommended by the AO group

    (1979)
  • J.B. Jupiter et al.

    Fractures of the distal humerus

    Orthopedics

    (1992)
  • M. Leugmair et al.

    Surgical treatment of AO type C distal humerus fractures: internal fixation with a Y-shaped reconstruction (Lambda) plate

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (2008)
  • J.T. London

    Kinematics of the elbow

    J Bone Joint Surg

    (1981)
  • Mehne DK, Matta J. Bicolumn fractures of the adult humerus. In: Paper presented at the 53rd annual meeting of the...
  • M.D. McKee et al.

    Fractures of the distal humerus. Skeletal trauma basic science, management, and reconstruction

    (2003)
  • H. Milch

    Fractures and fracture-dislocations of the humeral condyles

    J Trauma

    (1964)
  • J. Wickstrom et al.

    Fractures of the distal humerus in adults

    Clin Orthop

    (1967)
  • R.S. Bryan et al.

    Fractures of the distal humerus

  • J.B. Jupiter et al.

    Intercondylar fracture of the humerus

    J Bone Joint Surg

    (1985)
  • Cited by (0)

    Dr Abzug is a hand surgery fellow, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, The Philadelphia Hand Center, Philadelphia, PA.

    View full text