Elsevier

Health Policy

Volume 71, Issue 2, February 2005, Pages 243-253
Health Policy

Facilitators and barriers in the implementation of the meeting centres model for people with dementia and their carers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.08.011Get rights and content

Abstract

The implementation of care innovations that have been proven effective is not matter-of-course. In this study, we traced facilitating and impeding factors in the implementation of thirteen meeting centres for people with dementia and their carers in five different regions in The Netherlands. To guide the data collection and analyses, a theoretical model was developed that distinguishes different phases of implementation, and factors at the level of characteristics of the innovation and other preconditions. Qualitative methods were used, including interviews with 23 key figures and other written materials gathered. The interview data were double coded and analyzed, using the computer programme NVivo. Several factors proved to play a facilitating role in all phases of implementation, for example: motivated people, financial resources, continuous and varied PR-activities, and cooperation between organizations. Other important facilitating characteristics of the meeting centres were: the surplus value of the integrated support programme as compared to the local support offer, and the fact that several centres were already available as an example for new initiators. The findings were used, among other things, to develop an implementation guide, to facilitate the implementation of meeting centres.

Introduction

Research showing that an innovation is effective and the people involved are satisfied with it, does not automatically imply its large-scale implementation. That takes more than writing about positive research results. The innovation will have to be implemented. Some innovations benefit from adaptive implementation [1], which takes into account the local situation, to which the innovation is tuned and, if necessary, adapted. Which are the most effective strategies in the implementation of innovations is not always or immediately clear [2], [3], [4]. Various systematic literature reviews show that the strategies that are proven effective in one study are not necessarily proven effective in another. Furthermore, the effectiveness of strategies turns out to depend on the type of innovation and the phase in the implementation process. Multiple (multi-faceted) strategies that take into account facilitators and barriers in implementation, are expected to be the most effective strategies [2], [5]. Gaining insight into facilitating and impeding factors in implementation is therefore considered an important step in the process of effective implementation.

In the study that is reported on in this article, we traced facilitating and impeding factors in the adaptive implementation of the meeting centres programme to support people with dementia and their carers. This support programme was developed in 1992–1994 [6] and it was proven effective in a controlled study in 1994–1996 [7]. The present study was part of an extensive multi-centre study into the preconditions of successful implementation of meeting centres in The Netherlands [8]. To guide the data collection and analyses, a theoretical search model was developed [9] on the basis of a survey of the literature, previous experiences with setting up meeting centres and information from experts that were consulted (see Fig. 1). With this model, we investigated which characteristics of the innovation and other preconditions either facilitated or impeded the implementation of the meeting centres, and which factors at the micro, meso and macro levels of the successive phases of the implementation process had facilitated or impeded the implementation. The results will be used to compile an implementation guide to facilitate the nationwide implementation of meeting centres and its evaluation.

Section snippets

Setting

The study was conducted in the period March 2000 to March 2003 in 13 meeting centres, located in five regions in The Netherlands. Five meeting centres were already operational at the start of the study, five centres started during the study, and three centres had been discontinued at the start of the study. The meeting centres were located mainly in community centres and centres for the elderly; other meeting centres were located in a church annex, a converted old people's flat, and in a

Characteristics of the innovation

An obvious surplus value as compared to the local support offer clearly facilitated the implementation of meeting centres. For example, the meeting centre is an addition to the care provision because it focuses on people with mild to moderately severe dementia who live at home as well as their carers. Some type of support was frequently present in a region, but the combination of the fragmented support offer for this target group was considered an improvement by key figures from home care,

Conclusion and discussion

In our study of facilitating and impeding factors in the adaptive implementation of meeting centres, we used a theoretical model [9], developed specifically for this purpose, to guide the data collection and analyses. The model distinguishes different phases of implementation, and for each phase the facilitators and barriers were investigated on the micro, meso and macro levels. In addition, characteristics of the innovation and other preconditions were examined for their facilitating and

Acknowledgments

The study received financial support from ZonMw (Dutch Health Research and Development Council), the Valerius Foundation, Association for Support of Christian Care of people with Mental and Nervous Diseases, Novartis, National Fund Elderly Support, Foundation Sluyterman Van Loo, VSB-fund, the Provinces of Groningen, Utrecht and Gelderland. The authors wish to thank all the personnel and participants of the meeting centres programme and the responsible organizations for their cooperation.

References (32)

  • R.M. Dröes et al.

    Implementatie Model Ontmoetingscentra. Een onderzoek naar de voorwaarden voor succesvolle landelijke implementatie van ontmoetingscentra voor mensen met dementie en hun verzorgers. Eindrapport. [Implementation meeting centres model; a study into the conditions for successful nationwide implementation of meeting centres for people with dementia and their carers. Final report]

    (2003)
  • R.M. Dröes et al.

    The effect of integrated family support versus day care only on behavior and mood of patients with dementia

    International Psychogeriatrics

    (2000)
  • R.M. Dröes et al.

    The Meeting Centres Support Programme: an effective way of supporting people with dementia who live at home and their carers

    Dementia International Journal of Social Research and Practice

    (2003)
  • R.M. Dröes et al.

    Effect of Meeting Centres Support Programme on feeling of competence of family caregivers and delay of institutionalization of people with dementia

    Aging Mental Health

    (2004)
  • Dröes RM, Meiland FJM, Schmitz MJ, van Tilburg W. Effect of Meeting Centres Support Programme on psychological and...
  • R.M. Dröes et al.

    Effect of combined support for people with dementia and carers versus regular day care on behaviour and mood of persons with dementia: results from a multi-centre implementation study

    International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text