Private health insurance in South Korea: An international comparison
Introduction
How to balance private–public finances to promote financial sustainability of a health care system has been a major component in many health care reforms. In particular, countries with universal coverage perceive private insurance as a complementary resource to assist public funding [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Although there is considerable cross-country variation in the way that private health insurance functions within the publicly funded system, the rationale for these countries to include a role for private health care stands firm on the common ground: private health insurance may create market incentives for providers, patients and insurers to be more concerned with cost and quality of care than would otherwise be the case [6], [7], [8], [9]. On the other hand, it is plausible that private insurance may undermine equity of access to care, which is the essential value of universal coverage. Thus, in countries with universal coverage, such as South Korea, private insurance markets operate in a heavily regulated fashion. There is, however, no solid evidence to substantiate whether private insurance involvement produces a net benefit or loss in terms of quality of care, equity, and most controversially, cost efficiency [10], [11].
The goal of this study is to examine the balance of private–public funding in health care financing, with a special focus on the South Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) system. Using the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Health Data from 2011, we empirically test the impacts of private health insurance payments on different funding sources: government spending on health care, social security contributions, and out-of-pocket payments. We further examine whether the private health insurance payment helps mitigate the burden of total health care expenditure increase. To control for country-specific heterogeneities, we apply the panel fixed-effects model with the serial correlation correction. From these empirical analyses, we aim to draw policy implications on the recent debates about the expansion of private health insurance in South Korea.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces the institutional background of the South Korean health insurance system. The historical and policy frameworks of private health insurance in South Korea are presented within the context of the South Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) program. Section 3 describes data, hypotheses and estimation methodology. Section 4 reports empirical findings and Section 5 concludes with suggestions for further studies and implications on the public–private partnership in the South Korean health care financing.
Section snippets
Institutional system of the South Korean health insurance
The primary frame of the South Korean (henceforth, Korean) health insurance system is the National Health Insurance (NHI) program. The NHI program was launched in 1963 by the Medical Insurance Act for the purpose of building up a social safety net for the health care needs of all Korean citizens. In 1977, mandatory participation in the NHI program was applied to firms with 500 or more employees, forcing firms to subsidize half of the NHI contributions for their employees. The remaining half of
Estimation methods
To evaluate possibilities of how the expansion of private health insurance may alter the shape of Korean health care financing, we used the OECD Health Data 2011, the information of thirty member countries over the period of 1980–2007. In specific, we identify four questions to be tested, as follows: whether private payers may crowd out public financing, either (1) government spending or (2) social security contributions; and whether private health insurance may help (3) counterbalance
Findings
Table 3 presents the results from the panel fixed effects estimation of the relationships between PHI and government spending on health care (GOV_HC), showing no statistically significant10
Discussion
In this study, we empirically examine the validity of arguments on the expansion of private health insurance in the Korean NHI system. Hypothetically, the expansion of private insurance may provide various benefits to the public insurer and the general population. The insufficient ranges of benefit coverage, high proportion of out-of-pocket payments, and fiscal challenges of the Korean NHI plan seem reasonable bases to favor the empowerment of private insurers.
This study, however, finds limited
Acknowledgments
I thank the Center for East Asian Studies at Stanford University for its generous support of this research. I am especially indebted to Karen N. Eggleston, Asia Health Policy Program director at the Walter H. Shorentein Asia-Pacific Research Center, Stanford University, for her insightful comments and encourgement.
References (39)
- et al.
Private and public health insurance in the UK
European Economic Review
(1998) Health services financing in Greece: a role for private health insurance
Health Policy
(1995)- et al.
Public/private financing in the Greek health care system: implications for equity
Health Policy
(1998) - et al.
An analysis of private health insurance purchasing decisions with national health insurance in Taiwan
Social Science and Medicine
(2002) - et al.
Horizontal inequities in Australia's mixed public/private health care system
Health Policy
(2008) A descriptive framework for country-level analysis of health care financing arrangements
Health Policy
(2001)Adverse selection and the purchase of Medigap insurance by the elderly
Journal of Health Economics
(1997)- et al.
Adverse selection, moral hazard and wealth effects in the Medigap insurance market
Journal of Health Economics
(1991) Private or public approaches to insuring the uninsured: lessons from international experience with private insurance
New York University Law Review
(2001)- et al.
Regulating private health insurance to serve the public interest: policy issues for developing countries
International Journal of Health Planning and Management
(2006)
Private health insurance: implications for developing countries
Bulletin of World Health Organization
Different countries, different needs: the role of private health insurance in developing countries
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Performance of Universal Health Insurance: lessons from South Korea
Journal of World Health and Population
The changing process and politics of health policy in Korea
Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law
Private health insurance system: trends and prospects
Projections on private health insurance in Korea: market size and impacts on health care financing. Research series in Health Care Management program
Discussion on the optimal coordination of national health insurance and private health insurance in Korea
Health Insurance Forum
Cited by (19)
Length of stay and readmission in lumbar intervertebral disc disorder inpatients by hospital characteristics and volumes
2016, Health PolicyCitation Excerpt :Such increases were accelerated by introduction of the National Health Insurance Service (NHIs). Although accessibility to health care has rapidly increased for South Koreans by that system, it seemed like two sides of the same coin [5]. There were explosive increases in demand for health care, and many health care providers expanded their business in order to make more profit [6].
Effect of private health insurance on health care utilization in a universal public insurance system: A case of South Korea
2013, Health PolicyCitation Excerpt :More than 77% of households purchase at least one PHI in 2009 [4] and more than 64% of individuals purchase at least one PHI in 2010 [5]. In addition to the concerns on high out-of-pocket payment in the NHI, popularity of private health insurance plans is also related to diverse benefit packages, customized plan choice [6], and attractive marketing through advertisements or door-to-door sales, etc. There have been debates on the role of PHI in Korea.
Comparison of international medical costs for interventional pain treatment: a focus on Korea and Japan
2024, Korean Journal of Pain