Focus issue: Sudden cardiac arrestClinicalSudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes
Introduction
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a common disorder in developed areas of the world. It also is considered a prominent component of the currently emerging epidemic of chronic diseases in less developed areas of the world. Worldwide prevalence is estimated to reach nearly 220 million people by the year 2010.1 In addition to its implications as a primary disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus is a powerful risk factor for other chronic diseases, most notably cardiac and vascular disease. For example, the population subset of diabetic patients has a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease, and patients with type 2 diabetes without prior evidence of coronary artery disease are at increased risk for having cardiovascular events earlier than nondiabetic patients. Type 2 diabetic patients have an increased risk for cardiovascular mortality with or without evident coronary artery disease at the time of diagnosis.2, 3, 4 A number of studies have suggested that diabetes is a risk factor for sudden cardiac death (SCD) as well as for other mechanisms of cardiac mortality,5 but data regarding fatal and nonfatal cardiac event rates among diabetic subjects without prior myocardial infarction (MI) compared to nondiabetic subjects with prior MI are conflcting.6, 7, 8 In one study, the risk of future events in type 2 diabetic patients without MI was as high as in nondiabetic patients with prior MI.6 In another study, diabetic patients without MI were at lower risk for future events.7 Neither study provided data on measures of infarct size, history of heart failure, or SCD as a specific primary or secondary endpoint.
SCD in the post-MI patient is of special interest because of the magnitude of risk, the challenge of individual risk profiling, and the potential for prevention in high-risk individuals.9 The previous observational studies comparing diabetic and nondiabetic patients with respect to death and cardiovascular morbidity after MI10, 11, 12, 13 or with respect to heart failure14 did not address the question of SCD risk. Only one of the MI studies10 and one heart failure study14 provided secondary analyses comparing SCD risk in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. A population-based observational study identified diabetes as a predictor of MI, non-SCD, and SCD, but the latter was not analyzed for SCD after MI because only 10% of the SCD cases had a prior MI.15 To our knowledge, no studies have focused on diabetes as a specific risk marker of SCD after MI. Furthermore, the duration of follow-up in prior studies of cardiovascular events in diabetic patients has been relatively short, and the majority of studies assessing the risk of cardiovascular mortality among diabetic patients were performed in 1990s, before the more recent advances in treatment of acute and chronic MI that improved the prognosis of affected patients. Because of current emphasis on the importance of identifying better clinical associations and biomarkers for SCD risk prediction, this study was designed to compare the contemporary incidence and temporal patterns of SCD in diabetic and nondiabetic patients during long-term follow-up after MI.
Section snippets
Study population
The study population consisted of enrollees in two prospective post-MI studies: the Multiple Risk Factor Analysis Trial (MRFAT) and the Improved Stratification of Autonomic Regulation for Risk Prediction postinfarction survey program (ISAR-Risk).16 The cohort consisted of a combined series of 3,276 acute MI patients (MRFAT n = 663; ISAR-Risk n = 2613) enrolled between January 1996 and January 2000 (MRFAT) and between January 2000 to March 2005 (ISAR-Risk). Part of the ISAR data was collected
Study population
Baseline characteristics of the study population, including comparisons between diabetic and nondiabetic patients, are given in Table 1. Diabetic patients were older (mean 64 ± 10 years vs 59 ± 11 years) and had a higher proportion of females (32% vs 22%), higher incidence of prior MI, higher incidence of hypertension, slightly lower LVEF (mean 49 ± 12 vs 52 ± 12), and higher incidence of three-vessel disease by angiography (42% vs 30%) compared to nondiabetic patients. However, New York Heart
Discussion
This study demonstrates a higher incidence of SCD among type 2 diabetic patients during long-term follow-up after MI compared to nondiabetic patients (5.9% vs 1.7%). Non-SCD also was higher among diabetic than nondiabetic patients (7.2% vs 2.8%). Increased risk of SCD in diabetic patients remained significant after adjustments for baseline differences between diabetic and nondiabetic patients at the time of acute MI, but the difference in non-SCD between diabetic and nondiabetic patients was
Conclusion
Patients with type 2 diabetes are at higher risk for SCD after MI than are nondiabetic patients. The incidence of SCD in post-MI type 2 diabetic patients with LVEF >35% is equal to that of nondiabetic patients with LVEF <35%. Further prospective information on post-MI diabetic patients is needed to evaluate indications for, and efficacy of, ICDs and other therapies for this higher-risk subgroup.
References (28)
- et al.
Noninvasive risk assessment early after a myocardial infarction the REFINE study
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2007) - et al.
Prediction of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction in the beta-blocking era
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2003) - et al.
Indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators based on evidence and judgment
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2009) - et al.
Risk stratification for primary implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2008) Globalization, coca-colonization and the chronic disease epidemic: can the doomsday scenario be averted?
J Intern Med
(2000)- et al.
Diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors: the Framingham study
Circulation
(1979) - et al.
Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the multiple risk factor intervention trial
Diabetes Care
(1993) - et al.
Mortality and causes of death in the WHO multinational study of vascular disease in diabetes
Diabetologia
(2001) - et al.
Type 2 diabetes and the risk of sudden cardiac arrest in the community
Rev Endocr Metab Disord
(2010) - et al.
Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction
N Engl J Med
(1998)
Comparison of cardiovascular risk between patients with type 2 diabetes and those who had had a myocardial infarction: Cross sectional and cohort studies
BMJ
Cardiovascular risk and diabetesare the methods of risk prediction satisfactory?
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators after myocardial infarction
N Engl J Med
Prediction of sudden cardiac death after acute myocardial infarction: role of Holter monitoring in the modern treatment era
Eur Heart J
Cited by (80)
Death in Coronary Artery Disease Patients With Diabetes: More Arrhythmia Risk Stratification Research Needed
2021, JACC: Clinical ElectrophysiologyDiabetes and Risk of Sudden Death in Coronary Artery Disease Patients Without Severe Systolic Dysfunction
2021, JACC: Clinical ElectrophysiologyIs IL-1 the Bridge Connecting Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiac Arrhythmias?
2021, JACC: Basic to Translational Science2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD
2020, Revista Espanola de Cardiologia
This study was supported by research grants from the following nonprofit foundations: Fondation Leducq, Paris, France, to Drs. Junttila and Myerburg; Instrumentarium Science Foundation to Dr. Junttila; Orion-Farmos Research Foundation to Dr. Junttila; Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation, Helsinki, Finland, to Drs. Mäkikallio, Tulppo, Kiviniemi, and Huikuri; Research Council for Health, Academy of Finland, Helsinki, Finland, to Dr. Kiviniemi; Florida Heart Research Foundation, Miami, Florida, to Dr. Myerburg; Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie to Dr. Schmidt; Kommission für Klinische Forschung to Dr. Schmidt; and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to Dr. Schmidt. Dr. Junttila had full access to the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
- ⁎
Equal contributions as first author.
- †
Equal contributions as senior author.