Original contributionIncidentally detected prostate cancer in cystoprostatectomies: pathological and morphometric comparison with clinically detected cancer in totally embedded specimens
Introduction
Prostate cancer is identified in 3 different settings: (1) clinically diagnosed by physical examination, laboratory tests, and/or symptoms (clinically detected cancer); (2) discovered when the prostate is removed incidentally (eg, during cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer) (incidentally detected cancer); or (3) discovered latently at autopsy without ever having caused symptoms during the person's lifetime (autopsy-detected cancer). The incidence of prostate cancer in each of these settings is different.
The lifetime risk of clinically detected prostate cancer is 9.5%, and the probability of dying from prostate cancer is 3%. The frequency of incidentally detected cancer is approximately 42% in men older than 50 years; the frequency of autopsy-detected cancer is similar or higher. Early diagnosis of lethal prostate cancer is a laudable goal, as is avoidance of unnecessary treatment, but current methods are inaccurate for making this determination. In no other malignancy is there such a vast reservoir of undetected cases that may never be clinically significant or cause death [1]; yet, we are unable to stratify significant and insignificant cancer.
Almost all clinical and morphological studies of prostate cancer have been made in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens, representing clinically detected cancer [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Currently, stage, surgical margin status, and Gleason score are the most commonly used predictors of outcome for patients with prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Removal of the prostate with the bladder during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer provides a unique opportunity to evaluate the clinical and morphological features of incidentally detected prostate cancer [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. To our knowledge, there are no previous studies that compare the morphological, morphometric, and immunohistochemical features of benign prostate, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and cancer in cystoprostatectomy and radical prostatectomy specimens; this was the aim of the current study.
Section snippets
Morphology
The study group materials were obtained from the files of the Section of Pathological Anatomy and Histopathology of the Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy. A total of 360 consecutive prostate specimens were examined between March 1997 and June 2001 and consisted of the following:
- •
One hundred thirty-two cystoprostatectomy specimens from men with urothelial carcinoma and no history or clinical evidence of prostate cancer before surgery. Mean patient age was 61 years (range,
Morphology
The majority (67%) of clinically detected cancers were pT2b and pT3a (32% and 35%, respectively) (Table 1). A total of 21% and 59% of cases had Gleason scores 6 and 7, respectively (Table 2). Positive margins were present in 52% of specimens, and regional lymph node metastases were present in 2% of cases.
Incidentally detected prostate cancer was present in 42% of cystoprostatectomy specimens. The majority (60%) was pT2a and 28% pT2b, with lower frequency in other pT categories (8% pT3a, 3%
Discussion
We found that 42% of totally sampled cystoprostatectomy specimens with bladder cancer also contained incidental prostate cancer. This result was identical to the overall mean frequency of incidentally detected prostate cancer in other series of cystoprostatectomy cases (range, 23%-68%) [1], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24] and similar to or slightly lower than the age-adjusted frequency of autopsy-detected prostate cancer (mean
Acknowledgments
This report was supported by grants from the Polytechnic University of the Marche Region (Ancona) Italy (M. S.) and the Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research (R. M., 2003). The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Polytechnic University of the Marche Region (Ancona, Italy).
References (41)
- et al.
Architectural patterns of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
Hum Pathol
(1993) - et al.
Occult prostatic carcinoma diagnosed by the step-section technique of the surgical specimen
J Urol
(1965) - et al.
Simultaneous presentation of adenocarcinoma of prostate and transitional cell carcinoma of bladder
Urology
(1991) - et al.
Unsuspected prostatic adenocarcinoma in patients who have undergone radical cystoprostatectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder
J Urol
(1988) - et al.
Coexisting adenocarcinoma of the prostate in patients undergoing cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer
Urology
(1987) - et al.
The frequency of carcinoma and intraepithelial neoplasia of prostate in young male patients
J Urol
(1993) - et al.
Carcinoma of the prostate in elderly men: incidence, growth characteristics and clinical significance
J Urol
(1969) - et al.
Neoplastic and borderline lesions of the prostate: an autopsy study and epidemiological data
Pathol Res Pract
(1995) - et al.
Henke radical prostatectomy. Significance of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in needle biopsy specimens
Urology
(2001) - et al.
The extent and multicentricity of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in clinically localized prostatic adenocarcinoma
Hum Pathol
(1997)
Digital image analysis of proliferative index: two distinct population of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in close proximity to the adenocarcinoma of the prostate
Hum Pathol
Risk of concurrent prostate cancer in cystoprostatectomy specimens is related to volume of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
Urol
Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer
Cancer
Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
Curr Urol Rep
Diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
Scand J Urol Nephrol
Morphological identification of the patterns of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and their importance
J Clin Pathol
Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer
Panminerva Med
Precancerous lesions and conditions of the prostate: from morphological and biological characterization to chemoprevention
Ann N Y Acad Sci
Incidental prostate cancer: the importance of complete prostatic removal at cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer
Urol Int
Incidental prostatic adenocarcinoma in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer
Eur Urol
Cited by (65)
Neoplasms of the Prostate
2020, Urologic Surgical PathologyBasic optical scattering parameter of the brain and prostate tissues in the spectral range of 400-2400 nm
2018, Neurophotonics and Biomedical SpectroscopyIncidental prostate cancer diagnosed at radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer: disease-specific outcomes and survival
2016, Prostate InternationalCitation Excerpt :Autopsy series have confirmed high rates of incidental prostate cancers, with the majority of men having survived without formal diagnosis of malignancy.6 Specific to patients undergoing RCP, the reported rates of incidental prostate cancers are 14–50%,3,7–11 which aligns well with our own experience (34%). Likely, differences in pathologic processing technique play a role in the variable reported incidence, with more meticulous sampling (e.g., 2–3 mm step-sectioning of whole-mount specimen) responsible for increased detection.12
Basal cell hyperplasia (BCH) versus high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in tiny prostatic needle biopsies: Unusual diagnostic dilemma
2014, Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer InstituteCitation Excerpt :The same findings were mentioned in a previous report [5] emphasizing that PIN is an accidental microscopic finding below the detection threshold by transrectal ultrasound. Both conditions do not elevate PSA level; it ranges from 1.0 to 2.5 ng/ml in BCH [17] which is considered a normal range. Similar findings were detected in the current study (1.3–2.7 ng/ml).