Original contributionIdentification of a basal-like subtype of breast ductal carcinoma in situ☆
Introduction
DNA microarray profiling studies on invasive breast tumors show distinct and reproducible subtypes of breast carcinoma associated with different clinical outcomes [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. These subtypes include at least 2 types of estrogen receptor (ER)–negative tumors (basal-like and HER2+/ER−) and at least 2 types of ER+ tumors (luminal A and luminal B) [2], [3]. The basal-like subtype is typically HER2− (ie, not amplified) and shows some characteristics of breast myoepithelial cells [11]. The basal-like subtype has been shown to have the highest proliferation rates and poor clinical outcomes [2], [3] and has also been described as the prevalent subtype in BRCA1-related breast carcinomas [12].
Studies have used basal/myoepithelial cytokeratins and other markers to identify a subset of ER- and HER2− breast carcinomas that are associated with a poor prognosis, providing further evidence that basal-like breast cancer represents a distinct subtype of invasive carcinoma [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. An association between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression and the basal-like phenotype has been demonstrated [16]. Breast cancers showing immunoreactivity for cytokeratin 5/6 were also frequently found to coexpress EGFR. Nielsen et al [11] proposed a panel of four antibodies (ER, EGFR, HER2, and cytokeratin 5/6) to identify basal-like tumors in which the basal-like tumors were identified as those being ER−, HER2 not amplified, and positive for expression of cytokeratin 5/6 and/or EGFR.
Little is known with regard to the development of basal-like breast tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) cases from a large population-based series of incident cases to determine if a basal-like DCIS subtype exists and, if so, to determine the prevalence of this subtype and its correlations with histologic features and other immunohistochemical markers.
Section snippets
Study participants
The Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS) is a population-based, case-control study of invasive and in situ breast cancer conducted in 24 counties of central and eastern North Carolina [19]. Incident cases were identified using a Rapid Case Ascertainment System, in cooperation with the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry [20]. Controls were selected from Division of Motor Vehicles (women younger than 65 years) and United States Health Care Financing Administration lists (women 65 years or
Results
Characteristics of the 245 pure DCIS cases with sufficient tumor tissue were as follows: African American (n = 57, 23%), non–African American (n = 188, 77%); premenopausal (n = 71, 29%), and postmenopausal (n = 174, 71%). Approximately 30% of DCIS cases were negative for ER, and approximately 25% of DCIS cases were positive for HER2/neu overexpression.
The prevalence of the breast cancer subtypes in the 245 DCIS patients is presented in Table 2. A basal-like immunophenotype (ER−, HER2−, and
Discussion
The designation of a molecular subtype of invasive breast carcinomas as basal-like was based on the finding that the gene expression patterns between these tumors and normal breast basal (myoepithelial) cells showed some similarities that included the expression of keratins 5, 6, and 17 [1], [2], [3]. Numerous studies have since confirmed the presence of a group of ER− invasive breast tumors that express basal cytokeratins and are associated with poor prognosis [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Elaine McSherry for her critical review.
References (31)
- et al.
A two-gene expression ratio predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen
Cancer Cell
(2004) - et al.
Gene expression predictors of breast cancer outcomes
Lancet
(2003) - et al.
Expression of cytokeratins 17 and 5 identifies a group of breast carcinomas with poor clinical outcome
Am J Pathol
(2002) - et al.
Myoepithelial markers are expressed in at least 29% of oestrogen receptor negative invasive breast carcinoma
Mod Pathol
(2004) - et al.
Cytogenetic alterations and cytokeratin expression patterns in breast cancer: integrating a new model of breast differentiation into cytogenetic pathways of breast carcinogenesis
Lab Invest
(2002) - et al.
Myoepithelial differentiation in high-grade invasive ductal carcinomas with large central acellular zones
Hum Pathol
(1999) - et al.
Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma
Mod Pathol
(2006) - et al.
Ductal carcinoma in situ with a basal-like phenotype: a possible precursor to invasive basal-like breast cancer
Mod Pathol
(2006) - et al.
Molecular portraits of human breast tumours
Nature
(2000) - et al.
Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
(2001)
Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Gene expression profiles derived from fine needle aspiration correlate with response to systemic chemotherapy in breast cancer
Breast Cancer Res
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
Nature
A gene expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer
N Engl J Med
Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population based study
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Cited by (175)
Encapsulation for breast cancer treatment
2023, Principles of Biomaterials Encapsulation: Volume 2Who dictates and when: Genetic and epigenetic dictatorships in breast cancer response and resistance to therapy
2023, Transcription and Translation in Health and DiseaseIs it possible to predict underestimation in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast? Yes, using a simple score!
2019, European Journal of Surgical OncologySynthetic cannabinoids nano-micelles for the management of triple negative breast cancer
2018, Journal of Controlled ReleaseCitation Excerpt :These tumors are heterogeneous in their responses to treatment, and the therapeutic outcome for each patient remains challenging to predict [2]. Breast cancers are comprised of 20 major histopathological types and 18 minor subtypes associated to 5 intrinsic molecular profiles namely luminal A and B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched, basal-like, and normal-like breast cancer [3–5]. In addition, the understanding of the genetic and proteomic complexity of breast cancers has largely improved in recent years.
Downregulation of Rap1Gap: A Switch from DCIS to Invasive Breast Carcinoma via ERK/MAPK Activation
2018, Neoplasia (United States)
- ☆
This work was supported by an award to the University of North Carolina for a Breast Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) from the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (CA58223), by the NCI (RO1-CA-101227-01) to C.M.P., and by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, New York, NY.