Original contributionWhole slide imaging diagnostic concordance with light microscopy for breast needle biopsies☆,☆☆,★
Introduction
The US Food and Drug Administration has determined that whole slide imaging (WSI) instruments will be regulated as class III medical devices [1], [2]. The validation parameters used by commercial entities to obtain clearance are under consideration. This study investigated the diagnostic concordance rates of breast needle biopsy diagnosis when WSI was used as the primary diagnostic device in comparison with light microscopy (LM). Second, preliminary data were collected to determine whether the image capture resolution and viewing monitor characteristics used in this study affected diagnostic concordance rates between WSI and LM.
Although the diagnostic accuracy of traditional telepathology systems is well established [3], [4], [5], WSI represents the evolution of telepathology for remote histopathology diagnostics [6]. Evidence supporting the equivalence of WSI to LM as a primary diagnostic tool is mounting, and multiple studies supporting WSI for general surgical pathology usage have been published [7], [8], [9]. WSI has been evaluated for specialty surgical pathology applications including prostate [10], gastrointestinal [11], [12], and dermatopathology specimens [13], [14], [15]. The studies, in general, followed the College of American Pathologists (CAP) recommendations for validation of specific WSI uses [16]. WSI has been demonstrated to assist rapid diagnostic consultation in women’s health clinics [17], but there are limited data supporting the use of WSI for primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies. This study investigated the use of WSI for primary diagnostic interpretation of breast tissue obtained by needle biopsy. Two factors have been identified that could impact the overall accuracy of WSI including the scanning image magnification and the use of monitors of variable levels of quality. A previous WSI validation study by Campbell et al [7] noted that when slides were imaged at a magnification of ×20, interpretation of intranuclear detail was difficult, and microorganism detection was challenging.
There is a paucity of research investigating the optimal image capture resolution or monitor viewing characteristics used for pathologist interpretation of WSI. Although researchers agree that glass slide quality [18], spatial resolution of images [19], camera optical lens quality [20], and color standardization [21] are important factors affecting WSI, no definitive specifications have been established to determine guidelines and parameters for WSI use for primary diagnosis. For WSI to be adopted and used for primary diagnoses, the issues of image quality and optimal system performance in terms of their impact on diagnostic accuracy must be addressed.
The American College of Radiology (ACR) has published documentation and research supporting their guidelines for image management and viewing of images for diagnostic purposes [22]. The consideration and pathway established by the ACR for validation of digital imaging technologies were used to design a multistep study to determine diagnostic accuracy of WSI and investigate the effect of image resolution and monitor characteristics on diagnostic concordance and accuracy of diagnoses rendered by WSI [23].
Section snippets
Materials and methods
A computer review of the anatomical pathology laboratory information system was used to identify 85 breast needle biopsy cases (ie, stereotactic, needle core, and vacuum-assisted needle core) originally interpreted and reported by a single, board-certified pathologist who serves as the senior breast subspecialty expert for the department [24]. Seventy-eight cases consisted of one part, and 7 cases consisted of 2 parts comprising a total of 786 hematoxylin and eosin slides [25]. Based on the
Results
Complete concordance between WSI and the original LM diagnoses was reached in 113 (31%) diagnoses. Discordant opinions were reported from 12 (3%) diagnoses involving 9 cases. The remaining 243 (66%) of the diagnoses were scored as concordant with clinically insignificant differences. When the 2 concordant categories were grouped together, overall concordance rates were 97.1% (95% CI: 94.3%-98.5%) as shown in Table 2. No significant difference between concordance rates by pathologist was noted.
Discussion
The application of digital imaging to the practice of radiology required a complete evaluation of the technology including hardware, software, and operator capability. Many similarities exist for digital pathology including the impact of computer monitor quality and image production on the accuracy of diagnose and viewing monitor quality on diagnostic accuracy of WSI, LM diagnoses were compared with WSI diagnoses rendered using different image capture resolutions and different monitor quality
References (37)
- et al.
Robotic surgical telepathology between the Iron Mountain and Milwaukee Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers: a 12-year experience
Hum Pathol
(2009) - et al.
Telepathology overview: from concept to implementation
Hum Pathol
(2001) - et al.
Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future
Hum Pathol
(2009) - et al.
Concordance between whole-slide imaging and light microscopy for routine surgical pathology
Hum Pathol
(2012) - et al.
Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in digital and routine microscopic assessment of prostate needle biopsies
Hum Pathol
(2011) - et al.
Whole slide images for primary diagnostics of gastrointestinal tract pathology: a feasibility study
Hum Pathol
(2012) - et al.
Randomized comparison of virtual microscopy and traditional glass microscopy in diagnostic accuracy among dermatology and pathology residents
Hum Pathol
(2009) - et al.
Evaluation of 2 whole-slide imaging applications in dermatopathology
Hum Pathol
(2008) - et al.
Virtual slide telepathology enables an innovative telehealth rapid breast care clinic
Hum Pathol
(2009) - et al.
Spatial resolution requirements for acquisition of the virtual screening slide for digital whole-specimen breast histopathology
Hum Pathol
(2007)
Reproducibility of three classification systems of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using a web-based survey
Pathol Res Pract
Atypical ductal hyperplasia: interobserver and intraobserver variability
Mod Pathol
Telepathology diagnosis by means of digital still images: an international validation study
Hum Pathol
FDA regulation of whole slide imaging (WSI) devices: current thoughts
Regulators scanning the digital scanners
CAP Today
Routine surgical telepathology in the department of veterans affairs: experience-related improvements in pathologist performance in 2200 cases
Telemed J
Validation of whole slide imaging for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology
Arch Pathol Lab Med
Clinical examination and validation of primary diagnosis in anatomic pathology using whole slide digital images
Arch Pathol Lab Med
Cited by (47)
WSI validation studies in breast and gynecological pathology
2022, Pathology Research and PracticeCitation Excerpt :In two studies from the same research group, 252 expert pathologists were recruited, of which only 82 completed the evaluation of the same cases via GS and digital format [20,21]. In three studies the observers had access to additional patient information, simulating the routine diagnostic process [13,19,22]. In four studies slide reading was performed blinded [15,16,23,24].
Integrating digital pathology into clinical practice
2022, Modern PathologySuboptimal reliability of liver biopsy evaluation has implications for randomized clinical trials
2020, Journal of HepatologyCitation Excerpt :Digitized slide images rather than glass slides were read which could have reduced the estimated reliability. While studies suggest that the primary diagnosis derived from whole slide imaging (WSI) agrees quite well with that derived from microscopy in surgical pathology across multiple organ systems,46–49 and in needle liver biopsies specifically,50 WSI has not been explicitly validated using the semi-quantitative scoring system employed here and a comparison between readings of digitized slide images and glass slides was not performed in the current study. The analysis is further limited by the specific expert histopathologists who read the biopsies.
The future of pathology is digital
2020, Pathology Research and PracticeCitation Excerpt :The “virtual” microscope simply replaces the conventional microscope. Both methods have been compared in serval studies [3,9,38,53,54], indicating that WSI can be considered as an equivalent to the conventional microscope and as a gold standard. As a consequence, WSIs facilitate remote primary diagnosis, teleconsultation, improved workload efficiency and balancing, collaborations with sub-specialists, and allows central clinical trial reviews, development of artificial image analyses, practical education, and lead to other innovative research perspectives [27,47].
Digital pathology as a platform for primary diagnosis and augmentation via deep learning
2020, Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning in Pathology
- ☆
Competing interests: At the time the work described in this manuscript was performed, Ventana Medical Systems (Tucson, AZ) was a research collaborator with the Department of Pathology and Microbiology.
- ☆☆
Funding/Support: No monetary assistance was provided by Ventana to the department or any project participant.
- ★
Elements of the data used in this manuscript were included as part of the principal author’s doctoral thesis.