The Epidemiology of Asthma During Pregnancy: Prevalence, Diagnosis, and Symptoms

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iac.2005.11.002Get rights and content

Section snippets

Data sources

The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is a cross-sectional survey, which is planned and conducted in conjunction with the U.S. Bureau of the Census. Since its inception in 1957, the NHIS has been the primary source of general health information on the civilian, noninstitutionalized population of the United States, and the primary source of asthma prevalence data in the nonpregnant population of the United States [6]. A 1997 survey redesign added questions about asthma that inquired

How valid are survey data on asthma prevalence?

Survey prevalence data are heavily dependent on the diagnosis of asthma by a doctor or health professional (see Table 1). Other studies that use chart review, administrative databases, or medical records also frequently depend on clinical diagnoses and other information that requires an encounter with the health care system. We are unaware of specific studies that examined diagnostic validity in pregnant women; however, it is likely that issues in diagnosing asthma in nonpregnant women are

Symptoms and medication use

If asthma diagnoses have uncertain validity, is it possible to study asthma symptoms and asthma medication use, and what is the relationship between diagnosis, symptoms, and medication? Epidemiologic data on asthmatic pregnant women is sparse; many studies provide information only on the diagnosis of asthma, rather than on the frequency of symptoms and medication use related to asthma. In this section, we describe data from the women who had physician-diagnosed asthma from our cohort study that

Summary

We demonstrated that asthma remains a common condition among pregnant women and that the prevalence of self-reported asthma in the United States is between 8.4% and 8.8%. In addition, approximately 4.1% of all pregnant women experienced an asthma attack in the previous year. Prevalence rates in other countries seem to be higher or substantially lower; however, further characterization of international trends using nationally representative data is needed. Data from a large prospective cohort

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (36)

  • D.M. Mannino et al.

    Surveillance of asthma—United States, 1960–1995

    MMWR CDC Surveill Summ

    (1998)
  • Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995–2004. Vital and Health Statistics

    (2000)
  • Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Vital Health Statistics

    (1994)
  • A. McDowell et al.

    Plan and operation of the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1976–1980. Vital Health Statistics

    (1981)
  • Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System user's guide

    (1998)
  • Self-reported asthma prevalence among adults—United States, 2000

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2001)
  • 2003 Behavioral risk factor surveillance summary data quality report

    (2004)
  • J.J. Kurinczuk et al.

    The relationship between asthma and smoking during pregnancy

    Women Health

    (1999)
  • Cited by (136)

    • Acute Respiratory Failure in Pregnancy

      2024, Critical Care Clinics
    • Chronic Management of Asthma During Pregnancy

      2023, Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported with grants AI41040 and DA05484 from the National Institutes of Health and the Kellogg Scholars in Health Disparities Program.

    View full text