Review
Potentially multidrug-resistant non-fermentative Gram-negative pathogens causing nosocomial pneumonia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.11.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Owing to its high morbidity and mortality, nosocomial pneumonia represents a particularly serious illness and one of the most frequent complications in ventilated patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. Gram-negative microorganisms, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, are the most relevant pathogens responsible for particularly difficult-to-treat nosocomial pneumonia. The intrinsic resistance of these bacteria to many antimicrobial agents and, in addition, the variety of their increasingly recognised acquired resistance mechanisms make their management in the hospital setting problematic. Antimicrobials that retain the best activity against P. aeruginosa include carbapenems, piperacillin, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin and certain aminoglycosides, whilst carbapenems and sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim remain the most active agents against A. baumannii and S. maltophilia, respectively. However, the growing emergence among these microorganisms of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates and the severity of associated infections call for potential alternative drugs. Sulbactam alone or in combination with ampicillin may represent an acceptable option for MDR A. baumannii as well as colistin, which also covers MDR P. aeruginosa. Newer fluoroquinolones and some tetracyclines may be alternative drugs both for MDR S. maltophilia and A. baumannii. However, large-scale controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm these promising therapeutic options.

Introduction

Nosocomial pneumonia, defined as pneumonia occurring ≥48 h after hospital admission and excluding any infection that is incubating at the time of admission, remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality especially in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) [1]. Crude mortality rates range from 20% to 70% depending on the population and clinical setting studied [2], [3], [4]. Nosocomial pneumonia may occur both in mechanically-ventilated and in non-ventilated patients, but ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) represents the most important subset [5]. In accordance with the American Thoracic Society guidelines, early onset and late onset pneumonia usually occur within the first 5 days or more than 5 days after hospital admission, respectively, and depict two subgroups with well established differences in epidemiology, risk factors and prognosis [1]. The starting point for defining the concept of early onset VAP is, however, controversial; hospital admission time or intubation time are all possible crucial factors, although from the treatment and prognosis perspective the factor ‘previous days of hospitalisation’ appears more important than ‘previous days of ventilation’ [6], [7]. Subject to much controversy is also the cut-off time differentiating early and late onset VAP [8], [9].

The aetiology of nosocomial pneumonia varies from institution to institution and by the kind of patients admitted; however, the spectrum of potential pathogens can be defined by the assessment of various factors, including the severity of the pneumonia itself (mild to moderate or severe nosocomial pneumonia), the presence of specific risk factors, prior antimicrobial regimen, length of hospitalisation and the time point of occurrence of pneumonia [1], [5], [8]. Community-acquired pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and non-highly resistant enteric Gram-negative bacilli are generally the principal organisms of early onset pneumonia; conversely, classical nosocomial pathogens such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp. and, less frequently, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are traditionally associated with late onset pneumonia [1], [10]. The intrinsic resistance of these microorganisms to multiple classes of antimicrobials and their ability to acquire adaptive resistance during therapy make the management of pneumonia due to these pathogens particularly problematic. Appropriate and timely antimicrobial treatment is crucial to improve outcome and to reduce the patient mortality rate [11]. Guidelines for initial antibiotic treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia can help physicians in therapeutic decision-making [1], [5], [11]. However, guidelines need to be constantly updated on new available antimicrobials as well as on local patterns of antimicrobial resistance, since a continuous shift towards more resistant bacteria has been reported for several decades, becoming even more alarming in pathogens responsible for nosocomial infections [12], [13], [14]. The aim of this article is to analyse some aspects of potentially multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms such as P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and S. maltophilia, focusing on their mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance and on opportunities for optimal treatment of nosocomial pneumonia due to such difficult pathogens.

Section snippets

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic human pathogen that represents one of the most prevalent causes of nosocomial infections in the world [12]. Surveillance data from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) from 1990 to 1999 showed that this organism accounts for 17% of the total number of pulmonary infections, representing the second most common cause of nosocomial pneumonia and the leading cause of VAP in ICUs (13–43%) [15]. Pneumonia due to P. aeruginosa is frequent in

Conclusion

Non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli such as P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and S. maltophilia have increasingly emerged during the past few decades as important opportunistic pathogens involved in serious hospital-acquired infections and their role has become even more significant in nosocomial pneumonias developing in compromised hospital patients, especially in those confined to ICUs. Specific risk factors as well as intrinsic factors linked to each hospital or ICU may predispose patients to

References (128)

  • K. Poole

    Efflux-mediated multiresistance in Gram-negative bacteria

    Clin Microbiol Infect

    (2004)
  • G.G. Zhanel et al.

    Role of efflux mechanisms on fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    Int J Antimicrob Agents

    (2004)
  • P.J. Turner et al.

    The activity of meropenem and comparators against Acinetobacter strains isolated from European hospitals, 1997–2000

    Clin Microbiol Infect

    (2003)
  • E. Savov et al.

    In vitro investigation of the susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated from clinical specimens to ampicillin–sulbactam alone and in combination with amikacin

    Int J Antimicrob Agents

    (2002)
  • H.S. Sader et al.

    Comprehensive in vitro evaluation of cefepime combined with aztreonam or ampicillin/sulbactam against multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp

    Int J Antimicrob Agents

    (2005)
  • F.D. Wang et al.

    In vitro activities of beta-lactam antibiotics alone and in combination with sulbactam against Gram-negative bacteria

    Int J Antimicrob Agents

    (2004)
  • A.S. Levin et al.

    Severe nosocomial infections with imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii treated with ampicillin/sulbactam

    Int J Antimicrob Agents

    (2003)
  • E. Senol

    Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: the significance and role as a nosocomial pathogen

    J Hosp Infect

    (2004)
  • R. Gopalakrishnan et al.

    Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection and colonization in the intensive care units of two community hospitals: a study of 143 patients

    Heart Lung

    (1999)
  • J. Fujita et al.

    Clinical features of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia pneumonia in immunocompromised patients

    Respir Med

    (1996)
  • Hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults: diagnosis, assessment of severity, initial antimicrobial therapy, and preventive...
  • R. Ferrer et al.

    Clinical review: non-antibiotic strategies for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia

    Crit Care

    (2002)
  • J. Chastre et al.

    Ventilator-associated pneumonia

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2002)
  • R.M. Metha et al.

    Nosocomial pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit: controversies and dilemmas

    J Intensive Care Med

    (2003)
  • A. De Roux et al.

    Antibiotic treatment for nosocomial pneumonia

    Eur Respir Monograph

    (2004)
  • J.L. Trouillet et al.

    Ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by potentially drug-resistant bacteria

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (1998)
  • M. Emmerson

    Antibiotic usage and prescribing policies in the intensive care unit

    Intensive Care Med

    (2000)
  • S. Fiel

    Guidelines and critical pathways for severe hospital-acquired pneumonia

    Chest

    (2001)
  • J. Chastre et al.

    Problem pathogens (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter)

    Semin Respir Infect

    (2000)
  • N.M. Clark et al.

    Antimicrobial resistance among Gram-negative organisms in the intensive care unit

    Curr Opin Crit Care

    (2003)
  • R. Canton et al.

    Multi-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: from epidemics to endemics

    Curr Opin Infect Dis

    (2003)
  • National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, data summary from January 1990–May 1999, issued June...
  • A. Sandiumenge et al.

    Therapy of ventilator-associated pneumonia. A patient-based approach based on the ten rules of ‘The Tarragona Strategy’

    Intensive Care Med

    (2003)
  • J.L. Trouillet et al.

    Multiresistant pseudomonal respiratory infection in Intensive Care Unit patients

    Clin Pulm Med

    (2005)
  • W.G. Johanson et al.

    Nosocomial pneumonia

    Intensive Care Med

    (2003)
  • M.S. Niederman

    Gram-negative colonization of the respiratory tract: pathogenesis and clinical consequences

    Semin Respir Infect

    (1990)
  • R.M. Mehta et al.

    Nosocomial pneumonia

    Curr Opin Infect Dis

    (2002)
  • A.C. Gales et al.

    Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates: occurrence rates, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and molecular typing in the Global SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997–1999

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2001)
  • P.R. Rhonberg et al.

    Results from the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Programme: report of the 2001 data from 15 United States medical centres

    Int J Antimicrob Agents

    (2004)
  • F.J. Schmitz et al.

    Prevalence of aminoglycoside resistance in 20 European university hospitals participating in the European SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme

    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

    (1999)
  • I. Friedland et al.

    Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: data from a multicenter Intensive Care Unit Surveillance Study (ISS) in the United States

    J Chemother

    (2004)
  • M.D. Obritsch et al.

    National surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from intensive care unit patients from 1993 to 2002

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2004)
  • D.M. Livermore

    Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Our worst nightmare?

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2002)
  • J.A. Karlowsky et al.

    Stable antimicrobial susceptibility rates for clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the 2001–2003 tracking resistance in the United States today surveillance studies

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2005)
  • D. Banerjee et al.

    The treatment of respiratory pseudomonas infection in cystic fibrosis: what drug and which way?

    Drugs

    (2000)
  • E.J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis et al.

    In vitro interaction of colistin and rifampin on multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    J Chemother

    (2003)
  • C. Tascini et al.

    Microbiological activity and clinical efficacy of a colistin and rifampin combination in multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections

    J Chemother

    (2004)
  • G.F. Weldhagen et al.

    Ambler class A extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: novel developments and clinical impact

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2003)
  • M.P. Mingeot-Leclercq et al.

    Aminoglycosides: activity and resistance

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (1999)
  • M.L. Riccio et al.

    Novel 3-N-aminoglycoside acetyltransferase gene, aac(3)-Ic, from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa integron

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2003)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Daptomycin as adjunctive treatment for experimental infection by Acinetobacter baumannii with resistance to colistin

      2019, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
      Citation Excerpt :

      Acinetobacter spp. have become one of the most common aetiologies of hospital-acquired infections, causing ventilator-associated pneumonia, skin and wound infections, bacteraemia and urinary tract infections [1].

    • Inhibitory effect of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lb. fermentum isolated from the faeces of healthy infants against nonfermentative bacteria causing nosocomial infections

      2017, New Microbes and New Infections
      Citation Excerpt :

      Infections such as surgical wound, respiratory, bloodstream and urinary tract infections are the most common types of nosocomial infections that occur in hospital settings [4]. Nonfermentative bacteria such as Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa play an important role in causing nosocomial infections [5]. Probiotics are microorganisms that are believed to provide health benefits for the digestive system when consumed [6].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text