Dosing of caspofungin based on a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index for the treatment of invasive fungal infections in critically ill patients on continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.05.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A population PK model was developed for caspofungin in ICU patients.

  • Simulations of different dosage regimens were performed.

  • Suboptimal concentrations are achieved with licensed regimen in ICU patients.

  • Probabilities of target attainment with increasing doses were estimated.

Abstract

Introduction

The study objective was to evaluate the efficacy of different dosages of caspofungin in the treatment of invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis, in relation to the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment, using modelling and Monte Carlo simulations in critically ill adult patients on continuous haemodiafiltration.

Methods

Critically ill adult patients on continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration treated with caspofungin were analysed. A population PK model was developed. Four caspofungin dosing regimens were simulated: the licensed regimen, 70 mg/day, 100 mg/day or 200 mg/day. A PK/PD target was defined as the ratio between the area under the caspofungin concentration-time curve over 24 hours and the minimal inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) for candidiasis or the minimal effective concentrations (AUC/MEC) for Aspergillus spp. Target attainment based on preclinical target for Candida and Aspergillus was assessed for different MIC or MEC, respectively.

Results

Concentration-time data were described by a two-compartment model. Body–weight and protein concentration were the only covariates identified by the model. Goodness-of-fit plots and bootstrap analysis proved the model had a satisfactory performance. As expected, a higher maintenance dose resulted in a higher exposure. Target attainment was >90% for candidiasis (MIC≤0.06 mg/L) and aspergillosis (MEC≤0.5 mg/L), irrespective of the dosing regimen, but not for C. parapsilosis. Standard regimen was insufficient to reach the target for C. albicans and C. parapsilosis with MIC≥0.1 mg/L.

Conclusion

The licensed regimen of caspofungin is insufficient to achieve the PK/PD targets in critically ill patients on haemodiafiltration. The determination of MICs will enable dose scheme selection.

Introduction

Caspofungin is an echinocandin licensed for both invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis treatment in adult and paediatric patients who are refractory or intolerant to amphotericin B, lipid formulations of amphotericin B or itraconazole, and as empirical therapy of presumed fungal infections in febrile, neutropenic patients. In the critical care setting, current guidelines recommend all three echinocandins (anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin) as first–line treatment of invasive candidiasis [1], [2].

Dosing is based on body weight. A loading dose of 70 mg followed by a daily maintenance dose of 50 mg or 70 mg is recommended in patients with body weight up to 80 kg, or greater than 80 kg, respectively. No dose adjustment is needed in case of renal impairment [3]. Adequate dosing in special populations, such as patients with co-morbidities or renal insufficiency or critically ill patients, is of crucial importance to prevent suboptimal outcomes and to avert the emergence of resistance [4], [5]. For these reasons, researchers have recently investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of echinocandins in these populations [6], [7]. Although echinocandins exhibit some similarities in their PK profiles, limited data have been published on caspofungin PK during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and regarding the impact of dosing schedule variations under these circumstances [8]. Drug removal in critically ill patients receiving CRRT is complex, with multiple variables affecting clearance. Weiler et al. investigated the influence of haemofiltration and haemodialysis on the PK of caspofungin in critically ill patients [9]. In this non-compartmental analysis, caspofungin exposure in patients on CRRT was comparable to exposure in control patients, and the standard dosage was concluded to be probably adequate for patients on CRRT [9]. Recently, Aguilar et al. reported similar findings in critically ill patients on haemodiafiltration [10].

Survival rates in patients with invasive aspergillosis treated with echinocandins ranged from 50% to 67% and in patients with invasive candidiasis ranged from 66% to 90% [11]. Preclinical and limited clinical data support the concept of escalating doses of caspofungin with preservation of its safety profile [12], [13]. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study results have demonstrated concentration-dependent killing of echinocandins [14]. Thus, antifungal dosage could be optimized based on PK/PD properties. A PK/PD target in humans has not yet been established, but, interestingly, caspofungin has been associated with a 1 log kill/24 h in a neutropenic mouse model of disseminated candidiasis, when the area under the caspofungin concentration-time curve over 24 hours-minimal inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC/MIC) was between 450 and 1185 [15]. On the other hand, caspofungin shows a fungistatic action against moulds and it is difficult to establish an MIC at which Aspergillus spp. is inhibited. Some authors indicated that the minimal effective concentration (MEC) rather than the MIC is a better indicator to determine the activity of caspofungin against moulds [16]. A maximum concentration-MEC (Cmax/MEC) ratio of 10-20 has been proposed as a good predictor of caspofungin efficacy in invasive aspergillosis [14].

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different dosages of caspofungin in the treatment of invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis, in relation to the probability of PK/PD target attainment, using modelling and Monte Carlo simulations in critically ill adult patients on continuous haemodiafiltration.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

Serum concentration data obtained from a previously reported study were analysed [10]. The study was performed in 12 critically ill adult (>18 years) patients with suspected or proven invasive candidiasis and anuric renal failure, who were receiving continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). Caspofungin was administered according to the drug label. Blood samples were collected on day 3 or later (at steady state) from the arterial venous line of extracorporeal circuit. Samples were

Results

Characteristics of the cohort employed for model development (n = 12) and of the cohort used to perform the simulations (n = 24) are summarized in Table 1. No statistically significant differences were found between these two populations (P > 0.05, U Mann-Whitney test).

A two-compartment model best described concentration-time data for caspofungin. The inclusion of body weight in the model as a scaling factor on central volume of distribution (Vc) improved parameter estimation precision. This

Discussion

This study reports a population PK model for caspofungin treatment on critically ill patients undergoing haemodiafiltration and tests higher dosing schemes through simulation.

Different studies have indicated that the PK of echinocandins is not affected by other renal replacement therapies (such as CRRT) and that no dose adjustment is expected to be necessary in patients undergoing haemodiafiltration [8], [20]. Nevertheless, critically ill patients represent a population with special PK

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study reveals that the currently recommended dosage of caspofungin is insufficient to achieve the target concentration in critically ill patients on CVVHDF. With increasing MIC (0.25 mg/L) for C. glabrata and C. albicans or MEC (1 mg/L) for Aspergillus spp., only a quarter of the simulated patients achieved the given PK/PD target, which puts three–quarters of the patients at risk of therapeutic failure with standard dosing. The determination of MIC and dose escalation to 100

Declarations

Funding: None.

Competing interests: G.A. received funds for speaking at meetings organized on behalf of Astellas, Gilead, Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) and Pfizer, as well as research grants from Astellas, MSD and Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval: Not required, published data.

References (36)

  • F. Gonzalez de Molina et al.

    Treatment with echinocandins during continuous renal replacement therapy

    Crit Care

    (2014)
  • S. Weiler et al.

    Pharmacokinetics of caspofungin in critically ill patients on continuous renal replacement therapy

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2013)
  • G. Aguilar et al.

    Optimal doses of caspofungin during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration in critically ill patients

    Crit Care

    (2017)
  • D.R. Andes et al.

    Impact of treatment strategy on outcomes in patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: a patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2012)
  • O.A. Cornely et al.

    Phase II dose escalation study of caspofungin for invasive Aspergillosis

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2011)
  • G. Wurthwein et al.

    Population pharmacokinetics of escalating doses of caspofungin in a phase II study of patients with invasive aspergillosis

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2013)
  • M.W. Pound et al.

    Echinocandin pharmacodynamics: review and clinical implications

    J Antimicrob Chemother

    (2010)
  • D. Andes et al.

    In vivo comparison of the pharmacodynamic targets for echinocandin drugs against Candida species

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2010)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text