Review
Myotonic dystrophy and the heart: A systematic review of evaluation and management

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.069Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The most common cardiac manifestations of myotonic dystrophy are due to conduction system disease

  • Cardiac disease is responsible for 30% of deaths in patients with myotonic dystrophy

  • The 12 lead electrocardiogram is the most useful risk stratification tool for predicting sudden death

  • Proactive treatment of patients with evidence of conduction system disease with pacing improves outcomes

Abstract

Myotonic dystrophy (MD) is a multisystem, autosomal dominant disorder best known for its skeletal muscle manifestations. Cardiac manifestations arise as a result of myocardial fatty infiltration, degeneration and fibrosis and present most commonly as arrhythmias or conduction disturbances. Guidelines regarding the optimal cardiac management of patients with MD are lacking. The present article provides a summary of the pathophysiology of cardiac problems in patients with MD and provides a practical approach to contemporary cardiac monitoring and management of these patients with a focus on the prevention of complications related to conduction disturbances and arrhythmias.

Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed and Medline. The keywords used in the search included “myotonic dystrophy”, “cardiac manifestations”, “heart”, “arrhythmia”, “pacemaker” and “defibrillator”, all terms were used in combination. In addition, “myotonic dystrophy” was searched in conjunction with “electrophysiology”, “electrocardiogram”, “echocardiograph”, “signal averaged electrocardiograph”, “magnetic resonance imaging” and “exercise stress testing”. The titles of all the articles revealed by the search were screened for relevance. The abstracts of relevant titles were read and those articles which concerned the cardiac manifestations of myotonic dystrophy or the investigation and management of cardiac manifestations underwent a full manuscript review.

Introduction

Myotonic dystrophy (MD) is the most common inherited muscular dystrophy in adulthood with an incidence of 1 in 8000 [1]. Cardiac involvement is an important cause of premature death in these patients. Despite being relatively common, guidelines regarding optimal investigation, management and follow-up of cardiac issues, particularly in asymptomatic patients with MD are lacking. The aim of this study was to comprehensively review the literature regarding cardiac manifestations of MD and to propose an evidence-based protocol for investigation, management and follow-up of asymptomatic cardiac abnormalities with a focus on arrhythmic manifestations.

Section snippets

Genetic basis

The genetic basis of MD type 1 is a mutational expansion of cytosine, thymine, guanine (CTG) repeats in the 3′ untranslated region of the Myotonic Dystrophy Protein Kinase (MDPK) gene, a serine–threonine protein kinase on chromosome 19. A normal allele contains between 5 and 35 repeats whereas alleles in patients with MD type 1 may contain up to 4000 CTG repeats. The disease is transmitted across generations in an autosomal dominant fashion with incomplete penetrance, variable phenotypic

Clinical cardiac manifestations

The early stages of cardiac involvement in MD are typically clinically silent. Phenotypic variability results in a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations even amongst members of the same family [24].

Clinical investigations

The management of overt cardiac manifestations does not differ significantly from patients without neuromuscular disorders. For example, pacemakers should be implanted in patients with symptomatic bradycardia as well as asymptomatic high-grade (type II and complete) atrioventricular heart block. Likewise, defibrillators should be considered in patients with documented sustained ventricular arrhythmias [53] according to their overall prognosis from the MD.

However, the risk stratification and the

Evidence for pacing and defibrillator implantation

There has been general support for early treatment of conduction disease in MD patients with pacemaker implantation. Age > 40 and significant ECG abnormalities are independent predictors of pacemaker implantation in these patients [28]. While the management of patients who are symptomatic or patients who have documented arrhythmias should not differ greatly from patients without MD, it appears that prophylactic implantation of pacemakers in patients with MD and high risk characteristics leads to

Recommendations and conclusions

Based on the available literature, we recommend a practical approach to cardiac investigation with the aim of efficiently identifying those patients with MD at risk of sudden death who would have a prognostic benefit from device implantation (Fig. 2). Furthermore, a multidisciplinary approach is advisable to ensure appropriate patient selection [53], [54].

All patients should undergo regular clinical evaluation, ECG, Holter monitoring and echocardiography. Pacemaker implantation should be

Conflict of interest

The authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest.

References (88)

  • A. Mammarella et al.

    Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and myocardial function in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1

    J. Neurol. Sci.

    (2002 Sep 15)
  • J. Finsterer et al.

    Arrhythmia-related workup in hereditary myopathies

    J. Electrocardiol.

    (2012 Jul–Aug)
  • W.J. Groh

    Arrhythmias in the muscular dystrophies

    Heart Rhythm.

    (2012 Nov)
  • H. Petri et al.

    Cardiac manifestations of myotonic dystrophy type 1

    Int. J. Cardiol.

    (2012 Oct 4)
  • L.E. Grigg et al.

    Ventricular tachycardia and sudden death in myotonic dystrophy: clinical, electrophysiologic and pathologic features

    J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

    (1985 Jul)
  • A. Lazarus et al.

    Relationship between cardiac arrhythmias and sleep apnoea in permanently paced patients with type I myotonic dystrophy

    Neuromuscul. Disord.

    (2007 May)
  • J. Harbison et al.

    Cardiac rhythm disturbances in the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy

    Chest

    (2000 Sep)
  • J.S. Gottdiener et al.

    Left ventricular relaxation, mitral valve prolapse, and intracardiac conduction in myotonia atrophica: assessment by digitized echocardiography and noninvasive His bundle recording

    Am. Heart J.

    (1982 Jul)
  • S. Hiromasa et al.

    Myotonic dystrophy: ambulatory electrocardiogram, electrophysiologic study, and echocardiographic evaluation

    Am. Heart J.

    (1987 Jun)
  • L. Badano et al.

    Left ventricular myocardial function in myotonic dystrophy

    Am. J. Cardiol.

    (1993 Apr 15)
  • D. Bhakta et al.

    Prevalence of structural cardiac abnormalities in patients with myotonic dystrophy type I

    Am. Heart J.

    (2004 Feb)
  • K.C. Fung et al.

    Myocardial tissue velocity reduction is correlated with clinical neurologic severity in myotonic dystrophy

    Am. J. Cardiol.

    (2003)
  • J.S. Child et al.

    Myocardial myotonia in myotonic muscular dystrophy

    Am. Heart J.

    (1995 May)
  • P. Lindqvist et al.

    Ventricular dysfunction in type 1 myotonic dystrophy: electrical, mechanical, or both?

    Int. J. Cardiol.

    (2010 Sep 3)
  • A.E. Epstein et al.

    ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmic devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons

    J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

    (2008 May 27)
  • M.T. Viitasalo et al.

    Ambulatory electrocardiographic recording in mild or moderate myotonic dystrophy and myotonia congenita (Thomsen's disease)

    J. Neurol. Sci.

    (1983 Dec)
  • C. Stollberger et al.

    Implantable loop recorders in myotonic dystrophy 1

    Int. J. Cardiol.

    (2011 Oct 20)
  • P.V. Fragola et al.

    Signal-averaged electrocardiography in myotonic dystrophy

    Int. J. Cardiol.

    (1995 Jun 2)
  • S. Kumar et al.

    Electrophysiology-guided defibrillator implantation early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction

    Heart Rhythm.

    (2010 Nov)
  • A. Lazarus et al.

    Long-term follow-up of arrhythmias in patients with myotonic dystrophy treated by pacing

    J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

    (2002)
  • V. Laurent et al.

    Mortality in myotonic dystrophy patients in the area of prophylactic pacing devices

    Int. J. Cardiol.

    (2011 Jul 1)
  • D.V. Exner et al.

    Beta-adrenergic blocking agent use and mortality in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a post hoc analysis of the studies of left ventricular dysfunction

    J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

    (1999 Mar 15)
  • J. Finsterer et al.

    Atrial fibrillation/flutter in myopathies

    Int. J. Cardiol.

    (2008 Aug 29)
  • P. Kaminsky et al.

    Age, conduction defects and restrictive lung disease independently predict cardiac events and death in myotonic dystrophy

    Int J Cardiol.

    (2013)
  • A. Di Cori et al.

    Early left ventricular structural myocardial alterations and their relationship with functional and electrical properties of the heart in myotonic dystrophy type 1

    J Am Soc Echocardiogr.

    (2009 Oct)
  • K. Wahbi et al.

    Impaired myocardial deformation detected by speckle-tracking echocardiography in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1

    Int J Cardiol.

    (2011 Nov 3)
  • G. Pelargonio et al.

    Myotonic dystrophy and the heart

    Heart

    (2002)
  • B.A. Hardin et al.

    Heart rate variability declines with increasing age and CTG repeat length in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1

    Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol.

    (2003 Jul)
  • N.R. Clarke et al.

    Does cytosine–thymine–guanine (CTG) expansion size predict cardiac events and electrocardiographic progression in myotonic dystrophy?

    Heart

    (2001 Oct)
  • C. Marchini et al.

    Correlations between individual clinical manifestations and CTG repeat amplification in myotonic dystrophy

    Clin. Genet.

    (2000 Jan)
  • M.C. Hermans et al.

    Structural and functional cardiac changes in myotonic dystrophy type 1: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

    J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.

    (2012)
  • K. Merlevede et al.

    Cardiac involvement and CTG expansion in myotonic dystrophy

    J. Neurol.

    (2002 Jun)
  • C.A. Thornton et al.

    Myotonic dystrophy patients have larger CTG expansions in skeletal muscle than in leukocytes

    Ann. Neurol.

    (1994 Jan)
  • D. Verhaert et al.

    Cardiac involvement in patients with muscular dystrophies: magnetic resonance imaging phenotype and genotypic considerations

    Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging

    (2011 Jan)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Cardiac Complications of Neuromuscular Disorders

      2021, Neuromuscular Disorders: Treatment and Management
    • Neurological complications of cardiomyopathies

      2021, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.

    View full text