Elsevier

International Journal of Cardiology

Volume 224, 1 December 2016, Pages 162-164
International Journal of Cardiology

Accuracy of administrative data for identification of patients with infective endocarditis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.030Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Infective endocarditis is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates that have plateaued over recent decades. Research to improve outcomes for these patients is limited by the rarity of this condition. Therefore, we sought to validate administrative database codes for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective validation study of International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10-CM) codes for infective endocarditis against clinical Duke criteria (definite and probable) at a large acute care hospital between October 1, 2013 and June 30, 2015. To identify potential cases missed by ICD-10-CM codes, we also screened the hospital's valvular heart surgery database and the microbiology laboratory database (the latter for patients with bacteremia due to organisms commonly causing endocarditis).

Results

Using definite Duke criteria or probable criteria with clinical suspicion as the reference standard, the ICD-10-CM codes had a sensitivity (SN) of 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81–0.95), specificity (SP) of 1 (95% CI, 1–1), positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.68–0.85) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 1 (95% CI, 1–1). Restricting the case definition to definite Duke criteria resulted in an increase in SN to 0.95 (95% CI, 0.86–0.99) and a decrease in PPV to 0.6 (95% CI, 0.49–0.69), with no change in specificity.

Conclusion

ICD-10-CM codes can accurately identify patients with infective endocarditis, and so administrative databases offer a potential means to study this infection over large jurisdictions, and thereby improve the prediction, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of this rare but serious infection.

Introduction

Infective endocarditis is a serious condition that continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite innovations in the detection and management of this disease, mortality has plateaued in recent decades; in-hospital mortality ranges from 15 to 30%, while five-year mortality is approximately 40% [1], [2], [3]. Non-lethal complications are common and can be debilitating, often necessitating prolonged, intensive and costly medical care [4], [5], [6].

These persistent challenges underscore the need for ongoing research of the epidemiology and outcomes of patients with infective endocarditis. Administrative databases represent a comprehensive and easily accessible source of patient information, and have been widely used to study this condition [6], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. In particular, with recent changes in the guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infective endocarditis, administrative databases have been used to evaluate the impact of such changes on disease incidence at the population level [14], [15], [16]. However, the utility of such research depends on accurate application of diagnostic codes. We therefore sought to validate the accuracy of the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10-CM) codes for infective endocarditis against a clinical reference standard.

Section snippets

General study design and data sources

We conducted a retrospective validation study of administrative codes for infective endocarditis using medical records from Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (SHSC), a large, acute care teaching hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The study was approved by the SHSC Research Ethics Board. We identified all patients who were discharged from SHSC with ICD-10-CM codes for infective endocarditis in any diagnostic field between October 1, 2013 and June 30, 2015. I33 (acute and subacute infective

Results

From October 1, 2013 to June 30, 2015, 119 discharges from SHSC received an ICD-10-CM code for infective endocarditis (I33, I38, I39), representing 99 unique patients. During the same period, there were 35,172 unique patients admitted to a medical or surgical service. The microbiology database yielded 477 patients with one or more positive blood cultures for microorganisms that commonly cause infective endocarditis, of whom 10 were included in the study. The valve surgery database included 262

Discussion

Administrative databases are critical to clinical epidemiology research involving rare conditions such as infective endocarditis, because many important observational research questions can only be addressed with large sample sizes that are unlikely to be accrued in any one hospital. However, to utilize administrative databases for this purpose, the diagnostic codes must be sufficiently accurate to detect patients with the condition of interest. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance

Conflict of interest

The current study was unfunded. The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Funding sources

Nick Daneman is supported by a clinician scientist salary award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Disclosures

None.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Divisions of Infectious Diseases, Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery and Neurology, and the Department of Critical Care Medicine, for enabling our multi-disciplinary case conferencing quality improvement initiative for patients with infective endocarditis. This validation study was nested within this quality improvement initiative.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (43)

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.

2

Contributed equally to supervision of this study and shares senior authorship.

View full text