Mini-Review
Exposure assessment of residential mould, fungi and microbial components in relation to children's health: Achievements and challenges

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.05.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Each day we are exposed to a complex mixture of microbial agents and components in indoor environments. A major part of this mixture derives from fungal and bacterial origin. The impact between those microbial agents in the home environment in relation to respiratory health in children is still a major issue in research. There is little known about the causal agents that provoke or arrest the development of allergic respiratory disorders in children. Identification is complicated by the biodiversity and variability of microbial components in indoor air as well as the lack of validated and standardized exposure assessment methods. In this review, we aim to consider all important aspects in terms of research which may encounter an epidemiological study. Apart from the need for standardized exposure assessment methods which consider cost, handling and effort, especially for the participants, we suggest that a combination of different analysis methods such as chemical and molecular methods may have the potential to best describe the microbial milieu in indoor environments at present. Further, the impact of mould and moisture remediation activities on health is still heavily under investigated, especially in larger prospective cohorts of children and should be a topic of future research. Moreover, the exposure to mould and microbial agents might be embedded in a broader spectrum of children's health such as behavior and cognitive development.

Introduction

Each day we are exposed to a complex mixture of microbial agents and components in indoor environments. A major part of this mixture derives from fungal, bacterial and viral origin (Nevalainen and Seuri, 2005). The impact between those microbial agents in the home environment in relation to respiratory health in children is still a major issue in research (WHO, 2009). There are a number of publications addressing more or less the same research questions such as exposure to fungal or bacterial agents in relation to respiratory and allergic health outcomes (for a review see Mendell et al., 2011). However, the research approaches can vary considerably in some cases which might be partly responsible for inconsistencies found in results (Tischer et al., 2011a).

Previous reviews focused mainly on summarizing exposure–response relationships (Fisk et al., 2007). We focus here on exposure assessment and analysis methods of mould and microbial agents, in addition to the summary of health effects. We aim to consider several important aspects of an epidemiological study such as the impact of different types of fungal and bacterial exposure and different assessment and analysis strategies. We further discuss findings from interventional studies on fungi removal and considered the potential relevance of gene–environment interactions. This work is focusing on what achievements has been made so far in terms of epidemiological research on mould exposure with emphasis on children and further, what are the future challenges and possible research directions concerning mould and microbial pollution in indoor environments.

Section snippets

Exposure to fungal and bacterial agents

Fungi and fungal components are natural and ubiquitous in indoor environments (Green et al., 2006). In ‘healthy’ indoor environments the predominant fungi are the outdoor air genera Cladosporium, Penicillium and Aspergillus (Nevalainen and Seuri, 2005, Jones et al., 2011). However, the presence of dampness or visible mould shifts the composition of the fungal profile toward ‘indicator organisms’ – species such as Penicillium chrysogenum, Penicillium expansum, Aspergillus versicolor, Aspergillus

Health effects of domestic mould and bacterial agents

Available data suggested 20% of the homes worldwide have dampness problems or visible mould (IOM, 2004). A large body of literature supports an association between living in a damp and mouldy environment and adverse respiratory and allergic health disorders in children throughout the world (IOM, 2004, Fisk et al., 2007, Seltzer and Fedoruk, 2007, WHO, 2009, Tischer et al., 2011a, Tischer et al., 2011b). However, being exposed to increased levels of bacteria and mould derived components early in

Assessment of mould and microbial agents

Apart from the difficulty of disentangling the impact of various microbial agents indoors, there is currently no standardised and valid exposure assessment method to measure exposure to microbial agents. Numerous strategies have been used to assess visible mould and microbial exposure in indoor environments in the past (Table 1).

The choice of specific exposure assessment method and the analysis method can significantly impact the interpretation of study findings. One common, simpler approach

Evidence from intervention studies on mould and fungi removal

Recent reviews on housing intervention and the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for indoor air quality concluded that there is sufficient evidence for reducing respiratory symptoms after remediation activities, however, this concerns mainly an adult population (WHO, 2009, Jacobs et al., 2010, Krieger et al., 2010, Rao and Phipatanakul, 2011). There is less knowledge about interventional trials on mould remediation in relation to allergic disorders in children. One prospective,

Gene–environment interactions

Apart from the complexity of the exposure, the development of allergic diseases is also based on a complex interplay between environmental and genetic factors. There are a number of genes associated with the development of asthma and allergies in genome wide association studies (Meyers, 2010, Moffatt et al., 2010). Mutations in the toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway genes, especially TLR 4 which is the major signalling receptor for lipopolysacchardies (LPS), were found to alter the response to

Conclusion and recommendations

Dampness and moisture damage is not only an important precondition for mould growth, but also favours the spread of bacterial and other microbial agents. In order to identify patterns of agents evoking harmful or protective effects on the development of asthma and allergic diseases, the focus should be on elaborated assessment and analyses techniques. Up to now, there is no standardised exposure assessment method which would help to better compare results from different studies, to detect

References (84)

  • S. Jovanovic et al.

    Indoor fungi levels in homes of children with and without allergy history

    Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health

    (2004)
  • Y.L. Lee et al.

    The association between glutathione S-transferase P1, M1 polymorphisms and asthma in Taiwanese schoolchildren

    Chest

    (2005)
  • A.H. Liu

    Endotoxin exposure in allergy and asthma: reconciling a paradox

    J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.

    (2002)
  • A.H. Liu

    Something old, something new: indoor endotoxin, allergens and asthma

    Paediatr. Respir. Rev.

    (2004)
  • D.A. Meyers

    Genetics of asthma and allergy: what have we learned?

    J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.

    (2010)
  • A. Muller et al.

    Increased incidence of allergic sensitisation and respiratory diseases due to mould exposure: results of the Leipzig Allergy Risk children Study (LARS)

    Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health

    (2002)
  • T. Reponen et al.

    Fungal fragments in moldy houses: a field study in homes in New Orleans and Southern Ohio

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2007)
  • T. Reponen et al.

    Visually observed mold and moldy odor versus quantitatively measured microbial exposure in homes

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2010)
  • J.M. Seltzer et al.

    Health effects of mold in children

    Pediatr. Clin. North Am.

    (2007)
  • E. von Mutius

    Allergies, infections and the hygiene hypothesis – the epidemiological evidence

    Immunobiology

    (2007)
  • M. Werner et al.

    TLR4 gene variants modify endotoxin effects on asthma

    J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.

    (2003)
  • W. Bischof et al.

    Predictors of high endotoxin concentrations in the settled dust of German homes

    Indoor Air

    (2002)
  • C.G. Bornehag et al.

    Dampness in buildings and health (DBH): report from an ongoing epidemiological investigation on the association between indoor environmental factors and health effects among children in Sweden

    Indoor Air

    (2004)
  • C. Braun-Fahrlander et al.

    Environmental exposure to endotoxin and its relation to asthma in school-age children

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2002)
  • G.L. Chew et al.

    Fungal extracellular polysaccharides, beta (1→3)-glucans and culturable fungi in repeated sampling of house dust

    Indoor Air

    (2001)
  • J. Douwes

    (1→3)-beta-d-Glucans and respiratory health: a review of the scientific evidence

    Indoor Air

    (2005)
  • J. Douwes et al.

    Does environmental endotoxin exposure prevent asthma?

    Thorax

    (2002)
  • J. Douwes et al.

    (1→3)-beta-d-Glucan and endotoxin in house dust and peak flow variability in children

    Am. J. Respir. Crit Care Med.

    (2000)
  • M.J. Ege et al.

    Exposure to environmental microorganisms and childhood asthma

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2011)
  • L.H. Engman et al.

    How valid are parents’ questionnaire responses regarding building characteristics, mouldy odour, and signs of moisture problems in Swedish homes?

    Scand. J. Public Health

    (2007)
  • W.J. Fisk et al.

    Meta-analyses of the associations of respiratory health effects with dampness and mold in homes

    Indoor Air

    (2007)
  • U. Gehring et al.

    House dust endotoxin and allergic sensitization in children

    Am. J. Respir. Crit Care Med.

    (2002)
  • U. Gehring et al.

    Bacteria and mould components in house dust and children's allergic sensitisation

    Eur. Respir. J.

    (2007)
  • J.F. Gent et al.

    Levels of household mold associated with respiratory symptoms in the first year of life in a cohort at risk for asthma

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (2002)
  • R.L. Gorny et al.

    Fungal fragments as indoor air biocontaminants

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2002)
  • B.J. Green et al.

    Airborne fungal fragments and allergenicity

    Med. Mycol.

    (2006)
  • J. Heinrich et al.

    Pets and vermin are associated with high endotoxin levels in house dust

    Clin. Exp. Allergy

    (2001)
  • J. Heinrich et al.

    Reproducibility of allergen, endotoxin and fungi measurements in the indoor environment

    J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol.

    (2003)
  • K. Huttunen et al.

    Production of proinflammatory mediators by indoor air bacteria and fungal spores in mouse and human cell lines

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (2003)
  • K. Huttunen et al.

    Comparison of mycobacteria-induced cytotoxicity and inflammatory responses in human and mouse cell lines

    Inhal. Toxicol.

    (2001)
  • A. Hyvarinen et al.

    Dust sampling methods for endotoxin – an essential, but underestimated issue

    Indoor Air

    (2006)
  • A. Hyvarinen et al.

    Characterizing microbial exposure with ergosterol, 3-hydroxy fatty acids, and viable microbes in house dust: determinants and association with childhood asthma

    Arch. Environ. Occup. Health

    (2006)
  • Cited by (51)

    • Airborne bacterial and fungal concentrations and fungal diversity in bedrooms of infant twins under 1 year of age living in Porto

      2022, Environmental Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In Portugal, the existing legislation for commercial and service buildings (Portaria n.o 353-A/2013 de 4 de dezembro, 2013) includes recommendation on the limit values for airborne bacterial and fungal levels as relevant indoor air quality (IAQ) indicators. It has been established that, in healthy buildings, indoor fungal concentrations should be lower than outdoors (Portaria n.o 353-A/2013 de 4 de dezembro, 2013), since the predominant fungi, including Cladosporium, Penicillium, Aspergillus and Alternaria genera and yeasts, have their main sources outdoors (Cabral, 2010; Tischer and Heinrich, 2013). These fungal genera can constitute sources of potentially hazardous components as allergens, volatile organic compounds (VOC) and mycotoxins to indoor air (Cabral, 2010; Gabriel et al., 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text