Commentary
Medical informatics: Past, present, future,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.06.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To reflect about medical informatics as a discipline. To suggest significant future research directions with the purpose of stimulating further discussion.

Methods

Exploring and discussing important developments in medical informatics from the past and in the present by way of examples. Reflecting on the role of IMIA, the International Medical Informatics Association, in influencing the discipline.

Results

Medical informatics as a discipline is still young. Today, as a cross-sectional discipline, it forms one of the bases for medicine and health care. As a consequence considerable responsibility rests on medical informatics for improving the health of people, through its contributions to high-quality, efficient health care and to innovative research in biomedicine and related health and computer sciences. Current major research fields can be grouped according to the organization, application, and evaluation of health information systems, to medical knowledge representation, and to the underlying signal and data analyses and interpretations. Yet, given the fluid nature of many of the driving forces behind progress in information processing methods and their technologies, progress in medicine and health care, and the rapidly changing needs, requirements and expectations of human societies, we can expect many changes in future medical informatics research. Future research fields might range from seamless interactivity with automated data capture and storage, via informatics diagnostics and therapeutics, to living labs with data analysis methodology, involving sensor-enhanced ambient environments. The role of IMIA, the International Medical Informatics Association, for building a cooperative, strongly connected, and research-driven medical informatics community worldwide can hardly be underestimated.

Conclusions

Health care continuously changes as the underlying science and practice of health are in continuous transformation. Medical informatics as a discipline is strongly affected by these changes and is in a position to be a key, active contributor in these changes.

Introduction

The aim of this essay is to reflect about medical informatics as a discipline.

Its main goal is to emphasize some promising future research directions which may become important parts of medical informatics (Section 4) while at the same time stimulating further discussion within our scientific community on these topics. In order to do this, it is helpful to be aware of important current aspects of the discipline (Section 3), and learn from past experience (Section 2). In all of these sections, emphasis will be placed on the role of IMIA, the International Medical Informatics Association [1], in influencing the direction of our discipline.

This is most certainly not the first, and is unlikely to be the last of this kind of reflection. Other debates about our discipline as a whole (or at least its major parts) can be found in [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] (in chronological order). These papers focus on questions on research aims and their corresponding challenges. Other papers focus more on research aims in the context of describing the discipline of medical informatics ([8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], in chronological order).

Last, but not least, there exist some historical ‘milestones’, where sets of papers have been gathered into special issues of journals in order to critically discuss the aims, scope and challenges of our discipline. Three of them, again with a focus on questions of research aims, will be mentioned here. In 1983 a SCAMCI-sponsored workshop on ‘medical information sciences’ took place in Washington (DC), USA, discussing among other questions about “principal research issues” [19, p. 167]. Although its scope was broader, this issue contained a couple of papers dealing with research (e.g. [20], [21], [22]). In 2001 in Madrid, Spain, a conference on challenges for medical informatics as an academic discipline took place. Major results have been published in [23] (see e.g. [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29]). In 2008 on the occasion of the 35th anniversary of the Heidelberg/Heilbronn curriculum of medical informatics a symposium on perspectives of medical informatics took place in Heidelberg, Germany. Results have been published in [30] (see e.g. [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]).

In this context it should be added that from time to time documents from committees, established by government or government-related institutions and professional societies, also discuss such challenges, mainly in order to define funding strategies or professional directions. Examples are published in [39], [40].

I still appreciate the generous offer of the now Editor Emeritus of the International Journal of Medical Informatics (IJMI), Arie Hasman, for not only giving me the opportunity of publishing a paper in 1997 on the aims and tasks of medical informatics [4], but also for his editing of a complete issue in IJMI debating and significantly adding to my suggestions on aims and tasks of medical informatics (e.g. [41]).

Many definitions of medical informatics as discipline can be found in the literature aiming at broad coverage and completeness. Here I simply want to refer to medical informatics as the discipline, dedicated to the systematic processing of data, information and knowledge in medicine and health care [42].

First, reflections such as those in the present paper, are necessarily subjective and biased by the author's background, i.e. his education, his professional career, his cultural and society roots.

Second, this essay does not intend to discuss the name of our discipline and its various subfields, although our discipline has had more than its share of such discussions, and even though such debates have been contributing to our discipline's development and its role in the practice of health care, education and research. Let me just mention that the meaning of the terms health informatics and medical informatics, and now also biomedical informatics, varies within and between different groups and geographical regions. The term medical informatics is used here in the broad and comprehensive meaning as defined in Section 1.3. For a more detailed discussion see e.g. [43]. Others may have preferred to use one of the other two names, mentioned above.

Section snippets

On the history of medical informatics

Medical informatics as a discipline is still young, in particular when you compare it with other medical disciplines. Yet, we can look back to a past of about 50 years, not to mention earlier roots on approaches for systematically processing of data, information and knowledge in medicine and health care in earlier history.

Our discipline's development correlates clearly with the invention and, within few decades, rapid dissemination of digital (‘von Neumann’) computers and the development of

The role of medical informatics today

In its early days medical informatics might have been considered as a ‘nice-to-have’ (but not ‘need-to-have’) discipline, both in biomedicine and health sciences as well as in computer science. In German this might be termed an ‘orchid discipline’ as being just a nice orchid in the garden of the sciences.

When looking back at the development of medical informatics, we can recognize that it has been growing steadily (see e.g. [64] in terms of published research), and that today, as a

Recapitulating the aims of medical informatics

Systematic processing of data, information and knowledge in medicine and health care does not exist for its own sake. Medical informatics is neither sufficiently defined by its methodology and technology on the one hand, nor by its application domain (such as the three application areas mentioned before) on the other hand. As usual for most disciplines, it also has practical aims, which for medical informatics are twofold:

  • -

    to contribute to progress in the sciences and

  • -

    to contribute to

Acknowledgments

These reflections are strongly influenced by the many discussions with colleagues, mainly, but by no means exclusively, from our scientific community. And, of course, also by many other persons, starting from students and ranging to, e.g., practitioners and policy makers. My acknowledgements go to all of them.

The author cordially thanks Jan Talmon, editor of IJMI, for his valuable comments on this text and for the opportunity to submit this paper to this prestigious journal. As an official

References (96)

  • R. Haux

    Health information systems–past, present, future

    Int. J. Med. Inform.

    (2006)
  • R. Haux et al.

    Health care in the information society. A prognosis for the year 2013

    Int. J. Med. Inform.

    (2002)
  • http://www.imia.org, last access: May 22,...
  • D.F. Sittig

    Grand challenges in medical informatics?

    J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.

    (1994)
  • R.B. Altman

    Informatics in the care of patients: ten notable challenges

    West J. Med.

    (1997)
  • R.A. Greenes et al.

    Audacious goals for health and biomedical informatics in the new millennium

    J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.

    (1998)
  • S. Kay

    Health informatics: challenges to progress

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (1999)
  • D.A.B. Lindberg

    Medicine in the 21st century: global problems, global solutions

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2002)
  • P.L. Reichertz

    Medical informatics—fiction or reality?

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (1980)
  • P.L. Reichertz

    Preparing for change: concepts and education in medical informatics

    Comput. Methods Programs Biomed.

    (1987)
  • R.A. Greenes et al.

    Medical informatics, an emerging academic discipline and institutional priority

    J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.

    (1990)
  • D.J. Protti et al.

    Can health/medical informatics be regarded as a separate discipline?

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (1995)
  • J.H. van Bemmel

    Medical informatics, art or science?

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (1996)
  • V. Maojo et al.

    Medical informatics and bioinformatics: integration or evolution through scientific crises?

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2006)
  • C.A. Kulikowski

    Introducing Kuhn et al.’s paper “Informatics and medicine—from molecules to populations” and invited papers on this special topic

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2008)
  • K.A. Kuhn et al.

    Informatics and medicine—from molecules to populations

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2008)
  • R.B. Altman et al.

    Commentaries on “Informatics and medicine: from molecules to populations”

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2008)
  • J.H. van Bemmel

    Medical informatics is interdisciplinary avant la lettre

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2008)
  • B. Blum (Ed.), A framework for medical information science, Med. Inform. 9 (1984)...
  • J.H. van Bemmel

    The structure of medical informatics

    Med. Inform.

    (1984)
  • M.S. Blois

    Medical information science as ‘science’

    Med. Inform.

    (1984)
  • E.H. Shortliffe

    The science of biomedical computing

    Med. Inform.

    (1984)
  • J.H. van Bemmel, M.A. Musen (Eds.), Challenges for medical informatics as an academic discipline, Methods Inf. Med. 41...
  • J.L. Talmon et al.

    Medical informatics as a discipline at the beginning of the 21st century

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2002)
  • M.A. Musen

    Medical informatics: searching for underlying components

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2002)
  • C.A. Kulikowski

    The micro-macro spectrum of medical informatics challenges: from molecular medicine to transforming health care in a globalizing society

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2002)
  • F. Martin-Sanchez et al.

    Integrating genomics into health information systems

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2002)
  • M. Stefanelli

    Knowledge management to support performance-based medicine

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2002)
  • J. van der Lei

    Closing the loop between clinical practice, research, and education: the potential of electronic patient records

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2002)
  • P. Knaup, H. Dickhaus (Eds.), Perspectives of medical informatics: advancing health care requires interdisciplinarity...
  • C.A. Kulikowski et al.

    Biomedical and health informatics in translational medicine

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2009)
  • H. Handels et al.

    Medical image computing for computer-supported diagnostics and therapy. Advances and perspectives

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2009)
  • H. Witte et al.

    Signal informatics as an advanced integrative concept in the framework of medical informatics. New trends demonstrated by examples derived from neuroscience

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2009)
  • S. Koch et al.

    On health-enabling and ambient-assistive technologies. What has been achieved and where do we have to go?

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2009)
  • H.U. Prokosch et al.

    Perspectives for medical informatics. Reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2009)
  • C. Ohmann et al.

    Future developments of medical informatics from the viewpoint of networked clinical research

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2009)
  • K.P. Pfeiffer

    Future development of medical informatics from the viewpoint of health telematics

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2009)
  • A. Winter

    The future of medical informatics. Some perspectives of intra- and inter-institutional information systems

    Methods Inf. Med.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (162)

    • Foundations of healthcare informatics

      2021, Demystifying Big Data, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning for Healthcare Analytics
    • Quantifying cross-disciplinary knowledge flow from the perspective of content: Introducing an approach based on knowledge memes

      2020, Journal of Informetrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      To address the research questions in this study, bibliographic data were obtained for an interdisciplinary field and related fields that transfer knowledge to the interdisciplinary field. Medical Informatics (MI) has been growing as a young cross-sectional discipline, which has integrated a variety of knowledge from related disciplines (Haux, 2010). This field has published a large number of articles in the pasting decades, resulting in a large capacity of references and knowledge memes.

    • Revision of prioritized EL ontologies

      2023, Applied Intelligence
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Dedicated to IMIA, the International Medical Informatics Association. Besides the honour to serve in IMIA during the last 15 years as Working Group Chair, as Board Member, as co-editor of the IMIA Yearbook and, now, as its President, I am grateful for the opportunity of meeting so many exceptional people at events of IMIA and of IMIA's member societies. The author has benefited much from their knowledge and insights during the course of countless discussions.

    ☆☆

    Written, extended version of a sequence of lectures, given on November 11, 2009, at CoMHI2009 in Hiroshima, Japan, on September 6, 2010, at gmds2010 in Mannheim, Germany, and on September 13, 2010, at Medinfo2010 in Cape Town, South Africa.

    1

    President of IMIA (2007–2010).

    View full text