ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Role of prophylactic uterine artery balloon catheters in the management of women with suspected placenta accreta

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2011.06.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Placenta praevia and accreta are leading causes of major obstetric haemorrhage and peripartum hysterectomy. Detection is largely based on a high index of clinical suspicion, though the diagnostic accuracy of radiological imaging is improving. Interventional radiological techniques can reduce blood loss and the incidence of hysterectomy.

Methods

We have reviewed our experience with bilateral prophylactic uterine artery balloon occlusion in the management of women with suspected placenta accreta. Thirteen women at high risk of major haemorrhage due to placenta praevia or suspected placenta accreta were retrospectively studied. Uterine artery balloons were placed prophylactically under neuraxial anaesthesia in the angiography suite followed by caesarean delivery in the obstetric operating theatre.

Results

Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements were low in our case series. There were no hysterectomies or admissions to the intensive care unit. Fetal bradycardia necessitating immediate caesarean delivery occurred in two women (15.4%).

Conclusion

In our case series in women with suspected placenta accreta, prophylactic use of uterine artery balloons was associated with a low requirement for blood transfusion but with possible increased risk of fetal compromise. Performing the interventional procedure at a different site from the operative room complicated management.

Introduction

Placenta praevia and placenta accreta are important causes of obstetric haemorrhage and leading causes of peripartum hysterectomy.1 The incidence of placenta accreta has increased with rising caesarean delivery (CD) rates and could be as high as 1 in 500 deliveries.2 Transcatheter arterial embolisation has been used to manage obstetric haemorrhage since 1979 and is associated with decreased blood loss and lower rates of hysterectomy compared with conventional techniques.[3], [4] Evidence for the efficacy of predelivery prophylactic pelvic artery balloon occlusion in patients at high risk of peripartum haemorrhage is weak and has largely considered only maternal outcome.[5], [6], [7] The lack of randomised clinical trials or large cohort studies precludes a consensus on the ideal management of placenta accreta.

Caesarean hysterectomy remains the prevailing surgical approach,8 although a number of uterine sparing procedures have been described.[9], [10] However, the significant associated morbidity, uncertainties in antenatal diagnosis and desire for fertility preservation, require continued efforts to improve outcome from conservative management of placenta accreta, with the aid of interventional radiology.[11], [12] Uterine artery occlusion, first described in 1998 for control of haemorrhage from fibroids, has been used successfully for managing postpartum haemorrhage secondary to placenta accreta.[13], [14] We present our experience of prophylactic bilateral uterine artery (UA) balloon occlusion in 13 women with suspected placenta accreta.

Section snippets

Methods

The records of women who had bilateral UA balloons inserted before elective CD, between March 2004 and January 2008, were reviewed retrospectively. Each case was conducted in a similar manner although no formal protocol was prescribed. A method evolved with experience which was rooted in our standard institutional practice for elective CD. A presumptive diagnosis of placenta accreta was based on a history of previous uterine surgery and an anterior low-lying placenta in the current pregnancy,

Results

The personal and obstetric characteristics of the 13 women studied are shown in Table 1. Eleven women had one or more CD and two women had previous surgical terminations of pregnancy (Cases 3 and 9). Placenta accreta was confirmed surgically in four women (31%). Uterine artery balloons were inflated in 12 women.

Mean [range] estimated blood loss (EBL) was 800 mL [300–2100]. Transfusion requirements ranged from 1–4 units of packed red blood cells and up to 600 mL of salvaged blood. One woman (Case

Case 4

Following insertion of the second UA balloon the FHR dropped rapidly to 70 beats/min. The woman was immediately placed in the full left lateral position and supplemental oxygen administered but without improvement in the FHR. The balloons were then partially withdrawn resulting in rapid recovery of FHR to >140 beats/min. The woman was transferred urgently to the obstetric operating theatre maintaining the left lateral position. On arrival, the FHR was non-reassuring and immediate delivery was

Case 12

Insertion of the first femoral sheath was complicated by a groin haematoma. Following the second balloon insertion the woman complained of lower abdominal cramp at which time the FHR was 140 beats/min. The spinal catheter was topped-up with 0.5% plain bupivacaine 1 mL. Shortly after, the FHR dropped to 50 beats/min. As UA spasm was suspected, glyceryl trinitrate 300 μg was administered through the UABC. There were no significant effects on maternal cardiovascular variables but the FHR increased to

Discussion

Transcatheter embolisation has been used in the management of postpartum haemorrhage for 30 years as a sole technique or as an adjunct to surgical ligation. Surgical ligation of the internal iliac arteries (IIA) is successful in controlling bleeding in about 50% of cases,9 with bilateral IIA ligation reducing distal flow by only 50%, and pulse pressure by about 25%.15 Ligation of the UA is effective in reducing the blood supply to the uterus and can avoid hysterectomy.16

Over the past 15 years

References (30)

Cited by (49)

  • Perioperative prophylactic internal iliac artery balloon occlusion in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in placenta previa: a randomized controlled trial

    2020, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The possible reasons for the failure of internal iliac artery balloon occlusion to show benefits could be because surgical hemostasis was adequate for most of the placenta previa cases, and because collateral circulation such as ovarian arterial supply could not be controlled by internal iliac artery occlusion. A concern of internal iliac artery catheterization is procedure-related complications, which was reported to have an incidence ranging from 7.7% to 36%.53–56 In our study, none of the patients had procedure-related complications.

  • Thrombosis after aortic balloon occlusion during cesarean delivery for abnormally invasive placenta

    2018, International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, the risks associated with ABO cannot be ignored. In reports describing internal iliac artery or uterine artery balloon occlusion in AIP patients during cesarean delivery, balloon catheterization-associated complications included claudication,15 catheter displacement,18,19 groin hematoma,17 arterial thrombosis,19,22–25 pseudoaneurysm,22 arterial rupture,22 and sciatic nerve ischemia.26 In addition, ABO may potentially cause severe complications such as lower limb and pelvic organ ischemia, necrosis, and aortic rupture.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text