International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Clinical PaperTraumaComplications related to midfacial fractures: operative versus non-surgical treatment
Introduction
Patients with midfacial fractures often present to maxillofacial emergency departments following sport accidents, traffic accidents or violence.8 Owing to the heterogeneous presentation of midfacial injuries and the concomitant injuries, deciding on treatment may be difficult and possible complications and their relative risk play a crucial role in the decision. The decision making process is complicated by the frequent presence of multiple fractures and concomitant injuries, and iatrogenic complications.
The initial diagnostic management is well established and standardized2, 10. A precise clinical and radiological examination includes the orbit, eye ball and soft tissues, and neighbouring structures8, 11, 12. Concomitant injuries are common and include haematomas, ocular injuries, and nerve disturbances. The incidence of infraorbital nerve (ION) paraesthesias is common1, 7, 13. The underlying pathophysiology is heterogeneous; the nerve can be injured because it lies within the fracture or it can be affected by haemorrhage or oedema. The influence of surgical procedures on the nerve's regenerative capacity is also controversial. Another complication of midfacial fractures is meteorosensitivity (pain or discomfort caused by certain weather conditions), which is often mentioned by patients as a reason for decreased quality of life after osteosynthetically treated midfacial fractures.
These complications can also be provoked iatrogenically or can be reduced by the choice of treatment. Although many studies have investigated the complications related to different surgical treatments or types of fractures, little attention has been paid to complications related to non-surgical treatment.
The aim of this study is to investigate and evaluate complications related to midfacial trauma and to the non-surgical or surgical treatment used to treat it.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The authors carried out a retrospective review of the records 844 patients with midfacial injuries introduced to their department between January 2001 and December 2003. These patients were treated either non-surgically or surgically. Surgical treatment is defined as active closed or open reduction with osteosynthesis; non-surgical treatment includes any other treatment option. The criteria for surgical treatment were displacement and/or impairment of functionality.
Initially the following
Results
Between January 2001 and December 2003, the data from 844 patients with midfacial injuries were recorded in a database. 740 patients (88%) presented had fractures in the midface and were included in this investigation. The main causes of these fractures and the concomitant injuries were sports accidents (33%) followed by road accidents (15%), violence (10%) and accidents at work (8%) (Table 1).
Discussion
Midfacial fractures are a common injury in oral and maxillofacial surgery. At the authors’ institution in Innsbruck, near the Alps, the cause is mainly related to sports activities8. Sport-related injuries tend to lead to midfacial fractures6. Midfacial fractures affect a variety of neighbouring anatomical structures that are likely to be involved in the patho-mechanism of concomitant injuries. Treatment depends on the seriousness of the injury. The indication for surgical intervention is
Funding
None.
Competing interests
None declared.
Ethical approval
Not required.
References (21)
- et al.
The conservative management of facial fractures: indications and outcomes
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
(2007) Fractures of the orbital floor: indications for exploration and for the use of a floor implant
J Maxillofac Surg
(1984)- et al.
Cranio-maxillofacial trauma: a 10 year review of 9,543 cases with 21,067 injuries
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
(2003) - et al.
Craniomaxillofacial trauma in the elderly
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1995) - et al.
Traumatic intracranial haemorrhage in conscious patients with facial fractures—a review of [1959] cases
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
(2008) - et al.
The impact of ageing on cranio-maxillofacial trauma-a comparative investigation
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2007) - et al.
Nonsurgical management of blow-out fractures of the orbital floor
Am J Ophthalmol
(1974) - et al.
A prospective study on changes in the sensibility of the oral mucosa and the mucosa of the upper lip after Le Fort I osteotomy
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
(1994) - et al.
A prospective electromyographic and computer-aided thermal sensitivity assessment of nerve lesions after sagittal split osteotomy and Le Fort I osteotomy
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2001) - et al.
The evaluation of surgical factors related to recovery period of upper lip hypoaesthesia after Le Fort I osteotomy
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
(2008)