International perspectives on management of acute otitis media: a qualitative review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2003.09.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: Current opinions regarding the management of acute otitis media (AOM) in children vary across Western countries. With antibiotic resistance rising and more evidence regarding the limited clinical efficacy of antibiotics becoming available, interest in managing AOM other than with antibiotics is renewed. Objectives: To compare international rates of antibiotic prescription and surgery for AOM. To provide current evidence regarding the efficacy of various treatment options for AOM and their potential complications. Methods: Qualitative (narrative) review. Results: The percentage of patients given antibiotics for AOM varies from 31% in The Netherlands to more than 90% in most other Western countries. The 1998 prevalence of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains, on the other hand, ranges from 3% in The Netherlands to 53% in France. The surgical rate for tympanostomy tubes varies from 2 per 1000 children per year in the United Kingdom to 20 per 1000 in The Netherlands. The benefit of both antibiotic and surgical therapy in AOM appears to be limited, with numbers needed to treat ranging from 8 to 25 for antibiotic therapy, depending on the definition of outcome. Conclusions: International rates of antibiotic prescription and surgery for AOM vary strongly, which can be explained largely by the lack of uniform evidence-based guidelines. International debates with the aim of overcoming cultural differences regarding the management of otitis media, and of reaching agreement on guidelines on the basis of current evidence are necessary.

Introduction

Otitis media (OM) continues to be one of the most common childhood infections and is the leading cause of doctors’ visits by children [1]. The incidence of acute otitis media (AOM) is highest in children aged less than 2 years of age. Up to 62% of the children experience at least one attack of AOM during the first year of life and over 70% have contracted AOM before their second birthday [2], [3].

Although current opinions regarding the management of acute otitis media (AOM) in children vary across Western countries, AOM is one of the most common indications for both antibiotic treatment [4] and surgery [5] in children in most countries. The evidence regarding the effectiveness of these therapies, however, is marginal. Consequently, the international rates of antibiotic prescription and surgery for AOM show a large variation.

With antibiotic resistance of bacteria rising, the issue whether AOM should be managed aggressively or conservatively is renewed. To decide upon the best alternative, knowledge is needed, not only of the efficacy of various treatment options, but also of its potential complications. In this paper we will (1) compare international rates of antibiotic prescription and surgery for AOM, and (2) provide evidence regarding the efficacy of these treatment options and their complications.

Section snippets

Methods

A systematic search was performed with MEDLINE from 1966 to January 2003 with the subject headings “otitis media”, “randomised controlled trial”, “antibiotics”, “ventilation tubes”, “grommets”, “adenoidectomy”, “practice management”, “antibiotic resistance”, and “complications”.

In addition, the four-yearly published Research Conference Reports on Recent Advances in Otitis Media as well as the proceedings of major international otitis media conferences were included. A review of identified

Antibiotic therapy

Cars et al. [6] recently reported data on outpatient antibiotic sales for 1997 in 15 countries of the European Union (Fig. 1). They showed that the daily-defined dose of antibiotics per 1000 people—irrespective of the condition for which they were prescribed—varied more than fourfold between European countries, from 9 in The Netherlands to 37 in France. It is obvious that this large variation cannot be explained by differences in frequency of bacterial infections.

In 1986 Froom et al. [7]

Discussion

In this paper, we have demonstrated that there are large differences in antibiotic prescription and surgical rates for AOM across the Western world, and that a restrictive policy regarding antibiotics might go together with a more liberal policy regarding surgery for AOM. These international differences regarding management of AOM are possible because there is little evidence about the efficacy of antibiotics and surgery, and uniform management guidelines for AOM in children are missing.

Other

References (35)

  • D.W. Teele et al.

    Epidemiology of otitis media during the first seven years of life in children in Greater Boston: a prospective, cohort study

    J. Infect Dis.

    (1989)
  • L.F. McCaig et al.

    Trends in antimicrobial drug prescribing among office-based physicians in the United States

    JAMA

    (1995)
  • M.F. Owings et al.

    Ambulatory and inpatient procedures in the United States, 1996

    Vital. Health Stat.

    (1998)
  • J. Froom et al.

    Diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute otitis media: report from International Primary Care Network

    BMJ

    (1990)
  • J. Mason et al.

    Impact of effective health care bulletin on treatment of persistent glue ear in children: time series analysis

    BMJ

    (2001)
  • P.C. Coyte et al.

    Physician and population determinants of rates of middle-ear surgery in Ontario

    JAMA

    (2001)
  • J.A.M. Engel, L.J.C. Anteunis, J.J.T. Hendriks, Treatment with grommets in The Netherlands: incidence in children from...
  • Cited by (87)

    • Acute Otitis Media and Otitis Media with Effusion

      2014, Cummings Pediatric Otolaryngology
    • Moraxella catarrhalis

      2014, Molecular Medical Microbiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text