International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Audiologic profile of infants at risk: Experience of a Western Sicily tertiary care centre
Introduction
According to world statistics research, hearing loss (HL) is one of the most common congenital anomalies, occurring in ∼1–3 cases per 1000 newborn infants in the well-infant population while, in certain “higher risk” populations this value could increase 10- to 50-fold, varying from country to country. Normal hearing (NH) is one of the central nervous system's most essential tools for creating the physiological processes of integration, abstraction and creation of “internal speech”, which is a necessary foundation of the thought process; such an early diagnosis and intervention, before six months of age, is effective in allowing children with congenital hearing loss to acquire appropriate cognitive and spoken language skills [1], [2], [3], [4]. The potential benefits of early detection can only be realized if an effective newborn hearing-screening program is performed, especially on infant at risk. The 2007 Position Statement from the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) confirmed that neonates who are in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) for >5 days, or who have risk factors and a shorter stay, undergo hearing screening with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and (automated) auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing, that is recommended for screening because of the increased occurrence of neural (auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony) loss in this population, compared with well infants [1]. If the neonates do not pass the tests, then a full diagnostic audiological assessment is to be performed by an experienced audiologist [1].
Risk indicators associated with permanent congenital, delayed-onset, or progressive hearing loss in childhood given in the 2007 Position Statement [1] expand those of older risk registries [5]. Although a family history of hearing loss (syndromic or nonsyndromic), cranio-facial abnormalities, prenatal infections, hyperbilirubinemia requiring exchange transfusion, and culture-positive sepsis remain risk factors, other independent neonatal risk factors have been reported [1]. These risk factors include a need for ventilation, use of oxygen supplementation, respiratory failure, low Apgar scores, acidosis, use of ototoxic drugs including furosemide (especially with high serum creatinine levels), treatment for hypotension, patent ductus arteriosus ligation, hyponatremia, and noise [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Interaction among risk factors has been shown [11].
Even if an newborn hearing screening (NHS) is implemented in most parts of the developed world as an essential component of neonatal care, in Italy there is no stipulated modality for achieving the goal of early hearing detection in individual regions. In fact, the initiatives are still left to individual hospitals that have activated locale programs based on the collaboration of the single birth centers and the Audiology Sections.
The Department of Audiology of Palermo University represents the main speech and hearing third level centre in Western Sicily; waiting for a NHS sponsored by Regional Health Department, it daily performs an audiological assessment to those infants at risk born in Western Sicily and transferred from NICUs and/or regular nurseries to our specialized area.
The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of permanent childhood hearing impairment (PCHI) on population at risk; to classify the degree and type of hearing loss describing the main causes associated with SNHL in infants at risk in Western Sicily focusing on the importance of a suitable and adequate hearing assessment especially for those populations at risk for permanent hearing impairment. The final purpose of this study was to investigate the referral rate and the false-positive and false-negative rates for the single TEOAE technique and the combination of TEOAE/ABR technique in infant at risk; comparing two screening protocols, we attempted to find the better technique that could give high sensitivity (the proportion of children without SNHL who have a negative test, i.e. are correctly identified by the screening protocol) and acceptable specificity (the proportion of children without SNHL who have a negative test, i.e. are correctly identified by the screening protocol) for hearing screening/diagnosis of infants at risk.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
This study was carried out by the Department of Audiology, University of Palermo and investigated all infants transferred from the births centers of Western Sicily, with the purpose to identify risk indicators for permanent congenital, delayed-onset, or progressive sensorineural hearing loss, from January 2010 to June 2011; the population consisted of 424 infants, 248 males and 176 females, ranging from 4 to 20 weeks of life at the time of first appointment. Following Ethical Committee
Results
The total number of infants at risk examined from January 2010 to June 2011 was 412, corresponding to 171 females (41.50%) and 241 males (59.50%) with a male:female ratio = 1.40; the age of infants at first diagnostic ABR measurement, ranged from 4 to 20 weeks of life, with no statistical difference among the sex (t = 0.86; fd = 410; p = 0.38). Of the 412 infants examined, 239 (58.01%) resulted positive for a specific risk factor while in 173 cases, corresponding to 41.99%, multiple risk factors were
Discussion
In the general population, a newborn every 500–1000 births presents permanent hearing impairment (HI) greater than the incidence of other diseases routinely screened at birth [15], [16]. Moreover, in certain ‘higher risk’ populations, this incidence could increase to 8–100 cases per 1000 infants. The importance of deafness for the public health comes from its tendency to cause sequelae and complications such as irreversible delay in speech and cognitive development. To prevent these
Conclusion
With an incidence of 11.41% of SNHL in infants at risk this study demonstrates the necessity to implement a NHS program in Western Sicily; according to JCIH, the gold standard for NICU babies which are at risk for ANSD is the combined TEOAE/ABR technique. As data literature reports, ‘family history’ of HI is an independent significant risk factor for SNHL easily diagnosed through single TEOAE technique that is able to detect the cochlear genesis of HI with the same accuracy as ABR technique (p =
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
References (48)
- et al.
Neonatal status and hearing loss in high-risk infants
J. Pediatr.
(1989) - et al.
Newborn hearing screening project using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: Western Sicily experience
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(2007) - et al.
On the threshold of effective well infant nursery hearing screening in Western Sicily
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(2012) - et al.
Screening to detect permanent childhood hearing impairment in neonates transferred from the newborn nursery
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(2009) - et al.
An initial overestimation of sensorineural hearing loss in NICU infants after failure on neonatal hearing screening
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(2011) - et al.
Newborn hearing screening on infants at risk
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(2009) - et al.
Newborn hearing screening and strategy for early detection of hearing loss in infants
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(2009) - et al.
Risk factors associated with hearing loss in infants: an analysis of 5282 referred neonates
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(2011) Year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs
Pediatrics
(2007)- et al.
The Colorado newborn hearing screening project: effects on speech and language development for children with hearing loss
J. Perinatol.
(2000)
Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing
Pediatrics
Beyond newborn screening: early diagnosis and management of hearing loss in infants
Adv. Neonatal Care
Position statement 1982
Pediatrics
Unexpected hearing loss in high-risk infants
Pediatrics
Risk factors of sensorineural hearing loss in preterm infants
Biol. Neonate
Perinatal asphyxia, hypoxia, ischemia, and hearing loss: an overview
Scand. Audiol.
Noise: a hazard for the fetus and newborn
Pediatrics
Sensorineural hearing loss and prematurity
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
Treated hypotension is associated with neonatal morbidity and hearing loss in extremely low birth weight infants
Pediatrics
Prevalence and independent risk factors for hearing loss in NICU infants
Acta Paediatr.
Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds
Ear Hear
Neonatal screening for hearing disorders in infants at risk: incidence, risk factors, and follow-up
Pediatrics
Newborn hearing screening: the great omission
Pediatrics
Health service implications of changes in aetiology and referral patterns of hearing impaired children in Trent 1985–1993
Cited by (40)
Association between Hyperbilirubinemia and Hearing Screen Failure in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in Infants Born Preterm
2021, Journal of PediatricsCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, auditory neuropathy is missed with otoacoustic emissions testing, which was the testing method for at least 4% of infants in this study. Auditory neuropathy is associated with hyperbilirubinemia more than other etiologies of hearing loss.47,48 However, the exclusion of these infants did not change the association between hyperbilirubinemia and a failed hearing screen.
Changes in auditory function in premature children: A prospective cohort study
2020, International Journal of Pediatric OtorhinolaryngologyCitation Excerpt :Moreover, all children in this study had two or more risk factors for hearing loss, including congenital infection (e.g. cCMV), prolonged respiratory support, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, comorbid pathology represented by persistent hemodynamically significant PDA, BPD, ROP, and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. These observations reflect the results of other recent studies which show that the risk of hearing loss in very premature infants is higher when there is a combination of different risk factors involved [3,8,11,17,39]. It is also known that this risk increases from 1.3% in cases featuring no comorbid pathology to 25% in cases where three comorbid conditions are co-present [17,40].
Newborn hearing screening protocols and their outcomes: A systematic review
2018, International Journal of Pediatric OtorhinolaryngologyWhen should automatic auditory brainstem response test be used for newborn hearing screening?
2015, Auris Nasus LarynxThe relationship between neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and sensorineural hearing loss
2015, Acta Otorrinolaringologica EspanolaAuditory dyssynchrony or auditory neuropathy: Understanding the pathophysiology and exploring methods of treatment
2014, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology