International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
ICRT 2003: Translational research and pre-clinical strategy studyTarget cells in radiation pneumopathy
Introduction
Lung cancer presents a major challenge to radiation oncology. This is not because of extraordinary radioresistance of the different histologic types of lung cancer but rather due to their tendency to infiltrate early into large parts of the organ of origin (i.e., the lung), which, unfortunately, is the most radiosensitive vitally important organ in the body. Recent studies with deoxyglucose positron emission tomography have demonstrated that, in particular in locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer, much more often than previously assumed, clinically manifest tumor is present in the contralateral lymph nodes and at some distance from the primary tumor and the bulk of affected mediastinal lymph nodes (1). To include all of this clinical tumor volume in a single primary target volume would often lead to unacceptable volumes. Therefore, the clinical problem of critical targets for lung cancer is not so much the radiobiology of lung cancer. The main problem that limits the success rate of radiotherapy (RT) in lung cancer is the radiosensitivity of the normal tissue into which the tumor infiltrates and which, therefore, has to be given very high radiation doses. With present RT techniques and radiobiologic knowledge about the possibilities of modification of radiation effects, they often exceed local normal tissue tolerance.
Radiation-induced lung damage, radiation pneumopathy, is a continuous process. Subclinical early damage in pneumocytes type I progresses to an acute interstitial inflammation at 6–12 weeks after the onset of RT and further to lung fibrosis after many months and years. In patients, the different phases of this pathologic process can best be diagnosed using radiologic methods such as plain chest X-rays or particularly well using CT.
The radiologic picture of radiation pneumonitis is characterized by inhomogeneous opacity of the irradiated volume and increased density of septal structures. The clinical symptoms are dominated by dry, unproductive cough and more or less severe dyspnea, which is not necessarily closely related to the size of the irradiated lung volume. Dyspnea, thus, is a very characteristic sign of the acute inflammation phase of radiation pneumopathy. Because it can be easily measured, it also serves as a common response criterion in animal experiments of radiation-induced lung damage.
The radiologic picture of lung fibrosis is characterized by contracted, dense scar tissue that occupies a much smaller volume than the originally irradiated volume and is surrounded by hypodense volumes indicating compensatory emphysema. The clinical symptoms are dominated by dyspnea and may also include signs of right heart failure secondary to pulmonary hypertension.
Histopathologically, radiation pneumopathy is characterized by the focal infiltration of inflammatory cells into the pulmonary interstitium, which is associated, right from the beginning, with the deposition of intercellular matrix material, leading finally to the destruction of the alveolar histoarchitecture. The focal nature of histopathologic changes is remarkable in view of the random nature of energy deposition and cell inactivation by radiation; however, similar nonrandom damage development has been described in other irradiated tissues such as the spinal cord (2) and heart (3).
The alveolar epithelium consists of type I and type II epithelial cells in an almost balanced numeric proportion. Type I cells cover approximately 90% of the alveolar surface and type II pneumocytes represent the replicator precursors of type I cells. In normal steady state, the turnover time of the alveolar epithelium is approximately 4–5 weeks. After toxic injury, the alveolar surface is denuded because of the high vulnerability of the flat type I epithelial cells and proliferation of type II pneumocytes may accelerate more than 10-fold (4), with a great number of cytokines, growth factors, and cyclins regulating this response. Over the course of several days, type II pneumocyte proliferation results in alveolar reepithelialization. The immediate proliferative reaction of type II cells after injury may be the key event in the sufficient restoration of the alveolar epithelial surface. For this reason, agents, such as the herbicide paraquat, the antineoplastic drug bleomycin and, naturally, radiation, that are toxic to both type I and type II cells or which inhibit type II cell proliferation preferentially induce the irreversible reaction leading to pulmonary fibrosis (4).
Section snippets
Clinical studies on radiation pneumopathy
Few other internal organs present themselves as well to clinical investigation of morphologic changes and functional consequences in human patients as the irradiated lung. Several careful studies on the changes in lung density, overall and local impairment of vascular circulation, and of global and local gas exchange have been performed that provide excellent quantitative data not matched by those from any experimental animal (with the possible exception of studies on pig lungs). Therefore, the
Experimental studies in rats after partial lung irradiation
As important as the clinical experiments in irradiated patients are, limitations exist as to what can be done in patients to elucidate the pathogenetic processes, in particular in the lung in which we anticipate extensive interaction between different tissue components. Animal experiments are needed to complement the information derived from the functional, imaging, and invasive assessments of patients. However, because the pathogenesis is very complex, the experimental model should be suitable
Outlook and further research
The complexity of the pathogenesis of radiation pneumopathy, fascinating as it is, poses, however, great difficulties to radiobiologic research. Not the least difficulty is that, radiobiologists, who have been trained to think quantitatively and, if at all possible, in terms of cell numbers have to change their way of thinking. From all the recent data on the pathogenesis of radiation pneumopathy, it is evident that numeric cellular changes play a much smaller role than functional cellular
Conclusion
Radiation pneumopathy represents one of the greatest challenges to radiobiology, because radiation-induced lung disease is the limiting factor for improvements of the as yet dismal prospects of cure of the most common and most aggressive cancer in humans. There is no doubt that with improvement in identifying more reliably the distribution of clinical and subclinical disease within the thorax (e.g., using deoxyglucose positron emission tomography) and painting the dose distribution to the
References (23)
- et al.
18-FDT-PET/CT integrationImpact on target and critical organs in radiation therapy of non-small cell lung carcinoma—A prospective study
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2002) - et al.
Radiation and the lungA re-evaluation of the mechanisms mediating pulmonary injury
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1995) - et al.
Early alterations in extracellular matrix and transforming growth factor β gene expression in mouse lung indicative of late radiation fibrosis
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1994) - et al.
Dose-dependent induction of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) in the lung tissue of fibrosis-prone mice after thoracic irradiation
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2000) - et al.
A perpetual cascade of cytokines postirradiation leads to pulmonary fibrosis
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1995) - van der Kogel AJ. The nervous system: Radiobiology and experimental pathology. In: Scherer E, Streffer C, Trott KR,...
Radiation-induced heart diseaseReview of experimental data on dose response and pathogenesis
Int J Radiat Biol
(1992)- et al.
Alterations in the alveolar epithelium after injury leading to pulmonary fibrosis
Histol Histopathol
(1996) - et al.
Dose-effect relations for early local pulmonary injury after irradiation for malignant lymphoma and breast cancer
Radiother Oncol
(1998) - et al.
Lung reactions to radiotherapy of lung cancerConsequential effects and modulating factors
Radiother Oncol
(2002)