Clinical investigation
Ovary
Intraoperative radiation therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer

Presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society, Houston, TX, April 26–30, 2003, and the 35th Annual Meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, San Diego, CA, February 7–11, 2004.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.04.007Get rights and content

Purpose: To evaluate disease outcomes and complications in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT).

Methods and Materials: A retrospective study of 24 consecutive patients with ovarian carcinoma who underwent secondary cytoreduction and intraoperative radiation therapy at our institution between 1994 and 2002 was conducted. After optimal cytoreductive surgery, IORT was delivered with orthovoltage X-rays (200 kVp) using individually sized and beveled cone applications. Outcomes measures were local control of disease, progression-free interval, overall survival, and treatment-related complications.

Results: Of these 24 patients, 22 were available for follow-up analysis. Additional treatment at the time of and after IORT included whole abdominopelvic radiation, 9; pelvic or locoregional radiation, 5; chemotherapy, 6; and no adjuvant treatment, 2. IORT doses ranged from 9–14 Gy (median, 12 Gy). The anatomic sites treated were pelvis (sidewalls, vaginal cuff, presacral area, anterior pubis), para-aortic and paracaval lymph node beds, inguinal region, or porta hepatitis. At a median follow-up of 24 months, 5 patients remain free of disease, whereas 17 patients have recurred, of whom 4 are alive with disease and 13 died from disease. Five patients recurred within the radiation fields for a locoregional relapse rate of 32% and 12 patients recurred at distant sites with a median time to recurrence of 13.7 months. Five-year overall survival was 22% with a median survival of 26 months from time of IORT. Nine patients (41%) experienced Grade 3 toxicities from their treatments.

Conclusion: In carefully selected patients with locally recurrent ovarian cancer, combined IORT and tumor reductive surgery is reasonably tolerated and may contribute to achieving local control and disease palliation.

Introduction

Notwithstanding the improvement in the relative survival of women diagnosed with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer from 37% to 43% over the past three decades, ovarian cancer survival rate remains much lower compared with the 61.5% overall cancer survival statistic for women (1). A major issue is tumor recurrence within the first 3 years despite an initially promising tumor response (2, 3, 4). Recurrence of chemoresistant ovarian cancer is usually a fatal occurrence because the salvage rate with current treatment modalities is very low. The median disease-free survival is approximately 20–25 months with a median overall survival of 50 months in optimally debulked advanced-stage patients (5, 6, 7). Attempts at improving outcomes for these patients with additional systemic treatments using intravenous and intraperitoneal chemotherapy, regional radiotherapy, and high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation have been described in the literature (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16). Response rates to these various treatment modalities have varied, with some studies showing potential benefit of some type of therapy compared with no further treatment. Few studies definitively prove prolongation of life, with room remaining for treatment improvements with respect to efficacy, safety, and toxicity.

The disappointing median overall survival rates have therefore prompted studies of numerous multimodality treatments in adjunctive, sequential, or consolidative settings. In fact, the role of radiotherapy as an adjuvant or salvage therapeutic modality in recurrent, chemoresistant ovarian cancer has been extensively investigated with curative potential demonstrated in a selected subgroup of patients (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22). In this radiosensitive tumor, adjuvant whole abdominopelvic radiation therapy (WAPRT) has been reported to be effective and be of benefit for patients with minimal residual ovarian cancer (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24). Recently, two well-designed prospective randomized trials showed a survival benefit in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer randomized to receive postchemotherapy whole-abdominal radiation vs. no additional treatment (13) and in patients with pathologic complete response after chemotherapy randomized to whole-abdominal radiation vs. additional chemotherapy vs. no further treatment (14). However, well-documented toxicities related to WAPRT, including acute hematologic and delayed intestinal side effects (17, 24) constrain the amount of tolerable external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) that can be delivered. Although the EBRT dose to the whole abdomen is limited by the radiation tolerance of the small intestine, liver, and kidney to approximately 20–25 Gy, the optimal EBRT dose necessary to control microscopic upper abdominal disease is in the range of 22.5–30 Gy. Macroscopic tumor deposits would require even higher doses of EBRT—around 50–60 Gy—for disease control (25, 26). These factors, along with the advent of new chemotherapeutic agents, have, therefore, led to a decline in the use of WAPRT in ovarian cancer.

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), which delivers a single high dose of radiation to the tumor bed directly, is an important treatment modality in the management of gynecologic malignancies. A single-dose IORT has been reported to have two to three times the biologic effect of fractionated EBRT, with an IORT dose of 15 Gy being equivalent to 30–45 Gy of fractionated EBRT (27). IORT, therefore, can deliver sufficiently high doses of radiation to residual tumor cells following cytoreductive surgery with minimal exposure to surrounding tissues because radiation-sensitive structures can be displaced away from the treatment fields. Indeed, review of the available literature suggests that use of IORT in patients undergoing salvage surgery for recurrent gynecologic cancer may improve long-term local control and overall survival (27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38).

The present study reports specifically on the outcomes of a cohort of 22 patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma in whom IORT was added to the treatment armamentarium in an attempt to potentially improve local control and disease-specific survival.

Section snippets

Methods and Materials

Between January 1994 and October 2002, 55 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery and were considered for IORT. Twenty-nine patients underwent surgery but did not receive IORT. The reasons were as follows: 24 patients had extensive intraperitoneal disease; 2 patients had diffusely scattered miliary disease; and 3 patients underwent optimal surgical debulking with wide margins. One patient died from disease before surgical exploration. Twenty-four

Patient characteristics

The mean age of these patients was 57.4 years (range, 37–76). The patients were predominantly Caucasian, with 2 Hispanic patients, 1 African-American, and 1 Asian patient. The majority of patients had been diagnosed with advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma: Stage III/IV = 18, Stage II = 1, Stage I = 2, and unstaged = 1 (Table 1). The predominant histologic subtype was papillary serous in 9 patients, clear cell in 3, endometrioid in 3, mucinous in 2, mixed serous and endometrioid in 1, teratoma

Discussion

With current treatment approaches, many patients with epithelial ovarian cancer initially achieve complete clinical remission. However, despite encouraging response rates of up to 80%, only 47% of patients who are clinically free of disease will have no evidence of disease at second-look laparotomy (40). Approximately half of these patients with a negative second-look surgery will recur and die of their disease (41, 42, 43). Survival is poor, but combined modality salvage therapy may be able to

References (51)

  • M.G. del Carmen et al.

    Intraoperative radiation therapy in the management of gynecologic and genitourinary malignancies

    Surg Oncol Clin N Am

    (2003)
  • G.R. Garton et al.

    Intraoperative radiation therapy in gynecologic cancerThe Mayo Clinic experience

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1993)
  • G.R. Garton et al.

    Intraoperative radiation therapy in gynecologic cancerUpdate of the experience at a single institution

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1997)
  • M.G. del Carmen et al.

    Intraoperative radiation therapy in the treatment of pelvic gynecologic malignanciesA review of 15 cases

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2000)
  • M.L. Gemignani et al.

    Radical surgical resection and high-dose intraoperative radiation therapy (HDR-IORT) in patients with recurrent gynecologic cancers

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2001)
  • R. Martinez-Monge et al.

    Intraoperative radiotherapy in recurrent gynecological cancer

    Radiother Oncol

    (1993)
  • A.A. Konski et al.

    A pilot study investigating intraoperative electron beam irradiation in the treatment of ovarian malignancies

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1990)
  • S.C. Rubin et al.

    Prognostic factors for recurrence following negative second-look laparotomy in ovarian cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1991)
  • B. Pothuri et al.

    Palliative surgery for bowel obstruction in recurrent ovarian cancerAn updated series

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2003)
  • D. Gelblum et al.

    Palliative benefit of external-beam radiation in the management of platinum refractory epithelial ovarian carcinoma

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1998)
  • L.F. May et al.

    Palliative benefit of radiation therapy in advanced ovarian cancer

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1990)
  • E.G. Shaw et al.

    Peripheral nerve and ureteral tolerance to intraoperative radiation therapyClinical and dose-response analysis

    Radiother Oncol

    (1990)
  • A.G. Ho et al.

    A reassessment of the role of second-look laparotomy in advanced ovarian cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (1987)
  • B. Lund et al.

    Prognostic factors for outcome of and survival after second-look laparotomy in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1990)
  • R.F. Ozols et al.

    Randomized phase III study of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in optimal stage III epithelial ovarian cancerA Gynecol Oncol Group trial (GOG 158)

    Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol

    (1999)
  • Cited by (31)

    • Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) for gynecologic malignancies

      2015, Gynecologic Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Others have reported similar findings. Using IORT (median 12 Gy) after optimal cytoreductive surgery for isolated recurrent disease, local control in the IORT field was 68% with a median overall survival of 26 months from IORT [38]. Given the propensity of ovarian cancer to recur in the abdomen, intraoperative radiation may be suitable for patients with isolated recurrences, particularly in the retroperitoneal (lymph node) spaces, or in patients with isolated pelvic disease after resection and certain histologic subtypes that may be less sensitive to conventional chemotherapy.

    • Intraoperative Irradiation

      2015, Clinical Radiation Oncology
    • Ovarian Cancer

      2015, Clinical Radiation Oncology
    • Does intra-operative radiation at the time of pelvic exenteration improve survival for patients with recurrent, previously irradiated cervical, vaginal, or vulvar cancer?

      2014, Gynecologic Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In HDR brachytherapy, catheters within a 1 cm thick tissue equivalent material are placed along the tumor bed and a high dose Iridium 192 source is used to deliver the localized radiation. There is data to support that the application of IORT in patients undergoing surgery for recurrent gynecologic malignancies may result in improved long term local control and overall survival [14,16–20,22–27]. The objective of this study is to determine the effect of intraoperative radiation therapy at the time of pelvic exenteration or LEER on survival in patients with recurrent, previously irradiated gynecologic cancers.

    • An innovative tool for intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy simulation and planning: Description and initial evaluation by radiation oncologists

      2012, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The remaining cases included various neoplastic entities and anatomic locations (retroperitoneal sarcoma, pancreas, ovarian and rectal relapse, and Ewing sarcoma). Despite the complexity of these interventions (12–15), the results on most simulations were similar. Considering the successful cases (three breast cancer, three rectal cancer, retroperitoneal sarcoma, and rectal and ovarian monotopic recurrences), the average applicator position difference was 1.2 ± 0.95 cm, with 82.3% of the cases below 2 cm.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text