International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Clinical InvestigationIntensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Sinonasal Tumors: Ghent University Hospital Update
Introduction
Sinonasal tumors (tumors arising from the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses) are a rare, histologically heterogeneous disease accounting for 5% of head-and-neck tumors and <1% of all malignancies 1, 2, 3. Remaining asymptomatic for a long period, most patients often present with locally advanced tumors extending into the neighboring organs and tissues. Local tumor extension in the vicinity of critical organs such as the eyes, optic nerves and chiasm, lacrimal glands, frontal and temporal lobes of the brain, brainstem, and pituitary gland makes treatment of sinonasal tumors extremely challenging. Patients usually undergo surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT). Primary or postoperative conventional RT for sinonasal tumors resulted in a local control and overall survival rate of about 59% and 40% at 5 years, respectively (4), and ≤33% of patients developed radiation-induced blindness 5, 6. The ability of intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) to generate concave dose distributions around the critical structures with a high-dose gradient outside the target underlies our hypothesis that IMRT for sinonasal tumors could minimize dry-eye syndrome and preserve vision without compromising local control. This hypothesis has been tested since 1998, when the first IMRT treatment was performed in the Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital. The proposed IMRT strategy allowed for bilateral sparing of the lacrimal glands and optic structures (i.e., retina, optic nerves, and chiasm) (7) and resulted in avoidance of severe dry-eye syndrome (8) and minimization of visual impairment. Consistent with the greater prescription doses for IMRT-treated patients than for historical controls, greater rates of mid-term local control and survival were achieved compared with those after conventional RT for equal tumor stages (9). This study updates our long-term experience and reports on radiation-induced toxicity, local control, and survival in patients treated with IMRT between July 1998 and November 2006.
Section snippets
Patients
A total of 105 patients with sinonasal tumors were treated with IMRT at the Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital (Table 1), and 84 were included in the analysis because of the histologic type (Table 2). Of 11 patients with local recurrence, the primary tumor had been treated with surgery alone in 6 or in combination with postoperative conventional RT in 5. The site of tumor origin was assumed to be the ethmoid sinus if invaded by adenocarcinoma in patients exposed to
Results
During the early IMRT implementation phase (July 1998 to April 2000), prescription doses of 60–66 Gy in 30–33 fractions were delivered to 9 patients. All subsequent patients were prescribed 70 Gy in 35 fractions, except for 1 patient with local recurrence of esthesioneuroblastoma after postoperative conventional RT who was prescribed 64 Gy in 32 fractions. Of the 84 patients, 81 completed the prescribed treatment. In 3 patients, treatment was terminated early: after 42 Gy because of
Discussion
To our knowledge, our study presents the largest series reporting the treatment outcomes after IMRT for sinonasal tumors. At median follow-up of 40 months, IMRT had resulted in a 5-year actuarial local control and overall survival rate of 70.7% and 58.5%, respectively. Other studies investigating IMRT for sinonasal tumors have had smaller numbers of patients and shorter follow-up periods (Table 8). At a similar duration of follow-up of 39 and 44 months, other investigators 19, 20 reported rates
Conclusion
The IMRT strategy, implemented at Ghent University Hospital for sinonasal tumors, provided an actuarial 5-year local control and overall survival rate of 70.7% and 58.5%, respectively. The low rates of late ocular toxicity demonstrate that IMRT could be considered as the treatment of choice for sinonasal tumors.
Acknowledgments
Professor M. Mareel is acknowledged for fruitful discussions on this and related topics.
References (31)
- et al.
Malignant tumors of the nasal cavity and ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1988) - et al.
An implementation strategy for IMRT of ethmoid sinus cancer with bilateral sparing of the optic pathways
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2001) - et al.
Short term toxicity profile for 32 sinonasal tumors patients treated with IMRT: Can we avoid dry eye syndrome?
Radiother Oncol
(2002) - et al.
An anatomy-based beam segmentation tool for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and its application to head-and-neck cancer
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2001) - et al.
Leaf position optimization for step-and-shoot IMRT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2001) - et al.
In response to Drs. Vaarkamp and Krasin
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2001) - et al.
Carcinomas of the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity treated with radiotherapy at a single institution over five decades: Are we making improvement?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2007) - et al.
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for malignancies of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2007) - et al.
Treatment of nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer with modern radiotherapy techniques in the postoperative setting—The MSKCC experience
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2007) - et al.
Post-operative intensity-modulated radiotherapy for malignancies of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses
Radiother Oncol
(2007)
Dose escalation study of carbon ion radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Visual outcome of accelerated fractionated radiation for advanced sinonasal malignancies employing photons/protons
Radiother Oncol
Preventing radiation retinopathy with hyperfractionation
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Carcinoma of paranasal sinuses: Long-term outcomes with radiotherapy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Results of primary and adjuvant CT-based 3-dimensional radiotherapy for malignant tumors of the paranasal sinuses
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Cited by (0)
Supported by the Belgische Federatie tegen Kanker (Grants 51AC8904, FBC2003/2006, ZKB2747, and SCEI2006-23) and by grants from the Research Foundation–Flanders (Grant G.0183.03), Ghent University (Grants GOA 12050401, BOF 01112300, 011VO497, and 011B3300), and the Centrum voor Studie en Behandeling van Gezwelziekten.
Conflict of interest: none.