Critical Review
Prognostic Cell Biological Markers in Cervical Cancer Patients Primarily Treated With (Chemo)radiation: A Systematic Review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.043Get rights and content

The aim of this study was to systematically review the prognostic and predictive significance of cell biological markers in cervical cancer patients primarily treated with (chemo)radiation. A PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane literature search was performed. Studies describing a relation between a cell biological marker and survival in ≥50 cervical cancer patients primarily treated with (chemo)radiation were selected. Study quality was assessed, and studies with a quality score of 4 or lower were excluded. Cell biological markers were clustered on biological function, and the prognostic and predictive significance of these markers was described. In total, 42 studies concerning 82 cell biological markers were included in this systematic review. In addition to cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-ag) levels, markers associated with poor prognosis were involved in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling (EGFR and C-erbB-2) and in angiogenesis and hypoxia (carbonic anhydrase 9 and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α). Epidermal growth factor receptor and C-erbB-2 were also associated with poor response to (chemo)radiation. In conclusion, EGFR signaling is associated with poor prognosis and response to therapy in cervical cancer patients primarily treated with (chemo)radiation, whereas markers involved in angiogenesis and hypoxia, COX-2, and serum SCC-ag levels are associated with a poor prognosis. Therefore, targeting these pathways in combination with chemoradiation may improve survival in advanced-stage cervical cancer patients.

Introduction

Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignancies among women worldwide (1). Standard treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer is concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation, resulting in a 5-year survival of only 66% (2). Currently, the most important prognostic factors in advanced-stage cervical cancer primarily treated with (chemo)radiation are clinicopathologic factors, including stage and tumor histology (3). Besides clinicopathologic factors, many cell biological markers have been studied in relation to survival and/or response to (chemo)radiation. Especially markers involved in tumorigenesis and tumor progression, such as genes associated with apoptosis, angiogenesis, and cell growth, have been investigated extensively. At the moment the focus of improving survival rates is mainly on targeted therapies in combination with standard chemoradiation (4). Cell biological markers may be helpful to select patients who may benefit from additional treatment and in identifying new potential targets for therapy. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to identify prognostic and predictive cell biological markers in cervical cancer patients primarily treated with (chemo)radiation and to review their potential application in treatment of advanced-stage cervical cancer.

Section snippets

Search strategy

A PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane literature search was performed on March 1, 2010, to identify studies on prognostic cell biological markers in cervical cancer. Medical Subject Heading terms used for the primary search were “uterine cervical neoplasm,” “biological markers,” “genes neoplasm,” “neoplasm proteins,” “prognosis,” and “tumor marker.” References from included reviews were also hand-searched to identify missing relevant publications. The total number of identified publications was 1590

Results

In total, 42 studies concerning 82 cell biological markers were selected for this systematic review. In univariate analysis 34 cell biological markers showed a relation with survival, and 27 were independently associated with survival. In the next subsections the prognostic significance of these cell biological markers will be described. Details of all studies that were included in this systematic review are given in Table E1.

Discussion

This systematic review summarizes the prognostic and predictive value of cell biological markers in cervical cancer patients primarily treated with (chemo)radiation. Clusters with the strongest prognostic factors consist of markers involved in angiogenesis and hypoxia and markers involved in the EGFR pathway. Furthermore, COX-2 immunostaining and serum SCC-ag levels seem to be prognostic markers. Besides the prognostic significance, associations with response to (chemo)radiation were also

References (74)

  • N.H. Cho et al.

    P63 and EGFR as prognostic predictors in stage IIB radiation-treated cervical squamous cell carcinoma

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2003)
  • U. Raju et al.

    Inhibition of DNA repair as a mechanism of enhanced radioresponse of head and neck carcinoma cells by a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, celecoxib

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2005)
  • Y.B. Kim et al.

    Differential cyclooxygenase-2 expression in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2004)
  • K. Liang et al.

    The epidermal growth factor receptor mediates radioresistance

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2003)
  • L. Milas et al.

    Epidermal growth factor receptor and tumor response to radiation: In vivo preclinical studies

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2004)
  • C.M. Lee et al.

    Correlation between human epidermal growth factor receptor family (EGFR, HER2, HER3, HER4), phosphorylated Akt (P-Akt), and clinical outcomes after radiation therapy in carcinoma of the cervix

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2005)
  • J.H. Hong et al.

    The prognostic significance of pre- and posttreatment SCC levels in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix treated by radiotherapy

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1998)
  • J. Dickson et al.

    Pretreatment plasma TGF beta 1 levels are prognostic for survival but not morbidity following radiation therapy of carcinoma of the cervix

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2000)
  • G. Ferrandina et al.

    Expression of class III beta tubulin in cervical cancer patients administered preoperative radiochemotherapy: Correlation with response to treatment and clinical outcome

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2007)
  • G.Y. Kwon et al.

    Role of CD24 protein in predicting metastatic potential of uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma in patients treated with radiotherapy

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2007)
  • Y. Suzuki et al.

    Progesterone receptor is a favorable prognostic factor of radiation therapy for adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2000)
  • F.G. Herrera et al.

    A prospective phase I-II trial of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib in patients with carcinoma of the cervix with biomarker assessment of the tumor microenvironment

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2007)
  • D.K. Gaffney et al.

    Efficacy and patterns of failure for locally advanced cancer of the cervix treated with Celebrex (celecoxib) and chemoradiotherapy in RTOG 0128

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2007)
  • A. Gadducci et al.

    The serum assay of tumour markers in the prognostic evaluation, treatment monitoring and follow-up of patients with cervical cancer: A review of the literature

    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol

    (2008)
  • Y. Harima et al.

    Identification of genes associated with progression and metastasis of advanced cervical cancers after radiotherapy by cDNA microarray analysis

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2009)
  • Y. Harima et al.

    Prediction of outcome of advanced cervical cancer to thermoradiotherapy according to expression profiles of 35 genes selected by cDNA microarray analysis

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2004)
  • Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. In...
  • Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: Individual patient data meta-analysis

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2010)
  • M.G. Noordhuis et al.

    Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and activated EGFR predict poor response to (chemo)radiation and survival in cervical cancer

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2009)
  • L.M. McShane et al.

    REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK)

    Br J Cancer

    (2005)
  • D.F. Hayes et al.

    Tumor marker utility grading system: A framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1996)
  • D. Liao et al.

    Hypoxia: A key regulator of angiogenesis in cancer

    Cancer Metastasis Rev

    (2007)
  • P. Michieli

    Hypoxia, angiogenesis and cancer therapy: To breathe or not to breathe?

    Cell Cycle

    (2009)
  • B. Bachtiary et al.

    Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha indicates diminished response to radiotherapy and unfavorable prognosis in patients receiving radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2003)
  • G.J. Hutchison et al.

    Hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha expression as an intrinsic marker of hypoxia: Correlation with tumor oxygen, pimonidazole measurements, and outcome in locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2004)
  • T. Kawanaka et al.

    Prognostic significance of HIF-2alpha expression on tumor infiltrating macrophages in patients with uterine cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy

    J Med Invest

    (2008)
  • J.Y. Kim et al.

    Tumor-associated carbonic anhydrases are linked to metastases in primary cervical cancer

    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol

    (2006)
  • Cited by (74)

    • Change in Patterns of Failure After Image-Guided Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer: Analysis From the RetroEMBRACE Study

      2019, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Reliance on conventional prognostic factors such as FIGO stage and pelvic nodal status to select patients for prophylactic PAN RT or adjuvant systemic treatment may therefore be insufficient. In recent years, there have been reports of promising imaging, immunohistochemical, and serum biomarkers for early prediction of treatment response for cervical cancer.14,15 For example, positron emission tomography–CT,16 dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI,17 and diffusion-weighted MRI18 before or during chemo-RT have all been reported to correlate with local control and survival.

    • Glut-1 expression in small cervical biopsies is prognostic in cervical cancers treated with chemoradiation

      2017, Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, post-therapy FDG-PET is unable to inform the design of investigations or therapeutic interventions before or during treatment. There have been numerous putative pathobiological prognostic factors studied, including factors involving the angiogenesis, hypoxia, epidermal growth factor receptor and COX-2 pathways [8]. We set out to assess the prognostic significance of biomarkers for metabolism (glucose transporter-1 [Glut-1]), proliferation (Ki-67) and hypoxia (hypoxia-inducible factor-1α [Hif-1α] and carbonic anhydrase IX [CA-9]) in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflict of interest: none.

    View full text