International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Physics ContributionDo We Need Daily Image-Guided Radiotherapy by Megavoltage Computed Tomography in Head and Neck Helical Tomotherapy? The Actual Delivered Dose to the Spinal Cord
Introduction
Many head and neck cancer patients (HNpts) experience anatomical changes throughout the course of radiation therapy due to tumor and soft tissue shrinkage and body weight loss. These have an impact on patient setup and delivered dose (1). As intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) provides a steep dose falloff to normal tissue and organs at risk, the accuracy of the daily setup of patients is essential. This is especially true with regard to the spinal cord, where exceeding the tolerance dose could be extremely harmful. Several studies of the changes in delivered doses to the spinal cord during fractionated radiotherapy due to soft tissue changes are available. However their findings are not consistent: either no changes or increases up to 15 Gy were reported 2, 3, 4, 5. Furthermore, these studies were carried out with new planning kV computed tomography (kVCT), performed at predefined times. These kVCTs were rigidly registered by bony landmarks to the initial planning kVCT and did not take the actual position of the patient on the treatment table into account. Thus, they do not answer the question of how much actual dose was delivered to the spinal cord, as delivered in the treatment position. Knowledge of the actual delivered dose and recommendations for image-guided RT (IGRT)-based treatments are extremely important, as two trends can be observed currently in IMRT and IGRT for HNpts: dose escalation (e.g., by simultaneous integrated boost) and reirradiation.
This work focused on radiotherapy to the spinal cord only. We investigated the impact of setup uncertainties and morphological changes on the delivered dose to the spinal cord throughout the course of head and neck tomotherapy, with daily, twice weekly, or once weekly image-guidance by megavoltage CT (MVCTs) scans and without any image guidance at all. Furthermore, this study addressed additional open questions regarding the actual delivered dose to the spinal cord during fractionated head and neck IGRT: for example, is every fraction affected by an increase in dose compared to the initial plan; is the volume affected by a dose increase different from approach to approach; and is there a trend regarding the affected regions?
Section snippets
Patient characteristics
We analyzed 20 HNpts treated with helical tomotherapy (HT) (TomoTherapy Inc., Madison, WI) at our institution. The cohort consisted of 10 nasopharynx cancer patients who received definitive radiotherapy and 10 tonsil cancer patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy. Sixteen patients underwent concomitant platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. Table 1 shows the patients’ characteristics.
Treatment planning and delivery
We previously described treatment planning and delivery of HT for HNpts treated in our clinic (1). Briefly,
Results
The absolute overall setup errors of the analyzed directions and the 3D vector absolute setup error are presented in Table 2. Assessment of setup errors when setup direction error was taken into account revealed no statistically significant differences to the zero position for longitudinal (mean difference, 0.13 mm; 95% CI, −0.57 to 0.83; p = 0.714), vertical (mean difference, 0.36 mm; 95% CI, −0.41 to 1.14; p = 0.359), and lateral (mean difference, −0.75mm; 95% CI, −0.65 to 0.50; p = 0.800)
Discussion
In our study, the overall magnitude of the 3D vector and the magnitude of translational and rotational setup errors were within previously reported tomotherapy setup errors 9, 10, 11. No systematic translational setup errors were observed. However, we detected a small (<1°) systematic clockwise rotation error. This can be explained by the standardized procedure of setup of patients in our clinic: the setup is performed by a single technician, by fastening the mask of the patient first on the
Conclusions
The Dmax delivered to the myelon during fractionated radiotherapy of HNpts is different than the planned dose. The proportion of fractions affected by a higher-than-planned dose, the magnitude of the dose increase, and the volumes of the myelon affected by a higher-than-planned dose were less pronounced for dIGRT. We strongly recommend daily IGRT if patients are treated with doses close to the known tolerance dose of the spinal cord. For all other cases, twice weekly IGRT is sufficient.
References (16)
- et al.
Comparative analysis of an image-guided versus a non-image-guided setup approach in terms of delivered dose to the parotid glands in head-and-neck cancer IMRT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2010) - et al.
Weekly volume and dosimetric changes during chemoradiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: A prospective observational study
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2010) - et al.
Repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2006) - et al.
Spatial and dosimetric variability of organs at risk in head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2007) - et al.
Adaptive replanning strategies accounting for shrinkage in head and neck IMRT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2009) - et al.
Proposal for the delineation of the nodal CTV in the node-positive and the post-operative neck
Radiother Oncol
(2006) - et al.
Determination and delineation of nodal target volumes for head-and-neck cancer based on patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2002) - et al.
Comparison of setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks for the treatment of brain and head and neck tumors
Radiother Oncol
(2001)
Cited by (18)
Anatomical change during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer, and its effect on delivered dose to the spinal cord
2019, Radiotherapy and OncologyCitation Excerpt :This leads to the second point, that dosimetric differences are likely to be random, with minimal impact from systematic error [6]. Finally, most importantly, and based on our simulation of DA in the absence of IG and the logic of Duma et al [15], we suggest that our policy of DIPC is crucial to the small differences we report. This is the largest analysis of differences between planned and delivered spinal cord dose in patients undergoing curative radiotherapy for HNC.
Current status of IMRT in head and neck cancer
2013, Reports of Practical Oncology and RadiotherapyCitation Excerpt :Although MVCT images have a lower contrast than KV-CT, their quality are sufficient for setup verification and tumour identification. Although the optimal frequency of image registration has not been defined, patient setup can be improved if daily imaging is performed.30 The major components of the HT process comprise 3D imaging generated by conventional CT; definitions of target volumes and organs at risk (OARs); optimized HT planning; creation of verification data and phantom irradiation; transfer of planning data to the treatment unit; pre-treatment MVCT; corrections of patient setup if needed; treatment delivery; and, optionally, dose reconstruction.
Regional cumulative maximum dose to the spinal cord in head-and-neck cancer: Considerations for re-irradiation
2013, Radiotherapy and OncologyCitation Excerpt :Without the information from our software tool, the physician viewing the old treatment plan should be aware that within 5–10 cm of the calculated maximum, there may be the true maximum with an additional dose increase of up to 13%. In a similar study, a comparable increase of dose was observed [14]. However, attention must be paid when comparing the results of both studies.
Accuracy evaluation of image guided therapy for middle thoracic esophageal cancer
2022, Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
Conflict of interest: none.