Clinical Investigation
Salvage Stereotactic Reirradiation With or Without Cetuximab for Locally Recurrent Head-and-Neck Cancer: A Feasibility Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.054Get rights and content

Purpose

Normal tissues tolerance limits the use of reirradiation for recurrent head-and-neck cancers (HNC). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) could offer precise irradiation while sparing healthy tissues. Results of a feasibility study using SBRT with or without cetuximab are reported for reirradiation of recurrent primary HNC.

Methods and Materials

Patients with inoperable recurrent, or new primary tumor, in a previously irradiated area were included. Reirradiation dose was 36 Gy in six fractions of 6 Gy to the 85% isodose line covering 95% of the planning target volume. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma received concomitant cetuximab.

Results

Between June 2007 and January 2010, 40 patients were prospectively treated for 43 lesions. Median age was 60 and median tumor size was 29 mm. Fifteen patients received concomitant cetuximab and 1 received concomitant cisplatin. Median follow-up was 25.6 months with 34 patients evaluable for tumor response. Median overall survival was 13.6 months and response rate was 79.4% (15 complete and 12 partial responses). Grade 3 toxicity occurred in 4 patients.

Conclusion

These results suggest that short SBRT with or without cetuximab is an effective salvage treatment with good response rate in this poor prognosis population with previously irradiated HNC. Treatment is feasible and, with appropriate care to limiting critical structure, acute toxicities are acceptable. A prospective multicenter Phase II trial of SRT and concomitant cetuximab in recurrent HNC squamous cell carcinoma is ongoing.

Introduction

Treatment of advanced, Stage III–IV, head-and-neck cancers (HNC) usually involves a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Yet nearly 50% of patients present with a local relapse or second primary in previously irradiated tissues 1, 2, 3, 4. For these patients, surgery remains the treatment of choice 5, 6, but is very often difficult to perform with curative intent (<15% of patients). Consequently, these patients receive palliative treatment such as best possible supportive care or chemotherapy, resulting in a median survival time of less than 1 year. Reirradiation is another option, but the applicability of curative-intent reirradiation has been limited by the dose tolerance of nearby critical structures (e.g., bone, spinal cord). Developments in the field of radiation oncology, such as three-dimensional treatment planning and intensity-modulated radiation therapy, now make it possible to reirradiate these patients with limited toxicity and greater precision. However, these treatments are mostly delivered with conventional fractionation schedules (2 Gy/fraction) resulting in long overall treatment times and, in some cases, ethical issues for these patients with limited life expectancy.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an attractive treatment modality for HNC reirradiation because it is delivered with a very high precision. One potential advantage with SBRT is the ability to deliver the dose with multiple small beams (>150 per treatment) with good skin tolerance and smaller irradiated volumes, and may allow the use of a hypofractionated scheme. Even if there is no demonstrated biological advantage using hypofractionation in recurrent HNC, there is a major clinical advantage in keeping the overall treatment time short in a population with a poor clinical prognosis. Altogether, we considered that the combination of precision, small irradiated volumes with multiple small beans, and short overall treatment time might significantly increase the therapeutic ratio (local control/morbidity) in this patient population.

Another consideration in the treatment of recurrent HNC is the use of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Recently, the role of targeted therapies has been demonstrated in the treatment of advanced tumors combined with radiation or as a single treatment modality in the palliation of advanced recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck disease 7, 8. Furthermore, there is a strong preclinical background to consider the use of anti epidermal growth factor receptor molecules when treating tumors growing that are growing in already irradiated tissues (tumor bed effect) (9).

Combining radiation-based treatment with targeted therapies has the advantage of minimal acute toxicity, with the exception of an acceptable skin rash for patients with short life expectancy.

In 2007, a feasibility study using SRT reirradiation (combined with targeted therapy using cetuximab) was undertaken in 40 patients with the intent of offering a short, nontoxic, intensive treatment for local control of recurrent head-and-neck tumors.

Section snippets

Patient selection

Patients with recurrent head-and-neck tumors treated at the Oscar Lambret Cancer Centre between June 2007 and January 2010 were prospectively included. The protocol was approved by the institutional review board and patients signed inform consent. All recurrences or new primaries were considered inoperable and occurred in a previously irradiated area (size ≤65 mm). Imaging evaluation was based on computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the tumors were biopsied when

Patients

A total of 40 patients were treated for 43 lesions between June 2007 and January 2010, 25 of which (62.5%) were men. Median age was 60 (range, 24–78). All patients received previous radiotherapy in the area of the new lesion with a median dose of 66 Gy. In addition, 70% had undergone previous surgery and 57% previous chemotherapy during their initial treatment. Median time between initial treatment and retreatment was 31.6 months (range, 7.9–263.4 months). A total of 20 (50%) tumors were

Discussion

Locally advanced head-and-neck tumors are primarily treated with a multimodality regimen, including combinations of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Despite this, nearly 50% of patients present with local relapse or a second primary at previously treated anatomical sites 1, 2, 3, 4. For these patients, surgery remains the treatment of choice but remains difficult and preformed in only a minority of patients. Taussky et al. have reported on the treatment of 297 patients, 26% (75

Conclusion

Stereotactic salvage radiotherapy combined with targeted therapy is a potential alternative to salvage surgery in selected patients. Our results show that the treatment is feasible and, with appropriate attention to limiting critical structure dose, acute toxicities are acceptable. In addition, the short overall treatment time makes SBRT treatment acceptable for patients with poor overall prognosis. Follow-up of a prospective Phase II study combining SBRT and cetuximab in recurrent

References (40)

  • J.K. Salama et al.

    Long-term outcome of concurrent chemotherapy and reirradiation for recurrent and second primary head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2006)
  • E.P. Sulman et al.

    IMRT reirradiation of head and neck cancer—disease control and morbidity outcomes

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2009)
  • N. Lee et al.

    Salvage re-irradiation for recurrent head and neck cancer

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2007)
  • D.T. Chua et al.

    Stereotactic radiosurgery versus gold grain implantation in salvaging local failures of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2007)
  • S.X. Wu et al.

    Outcome of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for 90 patients with locally persistent and recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2007)
  • K.W. Roh et al.

    Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy as reirradiation for locally recurrent head and neck cancer

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2009)
  • K.R. Unger et al.

    Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for reirradiation of head-and-neck cancer

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2010)
  • E.E. Cohen et al.

    Phase I trial of tirapazamine, cisplatin, and concurrent accelerated boost reirradiation in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2007)
  • M.W. McDonald et al.

    ACR appropriateness criteria retreatment of recurrent head and neck cancer after prior definitive radiation

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2011)
  • A.A. Forastiere et al.

    Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2003)
  • Cited by (88)

    • Evolving multidisciplinary treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in India<sup>✰</sup>

      2021, Cancer Treatment and Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      In Indian scenario also, concurrent radiation and chemotherapy has become standard of care as “solemodality” of treatment or in high risk post operative patients of LAHNC. Gollin and Johnson (1971) compared patients who received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) intra-arterially before RT with patients who received RT alone [42]. CT resulted in good tumor regression but not in an increase in survival.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflict of interest: E.F. Lartigau is a member of the Accuray’s Clinical Advisory Board.

    View full text