Physics Contribution
Normal Liver Tissue Density Dose Response in Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Metastases

Preliminary results were presented at the Joint American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM)/Canadian Organization of Medical Physicists (COMP) meeting, Vancouver, Canada, July 31-August 4 2011, and at the 10th Annual Meeting of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) of Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Honolulu, HI, December 18-21, 2011.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.04.041Get rights and content

Purpose

To evaluate the temporal dose response of normal liver tissue for patients with liver metastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Methods and Materials

Ninety-nine noncontrast follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans of 34 patients who received SBRT between 2004 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed at a median of 8 months post-SBRT (range, 0.7-36 months). SBRT-induced normal liver tissue density changes in follow-up CT scans were evaluated at 2, 6, 10, 15, and 27 months. The dose distributions from planning CTs were mapped to follow-up CTs to relate the mean Hounsfield unit change (ΔHU) to dose received over the range 0-55 Gy in 3-5 fractions. An absolute density change of 7 HU was considered a significant radiographic change in normal liver tissue.

Results

Increasing radiation dose was linearly correlated with lower post-SBRT liver tissue density (slope, −0.65 ΔHU/5 Gy). The threshold for significant change (−7 ΔHU) was observed in the range of 30-35 Gy. This effect did not vary significantly over the time intervals evaluated.

Conclusions

SBRT induces a dose-dependent and relatively time-independent hypodense radiation reaction within normal liver tissue that is characterized by a decrease of >7 HU in liver density for doses >30-35 Gy.

Introduction

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a form of external beam radiation treatment that uses advanced planning, delivery, and localization techniques to achieve steep dose falloff from target to surrounding healthy tissue. Constraining high-dose distribution enables delivery of 40-60 Gy in 5 or fewer fractions and limits potential toxicity to normal liver tissue 1, 2. Clinical studies have reported local control of up to 95% at 2 years 2, 3. Although occurrences of severe toxicity are rare (4), radiation-induced density changes, which could relate to local liver injuries, are often observed on follow-up CT scans 5, 6. The reaction manifests as a hypodense region surrounding the target volume and is aligned with lower-than-prescription isodose lines 5, 6. The reaction is different from that seen in other organs, for example, the lung (7), so a specific understanding of the processes occurring following SBRT to the liver is needed.

Multiphasic CT scans have been used to explain the damage to the liver. Herfarth et al (5) analyzed single-fraction stereotactic RT in 36 patients treated for liver malignancies and identified 3 focal reaction types based on density behaviors seen in the precontrast, portal-venous, and late phases. Notably, a shift from hypodensity to hyperdensity in the portal venous phase implied acute effects manifesting as chronic effects. In the acute phase, congestion of the sinusoids with erythrocytes reduces blood flow, giving way to a hypodense appearance. Edema and fatty infiltration similarly give way to a hypodense appearance in noncontrast CT scans. In the chronic phase, vascular obstruction (progressive fibrin deposition in the central veins and afferent sinusoids) causes a sustained, hyperdense appearance in the portal venous phase. Importantly, these microscopic changes and their macroscopic impact on liver density values have been histologically proven 8, 9.

Irradiated regions depicted in noncontrast CTs tend to reveal only a trend toward various degrees of hypodensity (although it has been suggested that chronic injury can cause decreased fatty replacement resulting in hyperdensity (9). Nonetheless, noncontrast scans are necessary to quantify actual density changes. Sixty-one of the 95 noncontrast scans presented by Herfarth et al (5) demonstrated a mean change in Hounsfield units (ΔHU) of −15 ΔHU (range, −10 to −30 ΔHU) between irradiated and nonirradiated regions. In a separate study, Ahmadi et al (10) showed that 27 of the 40 noncontrast scans obtained after proton therapy showed an area of lower density, averaging 41.2 ± 5.4 HU, significantly lower than the surrounding nonirradiated tissue, averaging 49.2 ± 6.1 HU (10).

None of these studies provided extensive dose response modeling of normal liver tissue in SBRT patients by using CT density changes within the reaction volume and surrounding tissue. Consequently, we have undertaken an image-based, computational approach using ΔHU in order to quantify SBRT-induced liver density changes as a function of dose and time from treatment.

Section snippets

Patients

Thirty-four patients treated between 2004 and 2011 with SBRT for liver metastases were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were selected based upon the availability of planning CTs and follow-up CTs without contrast and the requirements that treated lesions were locally controlled and in-field recurrences were not detected in follow-up imaging. A total of 99 follow-up noncontrast CTs were analyzed. Between 1 and 8 post-treatment CT scans (median, 2) were obtained for each patient, including 9

Significant change in liver density

We calculated an RMS of ∼3.5 HU for normal, nonirradiated liver tissue. Therefore, we defined 7 HU as the threshold beyond which constitutes a radiographic change in liver CT density. A power calculation (α = 5%; β = 20%) for when to decide whether a change in 7 HU was considered significant revealed that n=5 was the minimum number of scans, when σ = 5.7 HU (15).

Normal liver tissue dose response

Figure 2 shows a typical patient's planning CT and 4 registered follow-up CT scans at 4, 5, 7, and 8 months. Also shown in these scans

Discussion

Several studies of the effects of conventional RT, 3D conformal RT, and SBRT to the normal liver have reported the appearance of a radiologically hypodense region in follow-up noncontrast CT scans 5, 6, 17, 18, 19. Of the 95 follow-up noncontrast scans analyzed in the study by Herfarth et al (5), 61 scans showed hypodense radiation reactions, 32 showed no difference, and 2 showed hyperdense reactions. Of the 21 noncontrast CT scans reviewed by Chiou et al (19), all scans revealed either a

Conclusions

SBRT induces a dose-dependent and relatively time-independent hypodense radiation reaction within normal liver tissue. A 7-HU (or greater) hypodense change in liver density, likely to be associated with hepatic injury, occurs with doses above 30-35 Gy. This change is linearly related to dose.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (19)

  • Evaluating dose constraints for radiation induced liver damage following magnetic resonance image guided Stereotactic Body radiotherapy

    2021, Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thus, it appears that our approach of correlating the liver damage region using dice coefficient can help in determining appropriate time for obtaining follow up scans. In the studies that quantified radiation changes using either Hounsfield Unit differences on follow-up CT scans or intensity changes on follow up MRI scans, imaging changes were associated with lower isodose lines in the range of 25 Gy–42 Gy [14]. Takeda et al. [15] analyzed follow up CT scans and proposed using 30 Gy in 5 fractions as a threshold dose.

  • Regional Radiation Dose-Response Modeling of Functional Liver in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients With Longitudinal Sulfur Colloid SPECT/CT: A Proof of Concept

    2018, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Future precision medicine clinical trials could selectively assign patients to functional image-guided RT regimens based on their predicted liver sensitivity to radiation. Normal liver dose-response studies have traditionally focused on radiobiological modeling with serial CT imaging (31) or qualitative changes in longitudinal planar scintigraphy (32), which revealed dose thresholds for significant radiographic or scintigraphic changes at 30 to 35 Gy under variable fractionation schemes. These trends were averaged over patient populations, which provided improved statistical power but did not account for interpatient and intrapatient variability in liver sensitivity to radiation.

  • Early Prediction of Acute Xerostomia During Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer Based on Texture Analysis of Daily CT

    2018, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Recently, it has been reported based on an analysis of the daily computed tomographies (CTs) collected during RT for HNC that the mean CT number (MCTN), measured in Hounsfield Units (HU), in tumors and certain organs at risk can change during a course of RT (11). Similar MCTN changes have also been observed in lung, liver, or pancreas tumors and certain organs at risk during or after RT (12-17). It is highly desirable to identify metrics to predict radiation-induced acute xerostomia during the early phase of RT delivery for HNC so that treatment management can be altered if necessary.

  • Changes in liver volume observed following sorafenib and liver radiation therapy

    2016, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
  • Computed tomography number changes observed during computed tomography-guided radiation therapy for head and neck cancer

    2015, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thalacker et al (19) observed that the CTN of white matter was reduced by 5 HU after brain irradiation. Compared with most of these previous studies (5-8, 14-19) reporting CTN changes after RT in selected normal structures according to follow-up CTs after RT, the present study discovers CTN change during the course of RT delivery for HNC for both GTV and OARs. Although CTN changes during and after RT could be measured using various forms of CT (eg, kilovoltage or MV cone-beam CT, MV CT [Tomotherapy CT]), CTN measurement with diagnostic-quality CT (eg, CT-on-rails as used in this work) should be the most accurate.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Conflict of interest: none.

View full text