International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Clinical InvestigationPostoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery Without Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: Potential Role of Preoperative Tumor Size
Introduction
Metastatic disease to the brain is diagnosed in approximately 170,000 patients in the United States each year, making it the most common central nervous system (CNS) tumor in adults 1, 2. Historically, single intracranial metastases often were treated with surgical resection followed by whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) (3). However, recent work has suggested patients may experience neurocognitive impairment even within the first few months after WBRT; and, due to improved outcomes from therapies for systemic cancer, the proportion of patients who survive to develop long-term deficits may be increasing 4, 5. Also, the time, inconvenience, and travel demands of weeks of daily WBRT treatments are unappealing for many patients, and they may wish to defer WBRT to the point when it is most needed. In contrast, several recent reports investigating stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) administered to the resection cavity without WBRT have produced rates of local control that compare favorably with those of initial WBRT, with 1-year local control rates ranging from 74%-100% 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14.
Our study is a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients who underwent surgical resection of intracranial metastases followed by linear accelerator (LINAC)-based SRS. We assessed various potential prognostic factors for disease control and survival, including the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) score (15). The range of doses applied to a variety of target cavity sizes, the analysis of preoperative tumor size as well as target volume, and inclusion of the GPA index make this study unique in the literature exploring predictive factors for intracranial disease control and survival for patients undergoing postoperative SRS.
Section snippets
Methods and Materials
We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who underwent LINAC-based SRS to the surgical cavity after initial resection of brain metastases from February 2002 through December 2008, excluding patients who received WBRT prior to or immediately following operative resection. Institutional review board approval was obtained prior to data collection.
Whenever possible, SRS was performed within 4 weeks of surgical resection to minimize time for possible tumor regrowth while providing
Patient demographics
Included in the analysis were 49 lesions in 23 men and 24 women undergoing resection followed by SRS. The median age at SRS was 64 years (range, 24-85 years). The most common primary malignancy was non-small cell lung cancer (23) followed by melanoma (7) and breast cancer (5). Median preoperative tumor volume was 11.5 cm3. Thirty-seven lesions (76%) achieved GTR at surgery. The median KPS at the time of SRS was 80 (range, 50-100). Seven lesions at the time of SRS (14%) had GPA scores of up to
Discussion
Four randomized trials have examined the value of WBRT for the management of brain metastases treated either with surgery or SRS, yet none has shown a survival benefit with the addition of WBRT 4, 6, 17, 18. Furthermore, WBRT has been associated with some short- and long-term adverse effects, including declines in learning and memory functions (4).
Postoperative SRS as substitute for WBRT has been explored in several recent retrospective series, with 1-year actuarial local control rates varying
Conclusions
Overall, in this retrospective series, resection followed by SRS to the surgical cavity produced excellent local control rates. Preoperative tumor size but not target volume proved significantly associated with local control and with time to intracranial DR but not with OS. We conclude that postoperative SRS, initially deferring WBRT, is an effective treatment of brain metastases, especially in patients presenting with smaller tumors. Close radiological follow-up is recommended for the early
References (20)
- et al.
Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial
Lancet Oncol
(2009) - et al.
Resection followed by stereotactic radiosurgery to resection cavity for intracranial metastases
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2009) - et al.
Stereotactic radiosurgery of the postoperative resection cavity for brain metastases
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2008) - et al.
Stereotactic irradiation of the postoperative resection cavity for brain metastasis: a frameless linear accelerator-based case series and review of the technique
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2012) - et al.
A new prognostic index and comparison to three other indices for patients with brain metastases: an analysis of 1,960 patients in the RTOG database
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2008) - et al.
Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial
Lancet
(2004) - et al.
An era of rapid advancement: diagnosis and treatment of metastatic brain cancer
Neurosurgery
(2005) - et al.
Radiation therapy for brain metastases
Ann Neurol
(1980) Current treatment approaches to surgery for brain metastases
Neurosurgery
(2005)- et al.
Central nervous system metastases in HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab: incidence, survival, and risk factors
Oncologist
(2007)
Cited by (85)
Efficacy of hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery in treating surgical beds of metastatic brain tumors
2024, Journal of Clinical NeurosciencePreoperative Versus Postoperative Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases: A Meta-Analysis
2024, World NeurosurgerySensitizing brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery using hyperbaric oxygen: A proof-of-principle study
2022, Radiotherapy and OncologyRisk Factors of Second Local Recurrence in Surgically Treated Recurrent Brain Metastases: An Exploratory Analysis
2022, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :The choice of treatment modality for newly diagnosed BMs mainly relies on the BM size and symptoms at patient presentation.33,34 In the neurosurgical literature, larger BM size, defined as BMs >3 cm, has been shown to increase the first local recurrence odds in patients with newly diagnosed BMs receiving resection and adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery.35,36 Therefore, the observed association of worse second local recurrence prognosis for patients receiving both resection and radiation for newly diagnosed BMs might be explained by initial BM size and thus shorter progression-free survival.
Timing of Adjuvant Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery Affects Local Control of Resected Brain Metastases
2021, Practical Radiation OncologyCitation Excerpt :In contrast, in the Stanford experience and in our cohort, equivalent dose was not predictive of LR.15 Some studies have identified larger tumor or resection cavity size as predictive of LC, with 2.0 cm to 3.0 cm commonly cited as a threshold.10-12,28 In this study, as in the Stanford experience, increased target volume was not found to be predictive of LR.15
Hypofractionated adjuvant surgical cavity radiotherapy following resection of limited brain metastasis
2020, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Conflict of interest: none.