Clinical Investigation
Postoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery Without Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: Potential Role of Preoperative Tumor Size

Presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), in San Diego, CA, October 21-November 4, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.05.027Get rights and content

Purpose

Radiation therapy following resection of a brain metastasis increases the probability of disease control at the surgical site. We analyzed our experience with postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as an alternative to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), with an emphasis on identifying factors that might predict intracranial disease control and overall survival (OS).

Methods and Materials

We retrospectively reviewed all patients through December 2008, who, after surgical resection, underwent SRS to the tumor bed, deferring WBRT. Multiple factors were analyzed for time to intracranial recurrence (ICR), whether local recurrence (LR) at the surgical bed or “distant” recurrence (DR) in the brain, for time to WBRT, and for OS.

Results

A total of 49 lesions in 47 patients were treated with postoperative SRS. With median follow-up of 9.3 months (range, 1.1-61.4 months), local control rates at the resection cavity were 85.5% at 1 year and 66.9% at 2 years. OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 52.5% and 31.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis (preoperative) tumors larger than 3.0 cm exhibited a significantly shorter time to LR. At a cutoff of 2.0 cm, larger tumors resulted in significantly shorter times not only for LR but also for DR, ICR, and salvage WBRT. While multivariate Cox regressions showed preoperative size to be significant for times to DR, ICR, and WBRT, in similar multivariate analysis for OS, only the graded prognostic assessment proved to be significant. However, the number of intracranial metastases at presentation was not significantly associated with OS nor with other outcome variables.

Conclusions

Larger tumor size was associated with shorter time to recurrence and with shorter time to salvage WBRT; however, larger tumors were not associated with decrements in OS, suggesting successful salvage. SRS to the tumor bed without WBRT is an effective treatment for resected brain metastases, achieving local control particularly for tumors up to 3.0 cm diameter.

Introduction

Metastatic disease to the brain is diagnosed in approximately 170,000 patients in the United States each year, making it the most common central nervous system (CNS) tumor in adults 1, 2. Historically, single intracranial metastases often were treated with surgical resection followed by whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) (3). However, recent work has suggested patients may experience neurocognitive impairment even within the first few months after WBRT; and, due to improved outcomes from therapies for systemic cancer, the proportion of patients who survive to develop long-term deficits may be increasing 4, 5. Also, the time, inconvenience, and travel demands of weeks of daily WBRT treatments are unappealing for many patients, and they may wish to defer WBRT to the point when it is most needed. In contrast, several recent reports investigating stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) administered to the resection cavity without WBRT have produced rates of local control that compare favorably with those of initial WBRT, with 1-year local control rates ranging from 74%-100% 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14.

Our study is a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients who underwent surgical resection of intracranial metastases followed by linear accelerator (LINAC)-based SRS. We assessed various potential prognostic factors for disease control and survival, including the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) score (15). The range of doses applied to a variety of target cavity sizes, the analysis of preoperative tumor size as well as target volume, and inclusion of the GPA index make this study unique in the literature exploring predictive factors for intracranial disease control and survival for patients undergoing postoperative SRS.

Section snippets

Methods and Materials

We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who underwent LINAC-based SRS to the surgical cavity after initial resection of brain metastases from February 2002 through December 2008, excluding patients who received WBRT prior to or immediately following operative resection. Institutional review board approval was obtained prior to data collection.

Whenever possible, SRS was performed within 4 weeks of surgical resection to minimize time for possible tumor regrowth while providing

Patient demographics

Included in the analysis were 49 lesions in 23 men and 24 women undergoing resection followed by SRS. The median age at SRS was 64 years (range, 24-85 years). The most common primary malignancy was non-small cell lung cancer (23) followed by melanoma (7) and breast cancer (5). Median preoperative tumor volume was 11.5 cm3. Thirty-seven lesions (76%) achieved GTR at surgery. The median KPS at the time of SRS was 80 (range, 50-100). Seven lesions at the time of SRS (14%) had GPA scores of up to

Discussion

Four randomized trials have examined the value of WBRT for the management of brain metastases treated either with surgery or SRS, yet none has shown a survival benefit with the addition of WBRT 4, 6, 17, 18. Furthermore, WBRT has been associated with some short- and long-term adverse effects, including declines in learning and memory functions (4).

Postoperative SRS as substitute for WBRT has been explored in several recent retrospective series, with 1-year actuarial local control rates varying

Conclusions

Overall, in this retrospective series, resection followed by SRS to the surgical cavity produced excellent local control rates. Preoperative tumor size but not target volume proved significantly associated with local control and with time to intracranial DR but not with OS. We conclude that postoperative SRS, initially deferring WBRT, is an effective treatment of brain metastases, especially in patients presenting with smaller tumors. Close radiological follow-up is recommended for the early

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (85)

  • Risk Factors of Second Local Recurrence in Surgically Treated Recurrent Brain Metastases: An Exploratory Analysis

    2022, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    The choice of treatment modality for newly diagnosed BMs mainly relies on the BM size and symptoms at patient presentation.33,34 In the neurosurgical literature, larger BM size, defined as BMs >3 cm, has been shown to increase the first local recurrence odds in patients with newly diagnosed BMs receiving resection and adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery.35,36 Therefore, the observed association of worse second local recurrence prognosis for patients receiving both resection and radiation for newly diagnosed BMs might be explained by initial BM size and thus shorter progression-free survival.

  • Timing of Adjuvant Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery Affects Local Control of Resected Brain Metastases

    2021, Practical Radiation Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In contrast, in the Stanford experience and in our cohort, equivalent dose was not predictive of LR.15 Some studies have identified larger tumor or resection cavity size as predictive of LC, with 2.0 cm to 3.0 cm commonly cited as a threshold.10-12,28 In this study, as in the Stanford experience, increased target volume was not found to be predictive of LR.15

View all citing articles on Scopus

Conflict of interest: none.

View full text