Clinical Investigation
Clinical–Pathologic Stage Discrepancy in Bladder Cancer Patients Treated With Radical Cystectomy: Results From the National Cancer Data Base

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.001Get rights and content

Purpose

To examine the accuracy of clinical staging and its effects on outcome in bladder cancer (BC) patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC), using a large national database.

Methods and Materials

A total of 16,953 patients with BC without distant metastases treated with RC from 1998 to 2009 were analyzed. Factors associated with clinical–pathologic stage discrepancy were assessed by multivariate generalized estimating equation models. Survival analysis was conducted for patients treated between 1998 and 2004 (n=7270) using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

At RC 41.9% of patients were upstaged, whereas 5.9% were downstaged. Upstaging was more common in females, the elderly, and in patients who underwent a more extensive lymphadenectomy. Downstaging was less common in patients treated at community centers, in the elderly, and in Hispanics. Receipt of preoperative chemotherapy was highly associated with downstaging. Five-year overall survival rates for patients with clinical stages 0, I, II, III, and IV were 67.2%, 62.9%, 50.4%, 36.9%, and 27.2%, respectively, whereas those for the same pathologic stages were 70.8%, 75.8%, 63.7%, 41.5%, and 24.7%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, upstaging was associated with increased 5-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.80, P<.001), but downstaging was not associated with survival (HR 0.88, P=.160). In contrast, more extensive lymphadenectomy was associated with decreased 5-year mortality (HR 0.76 for ≥10 lymph nodes examined, P<.001), as was treatment at an National Cancer Institute–designated cancer center (HR 0.90, P=.042).

Conclusions

Clinical–pathologic stage discrepancy in BC patients is remarkably common across the United States. These findings should be considered when selecting patients for preoperative or nonoperative management strategies and when comparing the outcomes of bladder sparing approaches to RC.

Introduction

Cancer of the urinary bladder is a common cancer, with 72,570 new cases estimated in the United States in 2013 (1). Although most cases of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer are managed effectively with transurethral resection and intravesical therapy, up to 40% of patients develop treatment-refractory disease (2). For these patients and all patients with muscle invasion at diagnosis, radiation therapy (RC) is the most common treatment received (3). Despite this, nonoperative strategies, especially chemoradiation therapy , are widely practiced, with long-term outcomes comparable to those with cystectomy in many series 4, 5, 6.

Accurate clinical staging is vital for preoperative risk stratification and proper selection for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Accurate clinical stage is even more vital to appropriately select patients for nonoperative management strategies such as chemoradiation therapy. By definition, such therapies do not have the benefit of determining final pathologic stage. As such, the success of such therapies and the design of clinical trials to test novel nonoperative treatments are wholly dependent on the accuracy of the assigned clinical stage. Several previous reports have suggested high rates of clinical–pathologic stage discrepancy in bladder cancer patients 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14. These series, however, typically contain limited numbers of patients treated at a single large academic center where therapy and outcomes can vary significantly compared with nationwide practices 3, 15, 16. Additionally, most prospective cystectomy series fail to report survival by initial clinical stage. We sought to investigate the accuracy of clinical staging and its effect on outcome in bladder cancer patients treated with RC using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB).

Section snippets

Data source

The NCDB, jointly sponsored by the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society, is a hospital-based registry that serves as a comprehensive clinical surveillance resource that derives its data from the 1500 Commission on Cancer–accredited programs in the United States and Puerto Rico. As such, the NCDB captures approximately 70% of incident cancers in the United States each year, making it one of the most powerful and generalizable cancer databases in the world. Ongoing

Patient characteristics

Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Median patient age was 67 years. The majority (74.3%) of patients received RC alone. Postoperative chemotherapy was used in 21.9% of patients, whereas 3.8% received preoperative chemotherapy.

Staging and stage discrepancy

Discrepancies in overall AJCC stage were common (Fig. 1A, B; tabulated data available in Table e1, available online). Stage discrepancy was found in 47.8% of patients: 41.9% upstaging and 5.9% downstaging. Upstaging rates for clinical stage 0, I, II, and III

Discussion

Using contemporary data from the NCDB, including data from academic and community centers, we present here the largest study to date describing clinical staging in bladder cancer. We identify that nearly half of bladder cancer patients undergoing RC have a pathologic stage discordant with their clinical stage. This high level of discrepancy has important implications for prognostication, therapy selection, and risk stratification in the design of clinical trials investigating novel nonoperative

Conclusions

Accurate clinical staging is a matter of concern in all cancers for which limited pathologic information may be available (eg, biopsy sampling for prostate cancer, sentinel LN biopsy in breast cancer, nodal staging in lung cancer) and/or where preoperative therapy has become commonplace (eg, rectal adenocarcinoma, locally advanced breast cancer, tumors of the head and neck). Our study provides strong evidence confirming that current clinical staging in bladder cancer is inadequate, resulting in

References (34)

  • H.W. Herr et al.

    Impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer

    J Urol

    (2002)
  • R. Siegel et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2013

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2013)
  • H.W. Herr et al.

    Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy prevents tumor progression and death from superficial bladder cancer: Ten-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial

    J Clin Oncol

    (1995)
  • N.D. James et al.

    Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2012)
  • C. Rodel et al.

    Combined-modality treatment and selective organ preservation in invasive bladder cancer: Long-term results

    J Clin Oncol

    (2002)
  • R.S. Svatek et al.

    Discrepancy between clinical and pathological stage: External validation of the impact on prognosis in an international radical cystectomy cohort

    BJU Int

    (2011)
  • D. Canter et al.

    Clinicopathological outcomes after radical cystectomy for clinical T2 urothelial carcinoma: Further evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy

    BJU Int

    (2011)
  • Cited by (72)

    • Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Noninvasive Assessment of Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Preliminary Findings from the PURE-01 Study

      2020, European Urology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Radical cystectomy (RC), possibly preceded by neoadjuvant chemotherapy, represents the standard of care for treating nonmetastatic, muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) [1,2]. The radiological assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapies in MIBC has historically experienced major limitations [3–7]. These limitations are mainly related to the profound changes in bladder wall anatomy caused by the transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT), which generates a surgical defect with inflammatory reaction that usually precedes radiological imaging assessments.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflicts of interest: A.M.K. serves as a consultant for Sanofi.

    View full text